Fix the position of MemOperands in nodes that use variadic_ops

in DAGISelEmitter output. This bug was recently uncovered by the
addition of patterns for CALL32m and CALL64m, which are nodes
that now have both MemOperands and variadic_ops.

This bug was especially visible with PIC in various configurations,
because the new patterns are matching the indirect call code used
in many PIC configurations.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51877 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/variadic-node-pic.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/variadic-node-pic.ll
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4d76445
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/variadic-node-pic.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -relocation-model=pic -code-model=large
+
+target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128"
+target triple = "x86_64-apple-darwin8"
+
+declare void @xscanf(i64) nounwind 
+
+define void @foo() nounwind  {
+       call void (i64)* @xscanf( i64 0 ) nounwind
+       unreachable
+}

diff --git a/utils/TableGen/DAGISelEmitter.cpp b/utils/TableGen/DAGISelEmitter.cpp
index 29fec09515f5b98889495375e71b61f4db4fbef7..a4d08c6d0bd092ded6f52fe7e390dd9cda2aaf63 100644 (file)
--- a/utils/TableGen/DAGISelEmitter.cpp
+++ b/utils/TableGen/DAGISelEmitter.cpp
@@ -992,18 +992,6 @@ public:
         }
       }
 
-      // Generate MemOperandSDNodes nodes for each memory accesses covered by 
-      // this pattern.
-      if (II.isSimpleLoad | II.mayLoad | II.mayStore) {
-        std::vector<std::string>::const_iterator mi, mie;
-        for (mi = LSI.begin(), mie = LSI.end(); mi != mie; ++mi) {
-          emitCode("SDOperand LSI_" + *mi + " = "
-                   "CurDAG->getMemOperand(cast<LSBaseSDNode>(" +
-                   *mi + ")->getMemOperand());");
-          AllOps.push_back("LSI_" + *mi);
-        }
-      }
-
       // Emit all the chain and CopyToReg stuff.
       bool ChainEmitted = NodeHasChain;
       if (NodeHasChain)
@@ -1088,6 +1076,21 @@ public:
           emitCode("}");
         }
 
+        // Generate MemOperandSDNodes nodes for each memory accesses covered by 
+        // this pattern.
+        if (II.isSimpleLoad | II.mayLoad | II.mayStore) {
+          std::vector<std::string>::const_iterator mi, mie;
+          for (mi = LSI.begin(), mie = LSI.end(); mi != mie; ++mi) {
+            emitCode("SDOperand LSI_" + *mi + " = "
+                     "CurDAG->getMemOperand(cast<LSBaseSDNode>(" +
+                     *mi + ")->getMemOperand());");
+            if (IsVariadic)
+              emitCode("Ops" + utostr(OpsNo) + ".push_back(LSI_" + *mi + ");");
+            else
+              AllOps.push_back("LSI_" + *mi);
+          }
+        }
+
         if (NodeHasChain) {
           if (IsVariadic)
             emitCode("Ops" + utostr(OpsNo) + ".push_back(" + ChainName + ");");