setStackPointerRegisterToSaveRestore(RegInfo->getStackRegister());
// Bypass expensive divides on Atom when compiling with O2
- if (Subtarget->hasSlowDivide() && TM.getOptLevel() >= CodeGenOpt::Default) {
- addBypassSlowDiv(32, 8);
- if (Subtarget->is64Bit())
+ if (TM.getOptLevel() >= CodeGenOpt::Default) {
+ if (Subtarget->hasSlowDivide32())
+ addBypassSlowDiv(32, 8);
+ if (Subtarget->hasSlowDivide64() && Subtarget->is64Bit())
addBypassSlowDiv(64, 16);
}
// Extract subvector is special because the value type
// (result) is 128-bit but the source is 256-bit wide.
- if (VT.is128BitVector())
+ if (VT.is128BitVector()) {
+ if (VT.getScalarSizeInBits() >= 32) {
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MLOAD, VT, Custom);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MSTORE, VT, Custom);
+ }
setOperationAction(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, VT, Custom);
-
+ }
// Do not attempt to custom lower other non-256-bit vectors
if (!VT.is256BitVector())
continue;
+ if (VT.getScalarSizeInBits() >= 32) {
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MLOAD, VT, Legal);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MSTORE, VT, Legal);
+ }
setOperationAction(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, VT, Custom);
setOperationAction(ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE, VT, Custom);
setOperationAction(ISD::INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, VT, Custom);
unsigned EltSize = VT.getVectorElementType().getSizeInBits();
// Extract subvector is special because the value type
// (result) is 256/128-bit but the source is 512-bit wide.
- if (VT.is128BitVector() || VT.is256BitVector())
+ if (VT.is128BitVector() || VT.is256BitVector()) {
setOperationAction(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, VT, Custom);
-
+ if ( EltSize >= 32) {
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MLOAD, VT, Legal);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MSTORE, VT, Legal);
+ }
+ }
if (VT.getVectorElementType() == MVT::i1)
setOperationAction(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, VT, Legal);
setOperationAction(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, VT, Custom);
setOperationAction(ISD::SCALAR_TO_VECTOR, VT, Custom);
setOperationAction(ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, VT, Custom);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MLOAD, VT, Legal);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::MSTORE, VT, Legal);
}
}
for (int i = MVT::v32i8; i != MVT::v8i64; ++i) {
// We only know how to deal with build_vector nodes where elements are either
// zeroable or extract_vector_elt with constant index.
SDValue FirstNonZero;
- for (int i=0; i < 4; ++i) {
+ unsigned FirstNonZeroIdx;
+ for (unsigned i=0; i < 4; ++i) {
if (Zeroable[i])
continue;
SDValue Elt = Op->getOperand(i);
MVT VT = Elt.getOperand(0).getSimpleValueType();
if (!VT.is128BitVector())
return SDValue();
- if (!FirstNonZero.getNode())
+ if (!FirstNonZero.getNode()) {
FirstNonZero = Elt;
+ FirstNonZeroIdx = i;
+ }
}
assert(FirstNonZero.getNode() && "Unexpected build vector of all zeros!");
return SDValue();
SDValue V2 = Elt.getOperand(0);
- if (Elt == FirstNonZero)
+ if (Elt == FirstNonZero && EltIdx == FirstNonZeroIdx)
V1 = SDValue();
bool CanFold = true;
DAG.getConstant(PermMask, MVT::i8));
}
+/// \brief Lower a vector shuffle by first fixing the 128-bit lanes and then
+/// shuffling each lane.
+///
+/// This will only succeed when the result of fixing the 128-bit lanes results
+/// in a single-input non-lane-crossing shuffle with a repeating shuffle mask in
+/// each 128-bit lanes. This handles many cases where we can quickly blend away
+/// the lane crosses early and then use simpler shuffles within each lane.
+///
+/// FIXME: It might be worthwhile at some point to support this without
+/// requiring the 128-bit lane-relative shuffles to be repeating, but currently
+/// in x86 only floating point has interesting non-repeating shuffles, and even
+/// those are still *marginally* more expensive.
+static SDValue lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes(
+ SDLoc DL, MVT VT, SDValue V1, SDValue V2, ArrayRef<int> Mask,
+ const X86Subtarget *Subtarget, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
+ assert(!isSingleInputShuffleMask(Mask) &&
+ "This is only useful with multiple inputs.");
+
+ int Size = Mask.size();
+ int LaneSize = 128 / VT.getScalarSizeInBits();
+ int NumLanes = Size / LaneSize;
+ assert(NumLanes > 1 && "Only handles 256-bit and wider shuffles.");
+
+ // See if we can build a hypothetical 128-bit lane-fixing shuffle mask. Also
+ // check whether the in-128-bit lane shuffles share a repeating pattern.
+ SmallVector<int, 4> Lanes;
+ Lanes.resize(NumLanes, -1);
+ SmallVector<int, 4> InLaneMask;
+ InLaneMask.resize(LaneSize, -1);
+ for (int i = 0; i < Size; ++i) {
+ if (Mask[i] < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ int j = i / LaneSize;
+
+ if (Lanes[j] < 0) {
+ // First entry we've seen for this lane.
+ Lanes[j] = Mask[i] / LaneSize;
+ } else if (Lanes[j] != Mask[i] / LaneSize) {
+ // This doesn't match the lane selected previously!
+ return SDValue();
+ }
+
+ // Check that within each lane we have a consistent shuffle mask.
+ int k = i % LaneSize;
+ if (InLaneMask[k] < 0) {
+ InLaneMask[k] = Mask[i] % LaneSize;
+ } else if (InLaneMask[k] != Mask[i] % LaneSize) {
+ // This doesn't fit a repeating in-lane mask.
+ return SDValue();
+ }
+ }
+
+ // First shuffle the lanes into place.
+ MVT LaneVT = MVT::getVectorVT(VT.isFloatingPoint() ? MVT::f64 : MVT::i64,
+ VT.getSizeInBits() / 64);
+ SmallVector<int, 8> LaneMask;
+ LaneMask.resize(NumLanes * 2, -1);
+ for (int i = 0; i < NumLanes; ++i)
+ if (Lanes[i] >= 0) {
+ LaneMask[2 * i + 0] = 2*Lanes[i] + 0;
+ LaneMask[2 * i + 1] = 2*Lanes[i] + 1;
+ }
+
+ V1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, LaneVT, V1);
+ V2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, LaneVT, V2);
+ SDValue LaneShuffle = DAG.getVectorShuffle(LaneVT, DL, V1, V2, LaneMask);
+
+ // Cast it back to the type we actually want.
+ LaneShuffle = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, LaneShuffle);
+
+ // Now do a simple shuffle that isn't lane crossing.
+ SmallVector<int, 8> NewMask;
+ NewMask.resize(Size, -1);
+ for (int i = 0; i < Size; ++i)
+ if (Mask[i] >= 0)
+ NewMask[i] = (i / LaneSize) * LaneSize + Mask[i] % LaneSize;
+ assert(!is128BitLaneCrossingShuffleMask(VT, NewMask) &&
+ "Must not introduce lane crosses at this point!");
+
+ return DAG.getVectorShuffle(VT, DL, LaneShuffle, DAG.getUNDEF(VT), NewMask);
+}
+
+/// \brief Test whether the specified input (0 or 1) is in-place blended by the
+/// given mask.
+///
+/// This returns true if the elements from a particular input are already in the
+/// slot required by the given mask and require no permutation.
+static bool isShuffleMaskInputInPlace(int Input, ArrayRef<int> Mask) {
+ assert((Input == 0 || Input == 1) && "Only two inputs to shuffles.");
+ int Size = Mask.size();
+ for (int i = 0; i < Size; ++i)
+ if (Mask[i] >= 0 && Mask[i] / Size == Input && Mask[i] % Size != i)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/// \brief Handle lowering of 4-lane 64-bit floating point shuffles.
///
/// Also ends up handling lowering of 4-lane 64-bit integer shuffles when AVX2
DAG.getConstant(SHUFPDMask, MVT::i8));
}
+ // Try to simplify this by merging 128-bit lanes to enable a lane-based
+ // shuffle. However, if we have AVX2 and either inputs are already in place,
+ // we will be able to shuffle even across lanes the other input in a single
+ // instruction so skip this pattern.
+ if (!(Subtarget->hasAVX2() && (isShuffleMaskInputInPlace(0, Mask) ||
+ isShuffleMaskInputInPlace(1, Mask))))
+ if (SDValue Result = lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes(
+ DL, MVT::v4f64, V1, V2, Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
+ return Result;
+
// If we have AVX2 then we always want to lower with a blend because an v4 we
// can fully permute the elements.
if (Subtarget->hasAVX2())
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::VPERMI, DL, MVT::v4i64, V1,
getV4X86ShuffleImm8ForMask(Mask, DAG));
+ // Try to simplify this by merging 128-bit lanes to enable a lane-based
+ // shuffle. However, if we have AVX2 and either inputs are already in place,
+ // we will be able to shuffle even across lanes the other input in a single
+ // instruction so skip this pattern.
+ if (!(Subtarget->hasAVX2() && (isShuffleMaskInputInPlace(0, Mask) ||
+ isShuffleMaskInputInPlace(1, Mask))))
+ if (SDValue Result = lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes(
+ DL, MVT::v4i64, V1, V2, Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
+ return Result;
+
// Otherwise fall back on generic blend lowering.
return lowerVectorShuffleAsDecomposedShuffleBlend(DL, MVT::v4i64, V1, V2,
Mask, DAG);
DAG);
}
+ // Try to simplify this by merging 128-bit lanes to enable a lane-based
+ // shuffle.
+ if (SDValue Result = lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes(
+ DL, MVT::v8f32, V1, V2, Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
+ return Result;
+
// If we have AVX2 then we always want to lower with a blend because at v8 we
// can fully permute the elements.
if (Subtarget->hasAVX2())
DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, DL, MVT::v8i32, VPermMask), V1);
}
+ // Try to simplify this by merging 128-bit lanes to enable a lane-based
+ // shuffle.
+ if (SDValue Result = lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes(
+ DL, MVT::v8i32, V1, V2, Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
+ return Result;
+
// Otherwise fall back on generic blend lowering.
return lowerVectorShuffleAsDecomposedShuffleBlend(DL, MVT::v8i32, V1, V2,
Mask, DAG);
Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
return Broadcast;
- // There are no generalized cross-lane shuffle operations available on i16
- // element types.
- if (is128BitLaneCrossingShuffleMask(MVT::v16i16, Mask))
- return lowerVectorShuffleAsLanePermuteAndBlend(DL, MVT::v16i16, V1, V2,
- Mask, DAG);
-
if (SDValue Blend = lowerVectorShuffleAsBlend(DL, MVT::v16i16, V1, V2, Mask,
Subtarget, DAG))
return Blend;
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::UNPCKH, DL, MVT::v16i16, V1, V2);
if (isSingleInputShuffleMask(Mask)) {
+ // There are no generalized cross-lane shuffle operations available on i16
+ // element types.
+ if (is128BitLaneCrossingShuffleMask(MVT::v16i16, Mask))
+ return lowerVectorShuffleAsLanePermuteAndBlend(DL, MVT::v16i16, V1, V2,
+ Mask, DAG);
+
SDValue PSHUFBMask[32];
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
if (Mask[i] == -1) {
DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, DL, MVT::v32i8, PSHUFBMask)));
}
+ // Try to simplify this by merging 128-bit lanes to enable a lane-based
+ // shuffle.
+ if (SDValue Result = lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes(
+ DL, MVT::v16i16, V1, V2, Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
+ return Result;
+
// Otherwise fall back on generic lowering.
return lowerVectorShuffleAsSplitOrBlend(DL, MVT::v16i16, V1, V2, Mask, DAG);
}
Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
return Broadcast;
- // There are no generalized cross-lane shuffle operations available on i8
- // element types.
- if (is128BitLaneCrossingShuffleMask(MVT::v32i8, Mask))
- return lowerVectorShuffleAsLanePermuteAndBlend(DL, MVT::v32i8, V1, V2,
- Mask, DAG);
-
if (SDValue Blend = lowerVectorShuffleAsBlend(DL, MVT::v32i8, V1, V2, Mask,
Subtarget, DAG))
return Blend;
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::UNPCKH, DL, MVT::v32i8, V1, V2);
if (isSingleInputShuffleMask(Mask)) {
+ // There are no generalized cross-lane shuffle operations available on i8
+ // element types.
+ if (is128BitLaneCrossingShuffleMask(MVT::v32i8, Mask))
+ return lowerVectorShuffleAsLanePermuteAndBlend(DL, MVT::v32i8, V1, V2,
+ Mask, DAG);
+
SDValue PSHUFBMask[32];
for (int i = 0; i < 32; ++i)
PSHUFBMask[i] =
DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_VECTOR, DL, MVT::v32i8, PSHUFBMask));
}
+ // Try to simplify this by merging 128-bit lanes to enable a lane-based
+ // shuffle.
+ if (SDValue Result = lowerVectorShuffleByMerging128BitLanes(
+ DL, MVT::v32i8, V1, V2, Mask, Subtarget, DAG))
+ return Result;
+
// Otherwise fall back on generic lowering.
return lowerVectorShuffleAsSplitOrBlend(DL, MVT::v32i8, V1, V2, Mask, DAG);
}
// When the number of V1 and V2 elements are the same, try to minimize the
// number of uses of V2 in the low half of the vector. When that is tied,
// ensure that the sum of indices for V1 is equal to or lower than the sum
- // indices for V2.
+ // indices for V2. When those are equal, try to ensure that the number of odd
+ // indices for V1 is lower than the number of odd indices for V2.
if (NumV1Elements == NumV2Elements) {
int LowV1Elements = 0, LowV2Elements = 0;
for (int M : SVOp->getMask().slice(0, NumElements / 2))
SumV2Indices += i;
else if (SVOp->getMask()[i] >= 0)
SumV1Indices += i;
- if (SumV2Indices < SumV1Indices)
+ if (SumV2Indices < SumV1Indices) {
return DAG.getCommutedVectorShuffle(*SVOp);
+ } else if (SumV2Indices == SumV1Indices) {
+ int NumV1OddIndices = 0, NumV2OddIndices = 0;
+ for (int i = 0, Size = SVOp->getMask().size(); i < Size; ++i)
+ if (SVOp->getMask()[i] >= NumElements)
+ NumV2OddIndices += i % 2;
+ else if (SVOp->getMask()[i] >= 0)
+ NumV1OddIndices += i % 2;
+ if (NumV2OddIndices < NumV1OddIndices)
+ return DAG.getCommutedVectorShuffle(*SVOp);
+ }
}
}
EVT VecIntVT = V.getValueType();
bool Is128 = VecIntVT == MVT::v4i32;
EVT VecFloatVT = Is128 ? MVT::v4f32 : MVT::v8f32;
+ // If we convert to something else than the supported type, e.g., to v4f64,
+ // abort early.
+ if (VecFloatVT != Op->getValueType(0))
+ return SDValue();
+
unsigned NumElts = VecIntVT.getVectorNumElements();
assert((VecIntVT == MVT::v4i32 || VecIntVT == MVT::v8i32) &&
"Unsupported custom type");
RoundingMode),
Mask, Src0, Subtarget, DAG);
}
-
+ case INTR_TYPE_2OP_MASK: {
+ return getVectorMaskingNode(DAG.getNode(IntrData->Opc0, dl, VT, Op.getOperand(1),
+ Op.getOperand(2)),
+ Op.getOperand(4), Op.getOperand(3), Subtarget, DAG);
+ }
case CMP_MASK:
case CMP_MASK_CC: {
// Comparison intrinsics with masks.
case VSHIFT_MASK:
return getVectorMaskingNode(getTargetVShiftNode(IntrData->Opc0, dl, Op.getSimpleValueType(),
Op.getOperand(1), Op.getOperand(2), DAG),
- Op.getOperand(4), Op.getOperand(3), Subtarget, DAG);;
+ Op.getOperand(4), Op.getOperand(3), Subtarget, DAG);
default:
break;
}
SDValue Callee = DAG.getExternalSymbol(LibcallName, TLI.getPointerTy());
Type *RetTy = isF64
- ? (Type*)StructType::get(ArgTy, ArgTy, NULL)
+ ? (Type*)StructType::get(ArgTy, ArgTy, nullptr)
: (Type*)VectorType::get(ArgTy, 4);
TargetLowering::CallLoweringInfo CLI(DAG);
return (SVT.getVectorNumElements() == 2 ||
ShuffleVectorSDNode::isSplatMask(&M[0], VT) ||
isMOVLMask(M, SVT) ||
+ isCommutedMOVLMask(M, SVT) ||
isMOVHLPSMask(M, SVT) ||
isSHUFPMask(M, SVT) ||
isSHUFPMask(M, SVT, /* Commuted */ true) ||
.addReg(X86::RAX);
}
} else {
- const char *StackProbeSymbol =
- Subtarget->isTargetKnownWindowsMSVC() ? "_chkstk" : "_alloca";
+ const char *StackProbeSymbol = (Subtarget->isTargetKnownWindowsMSVC() ||
+ Subtarget->isTargetWindowsItanium())
+ ? "_chkstk"
+ : "_alloca";
BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(X86::CALLpcrel32))
.addExternalSymbol(StackProbeSymbol)
}
static SDValue
-TransformVSELECTtoBlendVECTOR_SHUFFLE(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
+transformVSELECTtoBlendVECTOR_SHUFFLE(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
const X86Subtarget *Subtarget) {
SDLoc dl(N);
SDValue Cond = N->getOperand(0);
Cond = CondSrc->getOperand(0);
}
- MVT VT = N->getSimpleValueType(0);
- MVT EltVT = VT.getVectorElementType();
- unsigned NumElems = VT.getVectorNumElements();
- // There is no blend with immediate in AVX-512.
- if (VT.is512BitVector())
- return SDValue();
-
- if (!Subtarget->hasSSE41() || EltVT == MVT::i8)
- return SDValue();
- if (!Subtarget->hasInt256() && VT == MVT::v16i16)
- return SDValue();
-
if (!ISD::isBuildVectorOfConstantSDNodes(Cond.getNode()))
return SDValue();
if (!BUILD_VECTORtoBlendMask(cast<BuildVectorSDNode>(Cond), MaskValue))
return SDValue();
+ MVT VT = N->getSimpleValueType(0);
+ unsigned NumElems = VT.getVectorNumElements();
SmallVector<int, 8> ShuffleMask(NumElems, -1);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumElems; ++i) {
// Be sure we emit undef where we can.
ShuffleMask[i] = i + NumElems * ((MaskValue >> i) & 1);
}
+ const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo();
+ if (!TLI.isShuffleMaskLegal(ShuffleMask, VT))
+ return SDValue();
return DAG.getVectorShuffle(VT, dl, LHS, RHS, &ShuffleMask[0]);
}
}
}
- // Try to fold this VSELECT into a MOVSS/MOVSD
- if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::VSELECT &&
- Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::BUILD_VECTOR && !DCI.isBeforeLegalize()) {
- if (VT == MVT::v4i32 || VT == MVT::v4f32 ||
- (Subtarget->hasSSE2() && (VT == MVT::v2i64 || VT == MVT::v2f64))) {
- bool CanFold = false;
- unsigned NumElems = Cond.getNumOperands();
- SDValue A = LHS;
- SDValue B = RHS;
-
- if (isZero(Cond.getOperand(0))) {
- CanFold = true;
-
- // fold (vselect <0,-1,-1,-1>, A, B) -> (movss A, B)
- // fold (vselect <0,-1> -> (movsd A, B)
- for (unsigned i = 1, e = NumElems; i != e && CanFold; ++i)
- CanFold = isAllOnes(Cond.getOperand(i));
- } else if (isAllOnes(Cond.getOperand(0))) {
- CanFold = true;
- std::swap(A, B);
-
- // fold (vselect <-1,0,0,0>, A, B) -> (movss B, A)
- // fold (vselect <-1,0> -> (movsd B, A)
- for (unsigned i = 1, e = NumElems; i != e && CanFold; ++i)
- CanFold = isZero(Cond.getOperand(i));
- }
-
- if (CanFold) {
- if (VT == MVT::v4i32 || VT == MVT::v4f32)
- return getTargetShuffleNode(X86ISD::MOVSS, DL, VT, A, B, DAG);
- return getTargetShuffleNode(X86ISD::MOVSD, DL, VT, A, B, DAG);
- }
-
- if (Subtarget->hasSSE2() && (VT == MVT::v4i32 || VT == MVT::v4f32)) {
- // fold (v4i32: vselect <0,0,-1,-1>, A, B) ->
- // (v4i32 (bitcast (movsd (v2i64 (bitcast A)),
- // (v2i64 (bitcast B)))))
- //
- // fold (v4f32: vselect <0,0,-1,-1>, A, B) ->
- // (v4f32 (bitcast (movsd (v2f64 (bitcast A)),
- // (v2f64 (bitcast B)))))
- //
- // fold (v4i32: vselect <-1,-1,0,0>, A, B) ->
- // (v4i32 (bitcast (movsd (v2i64 (bitcast B)),
- // (v2i64 (bitcast A)))))
- //
- // fold (v4f32: vselect <-1,-1,0,0>, A, B) ->
- // (v4f32 (bitcast (movsd (v2f64 (bitcast B)),
- // (v2f64 (bitcast A)))))
-
- CanFold = (isZero(Cond.getOperand(0)) &&
- isZero(Cond.getOperand(1)) &&
- isAllOnes(Cond.getOperand(2)) &&
- isAllOnes(Cond.getOperand(3)));
-
- if (!CanFold && isAllOnes(Cond.getOperand(0)) &&
- isAllOnes(Cond.getOperand(1)) &&
- isZero(Cond.getOperand(2)) &&
- isZero(Cond.getOperand(3))) {
- CanFold = true;
- std::swap(LHS, RHS);
- }
-
- if (CanFold) {
- EVT NVT = (VT == MVT::v4i32) ? MVT::v2i64 : MVT::v2f64;
- SDValue NewA = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, NVT, LHS);
- SDValue NewB = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, NVT, RHS);
- SDValue Select = getTargetShuffleNode(X86ISD::MOVSD, DL, NVT, NewA,
- NewB, DAG);
- return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, Select);
- }
- }
- }
- }
-
// If we know that this node is legal then we know that it is going to be
// matched by one of the SSE/AVX BLEND instructions. These instructions only
// depend on the highest bit in each word. Try to use SimplifyDemandedBits
if ((N->getOpcode() == ISD::VSELECT ||
N->getOpcode() == X86ISD::SHRUNKBLEND) &&
!DCI.isBeforeLegalize()) {
- SDValue Shuffle = TransformVSELECTtoBlendVECTOR_SHUFFLE(N, DAG, Subtarget);
+ SDValue Shuffle = transformVSELECTtoBlendVECTOR_SHUFFLE(N, DAG, Subtarget);
if (Shuffle.getNode())
return Shuffle;
}
SDLoc dl(Ld);
const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo();
- // On Sandybridge unaligned 256bit loads are inefficient.
+ // For chips with slow 32-byte unaligned loads, break the 32-byte operation
+ // into two 16-byte operations.
ISD::LoadExtType Ext = Ld->getExtensionType();
unsigned Alignment = Ld->getAlignment();
bool IsAligned = Alignment == 0 || Alignment >= MemVT.getSizeInBits()/8;
- if (RegVT.is256BitVector() && !Subtarget->hasInt256() &&
+ if (RegVT.is256BitVector() && Subtarget->isUnalignedMem32Slow() &&
!DCI.isBeforeLegalizeOps() && !IsAligned && Ext == ISD::NON_EXTLOAD) {
unsigned NumElems = RegVT.getVectorNumElements();
if (NumElems < 2)
SDValue StoredVal = St->getOperand(1);
const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo();
- // If we are saving a concatenation of two XMM registers, perform two stores.
- // On Sandy Bridge, 256-bit memory operations are executed by two
- // 128-bit ports. However, on Haswell it is better to issue a single 256-bit
- // memory operation.
+ // If we are saving a concatenation of two XMM registers and 32-byte stores
+ // are slow, such as on Sandy Bridge, perform two 16-byte stores.
unsigned Alignment = St->getAlignment();
bool IsAligned = Alignment == 0 || Alignment >= VT.getSizeInBits()/8;
- if (VT.is256BitVector() && !Subtarget->hasInt256() &&
+ if (VT.is256BitVector() && Subtarget->isUnalignedMem32Slow() &&
StVT == VT && !IsAligned) {
unsigned NumElems = VT.getVectorNumElements();
if (NumElems < 2)
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff