if (!ExtForOpnd) {
// If yes, create a new one.
DEBUG(dbgs() << "More operands to ext\n");
- ExtForOpnd =
- cast<Instruction>(IsSExt ? TPT.createSExt(Ext, Opnd, Ext->getType())
- : TPT.createZExt(Ext, Opnd, Ext->getType()));
+ Value *ValForExtOpnd = IsSExt ? TPT.createSExt(Ext, Opnd, Ext->getType())
+ : TPT.createZExt(Ext, Opnd, Ext->getType());
+ if (!isa<Instruction>(ValForExtOpnd)) {
+ TPT.setOperand(ExtOpnd, OpIdx, ValForExtOpnd);
+ continue;
+ }
+ ExtForOpnd = cast<Instruction>(ValForExtOpnd);
++CreatedInsts;
}
if (Exts)
%b = zext <2 x i32> %a to <2 x i64>
ret void
}
+
+@a = common global i32 0, align 4
+@c = common global [2 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 4
+
+; PR21978.
+; Make sure we support promotion of operands that produces a Value as opposed
+; to an instruction.
+; This used to cause a crash.
+; OPTALL-LABEL: @promotionOfArgEndsUpInValue
+; OPTALL: [[LD:%[a-zA-Z_0-9-]+]] = load i16* %addr
+
+; OPT-NEXT: [[SEXT:%[a-zA-Z_0-9-]+]] = sext i16 [[LD]] to i32
+; OPT-NEXT: [[RES:%[a-zA-Z_0-9-]+]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[SEXT]], zext (i1 icmp ne (i32* getelementptr inbounds ([2 x i32]* @c, i64 0, i64 1), i32* @a) to i32)
+;
+; DISABLE-NEXT: [[ADD:%[a-zA-Z_0-9-]+]] = add nuw nsw i16 [[LD]], zext (i1 icmp ne (i32* getelementptr inbounds ([2 x i32]* @c, i64 0, i64 1), i32* @a) to i16)
+; DISABLE-NEXT: [[RES:%[a-zA-Z_0-9-]+]] = sext i16 [[ADD]] to i32
+;
+; OPTALL-NEXT: ret i32 [[RES]]
+define i32 @promotionOfArgEndsUpInValue(i16* %addr) {
+entry:
+ %val = load i16* %addr
+ %add = add nuw nsw i16 %val, zext (i1 icmp ne (i32* getelementptr inbounds ([2 x i32]* @c, i64 0, i64 1), i32* @a) to i16)
+ %conv3 = sext i16 %add to i32
+ ret i32 %conv3
+}