splitBasicBlock "does the right thing" now, no reason to reposition it.
authorChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 20:49:07 +0000 (20:49 +0000)
committerChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 20:49:07 +0000 (20:49 +0000)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11199 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/Transforms/IPO/LowerSetJmp.cpp

index 79f1c3e3e0e195a66da00c1d2a233acc058f501c..a2146f47de7e77e6328d9d902df66f1ae45ec92f 100644 (file)
@@ -455,10 +455,7 @@ void LowerSetJmp::visitCallInst(CallInst& CI)
   assert(NewBB && "Couldn't split BB of \"call\" instruction!!");
   NewBB->setName("Call2Invoke");
 
-  // Reposition the split BB in the BB list to make things tidier.
   Function* Func = OldBB->getParent();
-  Func->getBasicBlockList().remove(NewBB);
-  Func->getBasicBlockList().insert(++Function::iterator(OldBB), NewBB);
 
   // Construct the new "invoke" instruction.
   TerminatorInst* Term = OldBB->getTerminator();