When an instruction's operand list does not have a sufficient number of
operands to match with all of the variables that contribute to its
encoding, instead of asserting inside a call to getSubOperandNumber, produce an
informative error.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204542
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
while (NumberedOp < NumberOps &&
(CGI.Operands.isFlatOperandNotEmitted(NumberedOp) ||
(NamedOpIndices.size() && NamedOpIndices.count(
- CGI.Operands.getSubOperandNumber(NumberedOp).first))))
+ CGI.Operands.getSubOperandNumber(NumberedOp).first)))) {
++NumberedOp;
+ if (NumberedOp >= CGI.Operands.back().MIOperandNo +
+ CGI.Operands.back().MINumOperands) {
+ errs() << "Too few operands in record " << R->getName() <<
+ " (no match for variable " << VarName << "):\n";
+ errs() << *R;
+ errs() << '\n';
+
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
OpIdx = NumberedOp++;
}