Introduce a bit of a hack.

Splitting a landing pad takes considerable care because of PHIs and other
nasties. The problem is that the jump table needs to jump to the landing pad
block. However, the landing pad block can be jumped to only by an invoke
instruction. So we clone the landingpad instruction into its own basic block,
have the invoke jump to there. The landingpad instruction's basic block's
successor is now the target for the jump table.

But because of PHI nodes, we need to create another basic block for the jump
table to jump to. This is definitely a hack, because the values for the PHI
nodes may not be defined on the edge from the jump table. But that's okay,
because the jump table is simply a construct to mimic what is happening in the
CFG. So the values are mysteriously there, even though there is no value for the
PHI from the jump table's edge (hence calling this a hack).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SjLjEHPrepare.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SjLjEHPrepare.cpp
index ed0202551274d5dad7a35deb9f5ada4ce6332142..2a7a7cdc3c996613563858fe00f932e138d811f1 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SjLjEHPrepare.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SjLjEHPrepare.cpp
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ namespace {
     void markInvokeCallSite(InvokeInst *II, int InvokeNo, Value *CallSite,
                             SwitchInst *CatchSwitch);
     void splitLiveRangesAcrossInvokes(SmallVector<InvokeInst*,16> &Invokes);
+    void splitLandingPad(InvokeInst *II);
     bool insertSjLjEHSupport(Function &F);
   };
 } // end anonymous namespace
@@ -130,6 +131,42 @@ void SjLjEHPass::insertCallSiteStore(Instruction *I, int Number,
   new StoreInst(CallSiteNoC, CallSite, true, I);  // volatile
 }
 
+/// splitLandingPad - Split a landing pad. This takes considerable care because
+/// of PHIs and other nasties. The problem is that the jump table needs to jump
+/// to the landing pad block. However, the landing pad block can be jumped to
+/// only by an invoke instruction. So we clone the landingpad instruction into
+/// its own basic block, have the invoke jump to there. The landingpad
+/// instruction's basic block's successor is now the target for the jump table.
+///
+/// But because of PHI nodes, we need to create another basic block for the jump
+/// table to jump to. This is definitely a hack, because the values for the PHI
+/// nodes may not be defined on the edge from the jump table. But that's okay,
+/// because the jump table is simply a construct to mimic what is happening in
+/// the CFG. So the values are mysteriously there, even though there is no value
+/// for the PHI from the jump table's edge (hence calling this a hack).
+void SjLjEHPass::splitLandingPad(InvokeInst *II) {
+  SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 2> NewBBs;
+  SplitLandingPadPredecessors(II->getUnwindDest(), II->getParent(),
+                              ".1", ".2", this, NewBBs);
+
+  // Create an empty block so that the jump table has something to jump to
+  // which doesn't have any PHI nodes.
+  BasicBlock *LPad = NewBBs[0];
+  BasicBlock *Succ = *succ_begin(LPad);
+  BasicBlock *JumpTo = BasicBlock::Create(II->getContext(), "jt.land",
+                                          LPad->getParent(), Succ);
+  LPad->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
+  BranchInst::Create(JumpTo, LPad);
+  BranchInst::Create(Succ, JumpTo);
+  LPadSuccMap[II] = JumpTo;
+
+  for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Succ->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
+    PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(I);
+    Value *Val = PN->removeIncomingValue(LPad, false);
+    PN->addIncoming(Val, JumpTo);
+  }
+}
+
 /// markInvokeCallSite - Insert code to mark the call_site for this invoke
 void SjLjEHPass::markInvokeCallSite(InvokeInst *II, int InvokeNo,
                                     Value *CallSite,
@@ -139,19 +176,15 @@ void SjLjEHPass::markInvokeCallSite(InvokeInst *II, int InvokeNo,
   // The runtime comes back to the dispatcher with the call_site - 1 in
   // the context. Odd, but there it is.
   ConstantInt *SwitchValC = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(II->getContext()),
-                                            InvokeNo - 1);
+                                             InvokeNo - 1);
 
   // If the unwind edge has phi nodes, split the edge.
   if (isa<PHINode>(II->getUnwindDest()->begin())) {
     // FIXME: New EH - This if-condition will be always true in the new scheme.
-    if (II->getUnwindDest()->isLandingPad()) {
-      SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 2> NewBBs;
-      SplitLandingPadPredecessors(II->getUnwindDest(), II->getParent(),
-                                  ".1", ".2", this, NewBBs);
-      LPadSuccMap[II] = *succ_begin(NewBBs[0]);
-    } else {
+    if (II->getUnwindDest()->isLandingPad())
+      splitLandingPad(II);
+    else
       SplitCriticalEdge(II, 1, this);
-    }
 
     // If there are any phi nodes left, they must have a single predecessor.
     while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(II->getUnwindDest()->begin())) {
@@ -201,14 +234,10 @@ splitLiveRangesAcrossInvokes(SmallVector<InvokeInst*,16> &Invokes) {
     SplitCriticalEdge(II, 0, this);
 
     // FIXME: New EH - This if-condition will be always true in the new scheme.
-    if (II->getUnwindDest()->isLandingPad()) {
-      SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 2> NewBBs;
-      SplitLandingPadPredecessors(II->getUnwindDest(), II->getParent(),
-                                  ".1", ".2", this, NewBBs);
-      LPadSuccMap[II] = *succ_begin(NewBBs[0]);
-    } else {
+    if (II->getUnwindDest()->isLandingPad())
+      splitLandingPad(II);
+    else
       SplitCriticalEdge(II, 1, this);
-    }
 
     assert(!isa<PHINode>(II->getNormalDest()) &&
            !isa<PHINode>(II->getUnwindDest()) &&