BasicBlock::Create(F.getContext(), "eh.sjlj.setjmp.catch", &F);
// Insert a load of the callsite in the dispatch block, and a switch on its
- // value. By default, we go to a block that just does an unwind (which is the
- // correct action for a standard call).
- BasicBlock *UnwindBlock =
- BasicBlock::Create(F.getContext(), "unwindbb", &F);
- Unwinds.push_back(new UnwindInst(F.getContext(), UnwindBlock));
+ // value. By default, we issue a trap statement.
+ BasicBlock *TrapBlock =
+ BasicBlock::Create(F.getContext(), "trapbb", &F);
+ CallInst::Create(Intrinsic::getDeclaration(F.getParent(), Intrinsic::trap),
+ "", TrapBlock);
+ new UnreachableInst(F.getContext(), TrapBlock);
Value *DispatchLoad = new LoadInst(CallSite, "invoke.num", true,
DispatchBlock);
SwitchInst *DispatchSwitch =
- SwitchInst::Create(DispatchLoad, UnwindBlock, Invokes.size(),
+ SwitchInst::Create(DispatchLoad, TrapBlock, Invokes.size(),
DispatchBlock);
// Split the entry block to insert the conditional branch for the setjmp.
BasicBlock *ContBlock = EntryBB->splitBasicBlock(EntryBB->getTerminator(),
// Replace all unwinds with a branch to the unwind handler.
// ??? Should this ever happen with sjlj exceptions?
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Unwinds.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- BranchInst::Create(UnwindBlock, Unwinds[i]);
+ BranchInst::Create(TrapBlock, Unwinds[i]);
Unwinds[i]->eraseFromParent();
}