[X86] Part 1 to fix x86-64 fp128 calling convention.

[oota-llvm.git] / lib / CodeGen / SelectionDAG / LegalizeDAG.cpp

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
index 8238cdeb59caccbf015a22bc8897b2df818f0cee..3393e17b8e097c910d1a0a488f4c5abc0a70fd7e 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ private:
   SDValue ExpandVectorBuildThroughStack(SDNode* Node);
 
   SDValue ExpandConstantFP(ConstantFPSDNode *CFP, bool UseCP);
+  SDValue ExpandConstant(ConstantSDNode *CP);
 
   // if ExpandNode returns false, LegalizeOp falls back to ConvertNodeToLibcall
   bool ExpandNode(SDNode *Node);
@@ -294,6 +295,20 @@ SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandConstantFP(ConstantFPSDNode *CFP, bool UseCP) {
   return Result;
 }
 
+/// Expands the Constant node to a load from the constant pool.
+SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandConstant(ConstantSDNode *CP) {
+  SDLoc dl(CP);
+  EVT VT = CP->getValueType(0);
+  SDValue CPIdx = DAG.getConstantPool(CP->getConstantIntValue(),
+                                      TLI.getPointerTy(DAG.getDataLayout()));
+  unsigned Alignment = cast<ConstantPoolSDNode>(CPIdx)->getAlignment();
+  SDValue Result =
+    DAG.getLoad(VT, dl, DAG.getEntryNode(), CPIdx,
+                MachinePointerInfo::getConstantPool(DAG.getMachineFunction()),
+                false, false, false, Alignment);
+  return Result;
+}
+
 /// Expands an unaligned store to 2 half-size stores.
 static void ExpandUnalignedStore(StoreSDNode *ST, SelectionDAG &DAG,
                                  const TargetLowering &TLI,
@@ -1192,15 +1207,17 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDNode *Node) {
 
 #ifndef NDEBUG
   for (unsigned i = 0, e = Node->getNumValues(); i != e; ++i)
-    assert(TLI.getTypeAction(*DAG.getContext(), Node->getValueType(i)) ==
-             TargetLowering::TypeLegal &&
+    assert((TLI.getTypeAction(*DAG.getContext(), Node->getValueType(i)) ==
+              TargetLowering::TypeLegal ||
+            TLI.isTypeLegal(Node->getValueType(i))) &&
            "Unexpected illegal type!");
 
   for (const SDValue &Op : Node->op_values())
-    assert((TLI.getTypeAction(*DAG.getContext(),
-                              Op.getValueType()) == TargetLowering::TypeLegal ||
-                              Op.getOpcode() == ISD::TargetConstant) &&
-                              "Unexpected illegal type!");
+    assert((TLI.getTypeAction(*DAG.getContext(), Op.getValueType()) ==
+              TargetLowering::TypeLegal ||
+            TLI.isTypeLegal(Op.getValueType()) ||
+            Op.getOpcode() == ISD::TargetConstant) &&
+            "Unexpected illegal type!");
 #endif
 
   // Figure out the correct action; the way to query this varies by opcode
@@ -3390,6 +3407,11 @@ bool SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(SDNode *Node) {
       Results.push_back(ExpandConstantFP(CFP, true));
     break;
   }
+  case ISD::Constant: {
+    ConstantSDNode *CP = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Node);
+    Results.push_back(ExpandConstant(CP));
+    break;
+  }
   case ISD::FSUB: {
     EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0);
     if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::FADD, VT) &&