#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
#include "llvm/Assembly/Writer.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/SSAUpdater.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/Hashing.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Allocator.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/IRBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/PatternMatch.h"
using namespace llvm;
+using namespace PatternMatch;
STATISTIC(NumGVNInstr, "Number of instructions deleted");
STATISTIC(NumGVNLoad, "Number of loads deleted");
STATISTIC(NumGVNPRE, "Number of instructions PRE'd");
STATISTIC(NumGVNBlocks, "Number of blocks merged");
+STATISTIC(NumGVNSimpl, "Number of instructions simplified");
+STATISTIC(NumGVNEqProp, "Number of equalities propagated");
STATISTIC(NumPRELoad, "Number of loads PRE'd");
static cl::opt<bool> EnablePRE("enable-pre",
return false;
return true;
}
+
+ friend hash_code hash_value(const Expression &Value) {
+ return hash_combine(Value.opcode, Value.type,
+ hash_combine_range(Value.varargs.begin(),
+ Value.varargs.end()));
+ }
};
class ValueTable {
uint32_t nextValueNumber;
Expression create_expression(Instruction* I);
+ Expression create_cmp_expression(unsigned Opcode,
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS);
Expression create_extractvalue_expression(ExtractValueInst* EI);
uint32_t lookup_or_add_call(CallInst* C);
public:
ValueTable() : nextValueNumber(1) { }
uint32_t lookup_or_add(Value *V);
uint32_t lookup(Value *V) const;
+ uint32_t lookup_or_add_cmp(unsigned Opcode, CmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS);
void add(Value *V, uint32_t num);
void clear();
void erase(Value *v);
}
static unsigned getHashValue(const Expression e) {
- unsigned hash = e.opcode;
-
- hash = ((unsigned)((uintptr_t)e.type >> 4) ^
- (unsigned)((uintptr_t)e.type >> 9));
-
- for (SmallVector<uint32_t, 4>::const_iterator I = e.varargs.begin(),
- E = e.varargs.end(); I != E; ++I)
- hash = *I + hash * 37;
-
- return hash;
+ using llvm::hash_value;
+ return static_cast<unsigned>(hash_value(e));
}
static bool isEqual(const Expression &LHS, const Expression &RHS) {
return LHS == RHS;
for (Instruction::op_iterator OI = I->op_begin(), OE = I->op_end();
OI != OE; ++OI)
e.varargs.push_back(lookup_or_add(*OI));
+ if (I->isCommutative()) {
+ // Ensure that commutative instructions that only differ by a permutation
+ // of their operands get the same value number by sorting the operand value
+ // numbers. Since all commutative instructions have two operands it is more
+ // efficient to sort by hand rather than using, say, std::sort.
+ assert(I->getNumOperands() == 2 && "Unsupported commutative instruction!");
+ if (e.varargs[0] > e.varargs[1])
+ std::swap(e.varargs[0], e.varargs[1]);
+ }
if (CmpInst *C = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(I)) {
- e.opcode = (C->getOpcode() << 8) | C->getPredicate();
+ // Sort the operand value numbers so x<y and y>x get the same value number.
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate = C->getPredicate();
+ if (e.varargs[0] > e.varargs[1]) {
+ std::swap(e.varargs[0], e.varargs[1]);
+ Predicate = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Predicate);
+ }
+ e.opcode = (C->getOpcode() << 8) | Predicate;
} else if (InsertValueInst *E = dyn_cast<InsertValueInst>(I)) {
for (InsertValueInst::idx_iterator II = E->idx_begin(), IE = E->idx_end();
II != IE; ++II)
return e;
}
+Expression ValueTable::create_cmp_expression(unsigned Opcode,
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS) {
+ assert((Opcode == Instruction::ICmp || Opcode == Instruction::FCmp) &&
+ "Not a comparison!");
+ Expression e;
+ e.type = CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(LHS->getType());
+ e.varargs.push_back(lookup_or_add(LHS));
+ e.varargs.push_back(lookup_or_add(RHS));
+
+ // Sort the operand value numbers so x<y and y>x get the same value number.
+ if (e.varargs[0] > e.varargs[1]) {
+ std::swap(e.varargs[0], e.varargs[1]);
+ Predicate = CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Predicate);
+ }
+ e.opcode = (Opcode << 8) | Predicate;
+ return e;
+}
+
Expression ValueTable::create_extractvalue_expression(ExtractValueInst *EI) {
assert(EI != 0 && "Not an ExtractValueInst?");
Expression e;
return VI->second;
}
+/// lookup_or_add_cmp - Returns the value number of the given comparison,
+/// assigning it a new number if it did not have one before. Useful when
+/// we deduced the result of a comparison, but don't immediately have an
+/// instruction realizing that comparison to hand.
+uint32_t ValueTable::lookup_or_add_cmp(unsigned Opcode,
+ CmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
+ Value *LHS, Value *RHS) {
+ Expression exp = create_cmp_expression(Opcode, Predicate, LHS, RHS);
+ uint32_t& e = expressionNumbering[exp];
+ if (!e) e = nextValueNumber++;
+ return e;
+}
+
/// clear - Remove all entries from the ValueTable.
void ValueTable::clear() {
valueNumbering.clear();
MemoryDependenceAnalysis *MD;
DominatorTree *DT;
const TargetData *TD;
-
+ const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI;
+
ValueTable VN;
/// LeaderTable - A mapping from value numbers to lists of Value*'s that
// This transformation requires dominator postdominator info
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
+ AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfo>();
if (!NoLoads)
AU.addRequired<MemoryDependenceAnalysis>();
AU.addRequired<AliasAnalysis>();
void cleanupGlobalSets();
void verifyRemoved(const Instruction *I) const;
bool splitCriticalEdges();
+ unsigned replaceAllDominatedUsesWith(Value *From, Value *To,
+ BasicBlock *Root);
+ bool propagateEquality(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, BasicBlock *Root);
};
char GVN::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(GVN, "gvn", "Global Value Numbering", false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MemoryDependenceAnalysis)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTree)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfo)
INITIALIZE_AG_DEPENDENCY(AliasAnalysis)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(GVN, "gvn", "Global Value Numbering", false, false)
// If this is already the right type, just return it.
Type *StoredValTy = StoredVal->getType();
- uint64_t StoreSize = TD.getTypeStoreSizeInBits(StoredValTy);
- uint64_t LoadSize = TD.getTypeStoreSizeInBits(LoadedTy);
+ uint64_t StoreSize = TD.getTypeSizeInBits(StoredValTy);
+ uint64_t LoadSize = TD.getTypeSizeInBits(LoadedTy);
// If the store and reload are the same size, we can always reuse it.
if (StoreSize == LoadSize) {
Value *WritePtr,
uint64_t WriteSizeInBits,
const TargetData &TD) {
- // If the loaded or stored value is an first class array or struct, don't try
+ // If the loaded or stored value is a first class array or struct, don't try
// to transform them. We need to be able to bitcast to integer.
if (LoadTy->isStructTy() || LoadTy->isArrayTy())
return -1;
// Compute which bits of the stored value are being used by the load. Convert
// to an integer type to start with.
if (SrcVal->getType()->isPointerTy())
- SrcVal = Builder.CreatePtrToInt(SrcVal, TD.getIntPtrType(Ctx), "tmp");
+ SrcVal = Builder.CreatePtrToInt(SrcVal, TD.getIntPtrType(Ctx));
if (!SrcVal->getType()->isIntegerTy())
- SrcVal = Builder.CreateBitCast(SrcVal, IntegerType::get(Ctx, StoreSize*8),
- "tmp");
+ SrcVal = Builder.CreateBitCast(SrcVal, IntegerType::get(Ctx, StoreSize*8));
// Shift the bits to the least significant depending on endianness.
unsigned ShiftAmt;
ShiftAmt = (StoreSize-LoadSize-Offset)*8;
if (ShiftAmt)
- SrcVal = Builder.CreateLShr(SrcVal, ShiftAmt, "tmp");
+ SrcVal = Builder.CreateLShr(SrcVal, ShiftAmt);
if (LoadSize != StoreSize)
- SrcVal = Builder.CreateTrunc(SrcVal, IntegerType::get(Ctx, LoadSize*8),
- "tmp");
+ SrcVal = Builder.CreateTrunc(SrcVal, IntegerType::get(Ctx, LoadSize*8));
return CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType(SrcVal, LoadTy, InsertPt, TD);
}
-/// GetStoreValueForLoad - This function is called when we have a
+/// GetLoadValueForLoad - This function is called when we have a
/// memdep query of a load that ends up being a clobbering load. This means
/// that the load *may* provide bits used by the load but we can't be sure
/// because the pointers don't mustalias. Check this case to see if there is
// If we had to process more than one hundred blocks to find the
// dependencies, this load isn't worth worrying about. Optimizing
// it will be too expensive.
- if (Deps.size() > 100)
+ unsigned NumDeps = Deps.size();
+ if (NumDeps > 100)
return false;
// If we had a phi translation failure, we'll have a single entry which is a
// clobber in the current block. Reject this early.
- if (Deps.size() == 1 && Deps[0].getResult().isUnknown()) {
+ if (NumDeps == 1 &&
+ !Deps[0].getResult().isDef() && !Deps[0].getResult().isClobber()) {
DEBUG(
dbgs() << "GVN: non-local load ";
WriteAsOperand(dbgs(), LI);
// where we have a value available in repl, also keep track of whether we see
// dependencies that produce an unknown value for the load (such as a call
// that could potentially clobber the load).
- SmallVector<AvailableValueInBlock, 16> ValuesPerBlock;
- SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 16> UnavailableBlocks;
+ SmallVector<AvailableValueInBlock, 64> ValuesPerBlock;
+ SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 64> UnavailableBlocks;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = Deps.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = NumDeps; i != e; ++i) {
BasicBlock *DepBB = Deps[i].getBB();
MemDepResult DepInfo = Deps[i].getResult();
- if (DepInfo.isUnknown()) {
+ if (!DepInfo.isDef() && !DepInfo.isClobber()) {
UnavailableBlocks.push_back(DepBB);
continue;
}
continue;
}
- assert(DepInfo.isDef() && "Expecting def here");
+ // DepInfo.isDef() here
Instruction *DepInst = DepInfo.getInst();
return false;
}
- if (Dep.isUnknown()) {
+ // If it is defined in another block, try harder.
+ if (Dep.isNonLocal())
+ return processNonLocalLoad(L);
+
+ if (!Dep.isDef()) {
DEBUG(
// fast print dep, using operator<< on instruction is too slow.
dbgs() << "GVN: load ";
return false;
}
- // If it is defined in another block, try harder.
- if (Dep.isNonLocal())
- return processNonLocalLoad(L);
-
- assert(Dep.isDef() && "Expecting def here");
-
Instruction *DepInst = Dep.getInst();
if (StoreInst *DepSI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(DepInst)) {
Value *StoredVal = DepSI->getValueOperand();
return Val;
}
+/// replaceAllDominatedUsesWith - Replace all uses of 'From' with 'To' if the
+/// use is dominated by the given basic block. Returns the number of uses that
+/// were replaced.
+unsigned GVN::replaceAllDominatedUsesWith(Value *From, Value *To,
+ BasicBlock *Root) {
+ unsigned Count = 0;
+ for (Value::use_iterator UI = From->use_begin(), UE = From->use_end();
+ UI != UE; ) {
+ Use &U = (UI++).getUse();
+
+ // If From occurs as a phi node operand then the use implicitly lives in the
+ // corresponding incoming block. Otherwise it is the block containing the
+ // user that must be dominated by Root.
+ BasicBlock *UsingBlock;
+ if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(U.getUser()))
+ UsingBlock = PN->getIncomingBlock(U);
+ else
+ UsingBlock = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser())->getParent();
+
+ if (DT->dominates(Root, UsingBlock)) {
+ U.set(To);
+ ++Count;
+ }
+ }
+ return Count;
+}
+
+/// propagateEquality - The given values are known to be equal in every block
+/// dominated by 'Root'. Exploit this, for example by replacing 'LHS' with
+/// 'RHS' everywhere in the scope. Returns whether a change was made.
+bool GVN::propagateEquality(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, BasicBlock *Root) {
+ if (LHS == RHS) return false;
+ assert(LHS->getType() == RHS->getType() && "Equal but types differ!");
+
+ // Don't try to propagate equalities between constants.
+ if (isa<Constant>(LHS) && isa<Constant>(RHS))
+ return false;
+
+ // Prefer a constant on the right-hand side, or an Argument if no constants.
+ if (isa<Constant>(LHS) || (isa<Argument>(LHS) && !isa<Constant>(RHS)))
+ std::swap(LHS, RHS);
+ assert((isa<Argument>(LHS) || isa<Instruction>(LHS)) && "Unexpected value!");
+
+ // If there is no obvious reason to prefer the left-hand side over the right-
+ // hand side, ensure the longest lived term is on the right-hand side, so the
+ // shortest lived term will be replaced by the longest lived. This tends to
+ // expose more simplifications.
+ uint32_t LVN = VN.lookup_or_add(LHS);
+ if ((isa<Argument>(LHS) && isa<Argument>(RHS)) ||
+ (isa<Instruction>(LHS) && isa<Instruction>(RHS))) {
+ // Move the 'oldest' value to the right-hand side, using the value number as
+ // a proxy for age.
+ uint32_t RVN = VN.lookup_or_add(RHS);
+ if (LVN < RVN) {
+ std::swap(LHS, RHS);
+ LVN = RVN;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // If value numbering later deduces that an instruction in the scope is equal
+ // to 'LHS' then ensure it will be turned into 'RHS'.
+ addToLeaderTable(LVN, RHS, Root);
+
+ // Replace all occurrences of 'LHS' with 'RHS' everywhere in the scope. As
+ // LHS always has at least one use that is not dominated by Root, this will
+ // never do anything if LHS has only one use.
+ bool Changed = false;
+ if (!LHS->hasOneUse()) {
+ unsigned NumReplacements = replaceAllDominatedUsesWith(LHS, RHS, Root);
+ Changed |= NumReplacements > 0;
+ NumGVNEqProp += NumReplacements;
+ }
+
+ // Now try to deduce additional equalities from this one. For example, if the
+ // known equality was "(A != B)" == "false" then it follows that A and B are
+ // equal in the scope. Only boolean equalities with an explicit true or false
+ // RHS are currently supported.
+ if (!RHS->getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
+ // Not a boolean equality - bail out.
+ return Changed;
+ ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RHS);
+ if (!CI)
+ // RHS neither 'true' nor 'false' - bail out.
+ return Changed;
+ // Whether RHS equals 'true'. Otherwise it equals 'false'.
+ bool isKnownTrue = CI->isAllOnesValue();
+ bool isKnownFalse = !isKnownTrue;
+
+ // If "A && B" is known true then both A and B are known true. If "A || B"
+ // is known false then both A and B are known false.
+ Value *A, *B;
+ if ((isKnownTrue && match(LHS, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) ||
+ (isKnownFalse && match(LHS, m_Or(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))))) {
+ Changed |= propagateEquality(A, RHS, Root);
+ Changed |= propagateEquality(B, RHS, Root);
+ return Changed;
+ }
+
+ // If we are propagating an equality like "(A == B)" == "true" then also
+ // propagate the equality A == B. When propagating a comparison such as
+ // "(A >= B)" == "true", replace all instances of "A < B" with "false".
+ if (ICmpInst *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(LHS)) {
+ Value *Op0 = Cmp->getOperand(0), *Op1 = Cmp->getOperand(1);
+
+ // If "A == B" is known true, or "A != B" is known false, then replace
+ // A with B everywhere in the scope.
+ if ((isKnownTrue && Cmp->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ) ||
+ (isKnownFalse && Cmp->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_NE))
+ Changed |= propagateEquality(Op0, Op1, Root);
+
+ // If "A >= B" is known true, replace "A < B" with false everywhere.
+ CmpInst::Predicate NotPred = Cmp->getInversePredicate();
+ Constant *NotVal = ConstantInt::get(Cmp->getType(), isKnownFalse);
+ // Since we don't have the instruction "A < B" immediately to hand, work out
+ // the value number that it would have and use that to find an appropriate
+ // instruction (if any).
+ uint32_t NextNum = VN.getNextUnusedValueNumber();
+ uint32_t Num = VN.lookup_or_add_cmp(Cmp->getOpcode(), NotPred, Op0, Op1);
+ // If the number we were assigned was brand new then there is no point in
+ // looking for an instruction realizing it: there cannot be one!
+ if (Num < NextNum) {
+ Value *NotCmp = findLeader(Root, Num);
+ if (NotCmp && isa<Instruction>(NotCmp)) {
+ unsigned NumReplacements =
+ replaceAllDominatedUsesWith(NotCmp, NotVal, Root);
+ Changed |= NumReplacements > 0;
+ NumGVNEqProp += NumReplacements;
+ }
+ }
+ // Ensure that any instruction in scope that gets the "A < B" value number
+ // is replaced with false.
+ addToLeaderTable(Num, NotVal, Root);
+
+ return Changed;
+ }
+
+ return Changed;
+}
+
+/// isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge - There is an edge from 'Src' to 'Dst'. Return
+/// true if every path from the entry block to 'Dst' passes via this edge. In
+/// particular 'Dst' must not be reachable via another edge from 'Src'.
+static bool isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(BasicBlock *Src, BasicBlock *Dst,
+ DominatorTree *DT) {
+ // While in theory it is interesting to consider the case in which Dst has
+ // more than one predecessor, because Dst might be part of a loop which is
+ // only reachable from Src, in practice it is pointless since at the time
+ // GVN runs all such loops have preheaders, which means that Dst will have
+ // been changed to have only one predecessor, namely Src.
+ BasicBlock *Pred = Dst->getSinglePredecessor();
+ assert((!Pred || Pred == Src) && "No edge between these basic blocks!");
+ (void)Src;
+ return Pred != 0;
+}
/// processInstruction - When calculating availability, handle an instruction
/// by inserting it into the appropriate sets
// to value numbering it. Value numbering often exposes redundancies, for
// example if it determines that %y is equal to %x then the instruction
// "%z = and i32 %x, %y" becomes "%z = and i32 %x, %x" which we now simplify.
- if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(I, TD, DT)) {
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(I, TD, TLI, DT)) {
I->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
if (MD && V->getType()->isPointerTy())
MD->invalidateCachedPointerInfo(V);
markInstructionForDeletion(I);
+ ++NumGVNSimpl;
return true;
}
return false;
}
- // For conditions branches, we can perform simple conditional propagation on
+ // For conditional branches, we can perform simple conditional propagation on
// the condition value itself.
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(I)) {
if (!BI->isConditional() || isa<Constant>(BI->getCondition()))
return false;
-
+
Value *BranchCond = BI->getCondition();
- uint32_t CondVN = VN.lookup_or_add(BranchCond);
-
+
BasicBlock *TrueSucc = BI->getSuccessor(0);
BasicBlock *FalseSucc = BI->getSuccessor(1);
-
- if (TrueSucc->getSinglePredecessor())
- addToLeaderTable(CondVN,
- ConstantInt::getTrue(TrueSucc->getContext()),
- TrueSucc);
- if (FalseSucc->getSinglePredecessor())
- addToLeaderTable(CondVN,
- ConstantInt::getFalse(TrueSucc->getContext()),
- FalseSucc);
-
- return false;
+ BasicBlock *Parent = BI->getParent();
+ bool Changed = false;
+
+ if (isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(Parent, TrueSucc, DT))
+ Changed |= propagateEquality(BranchCond,
+ ConstantInt::getTrue(TrueSucc->getContext()),
+ TrueSucc);
+
+ if (isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(Parent, FalseSucc, DT))
+ Changed |= propagateEquality(BranchCond,
+ ConstantInt::getFalse(FalseSucc->getContext()),
+ FalseSucc);
+
+ return Changed;
}
-
+
+ // For switches, propagate the case values into the case destinations.
+ if (SwitchInst *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(I)) {
+ Value *SwitchCond = SI->getCondition();
+ BasicBlock *Parent = SI->getParent();
+ bool Changed = false;
+ for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->case_begin(), e = SI->case_end();
+ i != e; ++i) {
+ BasicBlock *Dst = i.getCaseSuccessor();
+ if (isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(Parent, Dst, DT))
+ Changed |= propagateEquality(SwitchCond, i.getCaseValue(), Dst);
+ }
+ return Changed;
+ }
+
// Instructions with void type don't return a value, so there's
- // no point in trying to find redudancies in them.
+ // no point in trying to find redundancies in them.
if (I->getType()->isVoidTy()) return false;
uint32_t NextNum = VN.getNextUnusedValueNumber();
// If the number we were assigned was a brand new VN, then we don't
// need to do a lookup to see if the number already exists
// somewhere in the domtree: it can't!
- if (Num == NextNum) {
+ if (Num >= NextNum) {
addToLeaderTable(Num, I, I->getParent());
return false;
}
MD = &getAnalysis<MemoryDependenceAnalysis>();
DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
TD = getAnalysisIfAvailable<TargetData>();
+ TLI = &getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfo>();
VN.setAliasAnalysis(&getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>());
VN.setMemDep(MD);
VN.setDomTree(DT);
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff