Corruptly merge constants with explicit and implicit alignments.

Constant merge can merge a constant with implicit alignment with one that has
explicit alignment. Before this change it was assuming that the explicit
alignment was higher than the implicit one, causing the result to be under
aligned in some cases.

Fixes pr17815.

Patch by Chris Smowton!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194506 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/IPO/ConstantMerge.cpp b/lib/Transforms/IPO/ConstantMerge.cpp
index a7bf18896b52709acaab35c53a1fa80280e52483..d94c0f4532372a96665d92037e0065df2cb89507 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Transforms/IPO/ConstantMerge.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/IPO/ConstantMerge.cpp
@@ -93,9 +93,12 @@ bool ConstantMerge::hasKnownAlignment(GlobalVariable *GV) const {
 }
 
 unsigned ConstantMerge::getAlignment(GlobalVariable *GV) const {
+  unsigned Align = GV->getAlignment();
+  if (Align)
+    return Align;
   if (TD)
     return TD->getPreferredAlignment(GV);
-  return GV->getAlignment();
+  return 0;
 }
 
 bool ConstantMerge::runOnModule(Module &M) {
@@ -210,9 +213,9 @@ bool ConstantMerge::runOnModule(Module &M) {
       // Bump the alignment if necessary.
       if (Replacements[i].first->getAlignment() ||
           Replacements[i].second->getAlignment()) {
-        Replacements[i].second->setAlignment(std::max(
-            Replacements[i].first->getAlignment(),
-            Replacements[i].second->getAlignment()));
+        Replacements[i].second->setAlignment(
+            std::max(getAlignment(Replacements[i].first),
+                     getAlignment(Replacements[i].second)));
       }
 
       // Eliminate any uses of the dead global.

diff --git a/test/Transforms/ConstantMerge/align.ll b/test/Transforms/ConstantMerge/align.ll
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c1cbcb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Transforms/ConstantMerge/align.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+; RUN: opt -constmerge -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+
+
+; Test that with a TD we do merge and mark the alignment as 4
+@T1A = internal unnamed_addr constant i32 1
+@T1B = internal unnamed_addr constant i32 1, align 2
+; CHECK: @T1B = internal unnamed_addr constant i32 1, align 4
+
+define void @test1(i32** %P1, i32** %P2) {
+  store i32* @T1A, i32** %P1
+  store i32* @T1B, i32** %P2
+  ret void
+}
+
+
+; Test that even with a TD we set the alignment to the maximum if both constants
+; have explicit alignments.
+@T2A = internal unnamed_addr constant i32 2, align 1
+@T2B = internal unnamed_addr constant i32 2, align 2
+; CHECK: @T2B = internal unnamed_addr constant i32 2, align 2
+
+define void @test2(i32** %P1, i32** %P2) {
+  store i32* @T2A, i32** %P1
+  store i32* @T2B, i32** %P2
+  ret void
+}