Fix a few more grammatic errors in docs/TableGen/index.rst

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/docs/TableGen/index.rst b/docs/TableGen/index.rst
index d62dcb1c1a4084c46177daab8038c6cb6fe6afcf..511a97e251486b494ba3ebfcba92989ffcead9c4 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/TableGen/index.rst
+++ b/docs/TableGen/index.rst
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ which are considered 'records'.
 **TableGen records** have a unique name, a list of values, and a list of
 superclasses.  The list of values is the main data that TableGen builds for each
 record; it is this that holds the domain specific information for the
 **TableGen records** have a unique name, a list of values, and a list of
 superclasses.  The list of values is the main data that TableGen builds for each
 record; it is this that holds the domain specific information for the

-application.  The interpretation of this data is left to a specific `backends`_,
+application.  The interpretation of this data is left to a specific `backend`_,

 but the structure and format rules are taken care of and are fixed by
 TableGen.
 
 but the structure and format rules are taken care of and are fixed by
 TableGen.
 


@@ -295,11 +295,11 @@ the basic concepts via custom-made back-ends, which can pervert the original
 design and make it very hard for newcomers to understand the evil TableGen
 file.
 
 design and make it very hard for newcomers to understand the evil TableGen
 file.
 

-There are some in favour of extending the semantics even more, but makeing sure
-back-ends adhere to strict rules. Others suggesting we should move to less,
+There are some in favour of extending the semantics even more, but making sure
+back-ends adhere to strict rules. Others are suggesting we should move to less,

 more powerful DSLs designed with specific purposes, or even re-using existing
 DSLs.
 
 more powerful DSLs designed with specific purposes, or even re-using existing
 DSLs.
 

-Either way, this is a discussion that is likely spanning across several years,
+Either way, this is a discussion that will likely span across several years,

 if not decades. You can read more in the `TableGen Deficiencies <Deficiencies.html>`_
 document.
 if not decades. You can read more in the `TableGen Deficiencies <Deficiencies.html>`_
 document.