--- /dev/null
+; THis testcase caused an assertion failure because a PHI node did not have
+; entries for it's postdominator. But I think this can only happen when the
+; PHI node is dead, so we just avoid patching up dead PHI nodes.
+
+; RUN: as < %s | opt -adce
+
+target endian = little
+target pointersize = 32
+
+implementation ; Functions:
+
+void %dead_test8() {
+entry: ; No predecessors!
+ br label %loopentry
+
+loopentry: ; preds = %entry, %endif
+ %k.1 = phi int [ %k.0, %endif ], [ 0, %entry ] ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ br bool false, label %no_exit, label %return
+
+no_exit: ; preds = %loopentry
+ br bool false, label %then, label %else
+
+then: ; preds = %no_exit
+ br label %endif
+
+else: ; preds = %no_exit
+ %dec = add int %k.1, -1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ br label %endif
+
+endif: ; preds = %else, %then
+ %k.0 = phi int [ %dec, %else ], [ 0, %then ] ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ store int 2, int* null
+ br label %loopentry
+
+return: ; preds = %loopentry
+ ret void
+}