This patch reapplies r193676 with an additional fix for the Hexagon backend. The
SystemZ backend has already been fixed by r194148.
The Type Legalizer recognizes that VSELECT needs to be split, because the type
is to wide for the given target. The same does not always apply to SETCC,
because less space is required to encode the result of a comparison. As a result
VSELECT is split and SETCC is unrolled into scalar comparisons.
This commit fixes the issue by checking for VSELECT-SETCC patterns in the DAG
Combiner. If a matching pattern is found, then the result mask of SETCC is
promoted to the expected vector mask type for the given target. Now the type
legalizer will split both VSELECT and SETCC.
This allows the following X86 DAG Combine code to sucessfully detect the MIN/MAX
pattern. This fixes PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/
14594431>.
Reviewed by Nadav
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194542
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
}
}
+ // Treat SETCC as a vector mask and promote the result type based on the
+ // targets expected SETCC result type. This will ensure that SETCC and VSELECT
+ // are both split by the type legalizer. This is done to prevent the type
+ // legalizer from unrolling SETCC into scalar comparions.
+ EVT SelectVT = N->getValueType(0);
+ EVT MaskVT = getSetCCResultType(SelectVT);
+ assert(MaskVT.isVector() && "Expected a vector type.");
+ if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC && N0.getValueType() != MaskVT) {
+ SDLoc MaskDL(N0);
+
+ // Extend the mask to the desired value type.
+ ISD::NodeType ExtendCode =
+ TargetLowering::getExtendForContent(TLI.getBooleanContents(true));
+ SDValue Mask = DAG.getNode(ExtendCode, MaskDL, MaskVT, N0);
+
+ AddToWorkList(Mask.getNode());
+
+ SDValue LHS = N->getOperand(1);
+ SDValue RHS = N->getOperand(2);
+
+ return DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, SelectVT, Mask, LHS, RHS);
+ }
+
return SDValue();
}
SDValue Cond = N->getOperand(0);
CL = CH = Cond;
if (Cond.getValueType().isVector()) {
- assert(Cond.getValueType().getVectorElementType() == MVT::i1 &&
- "Condition legalized before result?");
- unsigned NumElements = Cond.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
- EVT VCondTy = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), MVT::i1, NumElements / 2);
- CL = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
- DAG.getConstant(0, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
- CH = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
- DAG.getConstant(NumElements / 2, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
+ if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
+ assert(Cond.getValueType() == getSetCCResultType(N->getValueType(0)) &&
+ "Condition has not been prepared for split!");
+ GetSplitVector(Cond, CL, CH);
+ } else {
+ EVT ETy = Cond.getValueType().getVectorElementType();
+ unsigned NumElements = Cond.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
+ EVT VCondTy = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), ETy, NumElements / 2);
+ CL = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
+ DAG.getConstant(0, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
+ CH = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, dl, VCondTy, Cond,
+ DAG.getConstant(NumElements / 2, TLI.getVectorIdxTy()));
+ }
}
Lo = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), dl, LL.getValueType(), CL, LL, RL);
SDValue LowerVASTART(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue LowerConstantPool(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
- virtual EVT getSetCCResultType(LLVMContext &, EVT) const {
- return MVT::i1;
+ virtual EVT getSetCCResultType(LLVMContext &C, EVT VT) const {
+ if (!VT.isVector())
+ return MVT::i1;
+ else
+ return EVT::getVectorVT(C, MVT::i1, VT.getVectorNumElements());
}
virtual bool getPostIndexedAddressParts(SDNode *N, SDNode *Op,
}
EVT X86TargetLowering::getSetCCResultType(LLVMContext &, EVT VT) const {
- if (!VT.isVector()) return MVT::i8;
+ if (!VT.isVector())
+ return MVT::i8;
+
+ const TargetMachine &TM = getTargetMachine();
+ if (!TM.Options.UseSoftFloat && Subtarget->hasAVX512())
+ switch(VT.getVectorNumElements()) {
+ case 8: return MVT::v8i1;
+ case 16: return MVT::v16i1;
+ }
+
return VT.changeVectorElementTypeToInteger();
}
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 -mcpu=corei7 < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=SSE4
+; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 -mcpu=corei7-avx < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=AVX1
+; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 -mcpu=core-avx2 < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=AVX2
+
+define <16 x i16> @split16(<16 x i16> %a, <16 x i16> %b, <16 x i8> %__mask) {
+; SSE4-LABEL: split16:
+; SSE4: pminuw
+; SSE4: pminuw
+; SSE4: ret
+; AVX1-LABEL: split16:
+; AVX1: vpminuw
+; AVX1: vpminuw
+; AVX1: ret
+; AVX2-LABEL: split16:
+; AVX2: vpminuw
+; AVX2: ret
+ %1 = icmp ult <16 x i16> %a, %b
+ %2 = select <16 x i1> %1, <16 x i16> %a, <16 x i16> %b
+ ret <16 x i16> %2
+}
+
+define <32 x i16> @split32(<32 x i16> %a, <32 x i16> %b, <32 x i8> %__mask) {
+; SSE4-LABEL: split32:
+; SSE4: pminuw
+; SSE4: pminuw
+; SSE4: pminuw
+; SSE4: pminuw
+; SSE4: ret
+; AVX1-LABEL: split32:
+; AVX1: vpminuw
+; AVX1: vpminuw
+; AVX1: vpminuw
+; AVX1: vpminuw
+; AVX1: ret
+; AVX2-LABEL: split32:
+; AVX2: vpminuw
+; AVX2: vpminuw
+; AVX2: ret
+ %1 = icmp ult <32 x i16> %a, %b
+ %2 = select <32 x i1> %1, <32 x i16> %a, <32 x i16> %b
+ ret <32 x i16> %2
+}