[X86] Use a better sentinel offset for the FrameAddr index

Other pieces of CodeGen want to negate frame object offsets to account
for architectures where the stack grows down.  Our object is a pseudo
object so it's offset doesn't matter.  However, we shouldn't choose an
offset which results in undefined behavior if you negate it.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237474 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 2b5c60019e346ad24c40befbe0cadaa07a46c438..5ec719bbd8c8250840c5d20c404202b1e503863a 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -15637,7 +15637,7 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerFRAMEADDR(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
       // Set up a frame object for the return address.
       unsigned SlotSize = RegInfo->getSlotSize();
       FrameAddrIndex = MF.getFrameInfo()->CreateFixedObject(
-          SlotSize, /*Offset=*/INT64_MIN, /*IsImmutable=*/false);
+          SlotSize, /*Offset=*/0, /*IsImmutable=*/false);
       FuncInfo->setFAIndex(FrameAddrIndex);
     }
     return DAG.getFrameIndex(FrameAddrIndex, VT);