The rationale for this artificial dependency seems to have been lost to the
ravages of time, it is covered by no regression tests, and has no impact on
test-suite performance numbers on either x86 or PPC.
For the test suite, on both x86 and PPC, I ran the test suite 10 times (both as
a baseline and with this change), and found no statistically-significant
changes. For PPC, I used a P7 box. For x86, I used an Intel Xeon E5430. Both
with -O3 -mcpu=native.
This was discussed on-list back in January, but I've not had a chance to run
the performance tests until today.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206795
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
// we have lost all RejectMemNodes below barrier.
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Barrier));
-
- if (!ExitSU.isPred(SU))
- // Push store's up a bit to avoid them getting in between cmp
- // and branches.
- ExitSU.addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Artificial));
} else if (MI->mayLoad()) {
bool MayAlias = true;
if (MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)) {