[asan] one more workaround for PR17409: don't do BB-level coverage instrumentation...

[oota-llvm.git] / test / Instrumentation / AddressSanitizer / coverage.ll

diff --git a/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/coverage.ll b/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/coverage.ll
index 06701325db825c468c081d0c3f1eda9ca138247a..7f397f453ff1b6e22200f4ab2a7807bb8763edf5 100644 (file)
--- a/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/coverage.ll
+++ b/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/coverage.ll
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 ; RUN: opt < %s -asan -asan-module -asan-coverage=1 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK1
 ; RUN: opt < %s -asan -asan-module -asan-coverage=2 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK2
+; RUN: opt < %s -asan -asan-module -asan-coverage=2 -asan-coverage-block-threshold=10 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK2
+; RUN: opt < %s -asan -asan-module -asan-coverage=2 -asan-coverage-block-threshold=1  -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK1
 target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64"
 target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
 define void @foo(i32* %a) sanitize_address {