[InstCombine] Fix visitSwitchInst to use right operand types for sub cstexpr

The visitSwitchInst generates SUB constant expressions to recompute the
switch condition. When truncating the condition to a smaller type, SUB
expressions should use the previous type (before trunc) for both
operands. This fixes an assertion crash.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6644

rdar://problem/19191835

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
index 5eee15f648906cc4997e03a8aaf7ea002cf50063..fc965b879dfdc844f8eed12f02d9b8ab1ab35085 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
@@ -2115,8 +2115,10 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSwitchInst(SwitchInst &SI) {
         for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI.case_begin(), e = SI.case_end();
              i != e; ++i) {
           ConstantInt* CaseVal = i.getCaseValue();
-          Constant* NewCaseVal = ConstantExpr::getSub(cast<Constant>(CaseVal),
-                                                      AddRHS);
+          Constant *LHS = LeadingKnownZeros
+                              ? ConstantExpr::getZExt(CaseVal, Cond->getType())
+                              : ConstantExpr::getSExt(CaseVal, Cond->getType());
+          Constant* NewCaseVal = ConstantExpr::getSub(LHS, AddRHS);
           assert(isa<ConstantInt>(NewCaseVal) &&
                  "Result of expression should be constant");
           i.setValue(cast<ConstantInt>(NewCaseVal));

diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/narrow-switch.ll b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/narrow-switch.ll
index 7646189b8540f93102c48e57457857ed359f757c..f3f19bae03dda75e7118b5bc3e88628fde68f939 100644 (file)
--- a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/narrow-switch.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/narrow-switch.ll
@@ -91,3 +91,33 @@ return:
   %retval.0 = phi i32 [ 24, %sw.default ], [ 123, %sw.bb2 ], [ 213, %sw.bb1 ], [ 231, %entry ]
   ret i32 %retval.0
 }
+
+; Make sure to avoid assertion crashes and use the type before
+; truncation to generate the sub constant expressions that leads
+; to the recomputed condition.
+;
+; CHECK-LABEL: @trunc64to59
+; CHECK: switch i59
+; CHECK: i59 0, label
+; CHECK: i59 18717182647723699, label
+
+define void @trunc64to59(i64 %a) {
+entry:
+  %tmp0 = and i64 %a, 15
+  %tmp1 = mul i64 %tmp0, -6425668444178048401
+  %tmp2 = add i64 %tmp1, 5170979678563097242
+  %tmp3 = mul i64 %tmp2, 1627972535142754813
+  switch i64 %tmp3, label %sw.default [
+    i64 847514119312061490, label %sw.bb1
+    i64 866231301959785189, label %sw.bb2
+  ]
+
+sw.bb1:
+  br label %sw.default
+
+sw.bb2:
+  br label %sw.default
+
+sw.default:
+  ret void
+}