//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#define DEBUG_TYPE "sched-instrs"
-#include "ScheduleDAGInstrs.h"
#include "llvm/Operator.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineMemOperand.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/PseudoSourceValue.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterPressure.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCInstrItineraries.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetSubtargetInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
using namespace llvm;
+static cl::opt<bool> EnableAASchedMI("enable-aa-sched-mi", cl::Hidden,
+ cl::ZeroOrMore, cl::init(false),
+ cl::desc("Enable use of AA during MI GAD construction"));
+
ScheduleDAGInstrs::ScheduleDAGInstrs(MachineFunction &mf,
const MachineLoopInfo &mli,
- const MachineDominatorTree &mdt)
+ const MachineDominatorTree &mdt,
+ bool IsPostRAFlag,
+ LiveIntervals *lis)
: ScheduleDAG(mf), MLI(mli), MDT(mdt), MFI(mf.getFrameInfo()),
- InstrItins(mf.getTarget().getInstrItineraryData()),
- Defs(TRI->getNumRegs()), Uses(TRI->getNumRegs()),
- LoopRegs(MLI, MDT), FirstDbgValue(0) {
+ InstrItins(mf.getTarget().getInstrItineraryData()), LIS(lis),
+ IsPostRA(IsPostRAFlag), UnitLatencies(false), CanHandleTerminators(false),
+ LoopRegs(MDT), FirstDbgValue(0) {
+ assert((IsPostRA || LIS) && "PreRA scheduling requires LiveIntervals");
DbgValues.clear();
-}
+ assert(!(IsPostRA && MRI.getNumVirtRegs()) &&
+ "Virtual registers must be removed prior to PostRA scheduling");
-/// Run - perform scheduling.
-///
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::Run(MachineBasicBlock *bb,
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator begin,
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator end,
- unsigned endcount) {
- BB = bb;
- Begin = begin;
- InsertPosIndex = endcount;
-
- ScheduleDAG::Run(bb, end);
+ const TargetSubtargetInfo &ST = TM.getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>();
+ SchedModel.init(*ST.getSchedModel(), &ST, TII);
}
/// getUnderlyingObjectFromInt - This is the function that does the work of
return 0;
}
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::StartBlock(MachineBasicBlock *BB) {
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::startBlock(MachineBasicBlock *bb) {
+ BB = bb;
+ LoopRegs.Deps.clear();
if (MachineLoop *ML = MLI.getLoopFor(BB))
- if (BB == ML->getLoopLatch()) {
- MachineBasicBlock *Header = ML->getHeader();
- for (MachineBasicBlock::livein_iterator I = Header->livein_begin(),
- E = Header->livein_end(); I != E; ++I)
- LoopLiveInRegs.insert(*I);
+ if (BB == ML->getLoopLatch())
LoopRegs.VisitLoop(ML);
- }
}
-/// AddSchedBarrierDeps - Add dependencies from instructions in the current
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::finishBlock() {
+ // Subclasses should no longer refer to the old block.
+ BB = 0;
+}
+
+/// Initialize the map with the number of registers.
+void Reg2SUnitsMap::setRegLimit(unsigned Limit) {
+ PhysRegSet.setUniverse(Limit);
+ SUnits.resize(Limit);
+}
+
+/// Clear the map without deallocating storage.
+void Reg2SUnitsMap::clear() {
+ for (const_iterator I = reg_begin(), E = reg_end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ SUnits[*I].clear();
+ }
+ PhysRegSet.clear();
+}
+
+/// Initialize the DAG and common scheduler state for the current scheduling
+/// region. This does not actually create the DAG, only clears it. The
+/// scheduling driver may call BuildSchedGraph multiple times per scheduling
+/// region.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::enterRegion(MachineBasicBlock *bb,
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator begin,
+ MachineBasicBlock::iterator end,
+ unsigned endcount) {
+ assert(bb == BB && "startBlock should set BB");
+ RegionBegin = begin;
+ RegionEnd = end;
+ EndIndex = endcount;
+ MISUnitMap.clear();
+
+ // Check to see if the scheduler cares about latencies.
+ UnitLatencies = forceUnitLatencies();
+
+ ScheduleDAG::clearDAG();
+}
+
+/// Close the current scheduling region. Don't clear any state in case the
+/// driver wants to refer to the previous scheduling region.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::exitRegion() {
+ // Nothing to do.
+}
+
+/// addSchedBarrierDeps - Add dependencies from instructions in the current
/// list of instructions being scheduled to scheduling barrier by adding
/// the exit SU to the register defs and use list. This is because we want to
/// make sure instructions which define registers that are either used by
/// especially important when the definition latency of the return value(s)
/// are too high to be hidden by the branch or when the liveout registers
/// used by instructions in the fallthrough block.
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::AddSchedBarrierDeps() {
- MachineInstr *ExitMI = InsertPos != BB->end() ? &*InsertPos : 0;
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addSchedBarrierDeps() {
+ MachineInstr *ExitMI = RegionEnd != BB->end() ? &*RegionEnd : 0;
ExitSU.setInstr(ExitMI);
bool AllDepKnown = ExitMI &&
- (ExitMI->getDesc().isCall() || ExitMI->getDesc().isBarrier());
+ (ExitMI->isCall() || ExitMI->isBarrier());
if (ExitMI && AllDepKnown) {
// If it's a call or a barrier, add dependencies on the defs and uses of
// instruction.
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (Reg == 0) continue;
- assert(TRI->isPhysicalRegister(Reg) && "Virtual register encountered!");
- Uses[Reg].push_back(&ExitSU);
+ if (TRI->isPhysicalRegister(Reg))
+ Uses[Reg].push_back(PhysRegSUOper(&ExitSU, -1));
+ else {
+ assert(!IsPostRA && "Virtual register encountered after regalloc.");
+ addVRegUseDeps(&ExitSU, i);
+ }
}
} else {
// For others, e.g. fallthrough, conditional branch, assume the exit
// uses all the registers that are livein to the successor blocks.
- SmallSet<unsigned, 8> Seen;
+ assert(Uses.empty() && "Uses in set before adding deps?");
for (MachineBasicBlock::succ_iterator SI = BB->succ_begin(),
SE = BB->succ_end(); SI != SE; ++SI)
for (MachineBasicBlock::livein_iterator I = (*SI)->livein_begin(),
E = (*SI)->livein_end(); I != E; ++I) {
unsigned Reg = *I;
- if (Seen.insert(Reg))
- Uses[Reg].push_back(&ExitSU);
+ if (!Uses.contains(Reg))
+ Uses[Reg].push_back(PhysRegSUOper(&ExitSU, -1));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/// MO is an operand of SU's instruction that defines a physical register. Add
+/// data dependencies from SU to any uses of the physical register.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDataDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
+ const MachineOperand &MO = SU->getInstr()->getOperand(OperIdx);
+ assert(MO.isDef() && "expect physreg def");
+
+ // Ask the target if address-backscheduling is desirable, and if so how much.
+ const TargetSubtargetInfo &ST = TM.getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>();
+ unsigned SpecialAddressLatency = ST.getSpecialAddressLatency();
+ unsigned DataLatency = SU->Latency;
+
+ for (MCRegAliasIterator Alias(MO.getReg(), TRI, true);
+ Alias.isValid(); ++Alias) {
+ if (!Uses.contains(*Alias))
+ continue;
+ std::vector<PhysRegSUOper> &UseList = Uses[*Alias];
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = UseList.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ SUnit *UseSU = UseList[i].SU;
+ if (UseSU == SU)
+ continue;
+ MachineInstr *UseMI = UseSU->getInstr();
+ int UseOp = UseList[i].OpIdx;
+ unsigned LDataLatency = DataLatency;
+ // Optionally add in a special extra latency for nodes that
+ // feed addresses.
+ // TODO: Perhaps we should get rid of
+ // SpecialAddressLatency and just move this into
+ // adjustSchedDependency for the targets that care about it.
+ if (SpecialAddressLatency != 0 && !UnitLatencies &&
+ UseSU != &ExitSU) {
+ const MCInstrDesc &UseMCID = UseMI->getDesc();
+ int RegUseIndex = UseMI->findRegisterUseOperandIdx(*Alias);
+ assert(RegUseIndex >= 0 && "UseMI doesn't use register!");
+ if (RegUseIndex >= 0 &&
+ (UseMI->mayLoad() || UseMI->mayStore()) &&
+ (unsigned)RegUseIndex < UseMCID.getNumOperands() &&
+ UseMCID.OpInfo[RegUseIndex].isLookupPtrRegClass())
+ LDataLatency += SpecialAddressLatency;
+ }
+ // Adjust the dependence latency using operand def/use
+ // information (if any), and then allow the target to
+ // perform its own adjustments.
+ SDep dep(SU, SDep::Data, LDataLatency, *Alias);
+ if (!UnitLatencies) {
+ MachineInstr *RegUse = UseOp < 0 ? 0 : UseMI;
+ dep.setLatency(
+ SchedModel.computeOperandLatency(SU->getInstr(), OperIdx,
+ RegUse, UseOp, /*FindMin=*/false));
+ dep.setMinLatency(
+ SchedModel.computeOperandLatency(SU->getInstr(), OperIdx,
+ RegUse, UseOp, /*FindMin=*/true));
+
+ ST.adjustSchedDependency(SU, UseSU, dep);
+ }
+ UseSU->addPred(dep);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/// addPhysRegDeps - Add register dependencies (data, anti, and output) from
+/// this SUnit to following instructions in the same scheduling region that
+/// depend the physical register referenced at OperIdx.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
+ const MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr();
+ const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(OperIdx);
+
+ // Optionally add output and anti dependencies. For anti
+ // dependencies we use a latency of 0 because for a multi-issue
+ // target we want to allow the defining instruction to issue
+ // in the same cycle as the using instruction.
+ // TODO: Using a latency of 1 here for output dependencies assumes
+ // there's no cost for reusing registers.
+ SDep::Kind Kind = MO.isUse() ? SDep::Anti : SDep::Output;
+ for (MCRegAliasIterator Alias(MO.getReg(), TRI, true);
+ Alias.isValid(); ++Alias) {
+ if (!Defs.contains(*Alias))
+ continue;
+ std::vector<PhysRegSUOper> &DefList = Defs[*Alias];
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = DefList.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ SUnit *DefSU = DefList[i].SU;
+ if (DefSU == &ExitSU)
+ continue;
+ if (DefSU != SU &&
+ (Kind != SDep::Output || !MO.isDead() ||
+ !DefSU->getInstr()->registerDefIsDead(*Alias))) {
+ if (Kind == SDep::Anti)
+ DefSU->addPred(SDep(SU, Kind, 0, /*Reg=*/*Alias));
+ else {
+ unsigned AOLat = TII->getOutputLatency(InstrItins, MI, OperIdx,
+ DefSU->getInstr());
+ DefSU->addPred(SDep(SU, Kind, AOLat, /*Reg=*/*Alias));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!MO.isDef()) {
+ // Either insert a new Reg2SUnits entry with an empty SUnits list, or
+ // retrieve the existing SUnits list for this register's uses.
+ // Push this SUnit on the use list.
+ Uses[MO.getReg()].push_back(PhysRegSUOper(SU, OperIdx));
+ }
+ else {
+ addPhysRegDataDeps(SU, OperIdx);
+
+ // Either insert a new Reg2SUnits entry with an empty SUnits list, or
+ // retrieve the existing SUnits list for this register's defs.
+ std::vector<PhysRegSUOper> &DefList = Defs[MO.getReg()];
+
+ // If a def is going to wrap back around to the top of the loop,
+ // backschedule it.
+ if (!UnitLatencies && DefList.empty()) {
+ LoopDependencies::LoopDeps::iterator I = LoopRegs.Deps.find(MO.getReg());
+ if (I != LoopRegs.Deps.end()) {
+ const MachineOperand *UseMO = I->second.first;
+ unsigned Count = I->second.second;
+ const MachineInstr *UseMI = UseMO->getParent();
+ unsigned UseMOIdx = UseMO - &UseMI->getOperand(0);
+ const MCInstrDesc &UseMCID = UseMI->getDesc();
+ const TargetSubtargetInfo &ST =
+ TM.getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>();
+ unsigned SpecialAddressLatency = ST.getSpecialAddressLatency();
+ // TODO: If we knew the total depth of the region here, we could
+ // handle the case where the whole loop is inside the region but
+ // is large enough that the isScheduleHigh trick isn't needed.
+ if (UseMOIdx < UseMCID.getNumOperands()) {
+ // Currently, we only support scheduling regions consisting of
+ // single basic blocks. Check to see if the instruction is in
+ // the same region by checking to see if it has the same parent.
+ if (UseMI->getParent() != MI->getParent()) {
+ unsigned Latency = SU->Latency;
+ if (UseMCID.OpInfo[UseMOIdx].isLookupPtrRegClass())
+ Latency += SpecialAddressLatency;
+ // This is a wild guess as to the portion of the latency which
+ // will be overlapped by work done outside the current
+ // scheduling region.
+ Latency -= std::min(Latency, Count);
+ // Add the artificial edge.
+ ExitSU.addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, Latency,
+ /*Reg=*/0, /*isNormalMemory=*/false,
+ /*isMustAlias=*/false,
+ /*isArtificial=*/true));
+ } else if (SpecialAddressLatency > 0 &&
+ UseMCID.OpInfo[UseMOIdx].isLookupPtrRegClass()) {
+ // The entire loop body is within the current scheduling region
+ // and the latency of this operation is assumed to be greater
+ // than the latency of the loop.
+ // TODO: Recursively mark data-edge predecessors as
+ // isScheduleHigh too.
+ SU->isScheduleHigh = true;
+ }
+ }
+ LoopRegs.Deps.erase(I);
}
+ }
+
+ // clear this register's use list
+ if (Uses.contains(MO.getReg()))
+ Uses[MO.getReg()].clear();
+
+ if (!MO.isDead())
+ DefList.clear();
+
+ // Calls will not be reordered because of chain dependencies (see
+ // below). Since call operands are dead, calls may continue to be added
+ // to the DefList making dependence checking quadratic in the size of
+ // the block. Instead, we leave only one call at the back of the
+ // DefList.
+ if (SU->isCall) {
+ while (!DefList.empty() && DefList.back().SU->isCall)
+ DefList.pop_back();
+ }
+ // Defs are pushed in the order they are visited and never reordered.
+ DefList.push_back(PhysRegSUOper(SU, OperIdx));
+ }
+}
+
+/// addVRegDefDeps - Add register output and data dependencies from this SUnit
+/// to instructions that occur later in the same scheduling region if they read
+/// from or write to the virtual register defined at OperIdx.
+///
+/// TODO: Hoist loop induction variable increments. This has to be
+/// reevaluated. Generally, IV scheduling should be done before coalescing.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegDefDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
+ const MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr();
+ unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(OperIdx).getReg();
+
+ // Singly defined vregs do not have output/anti dependencies.
+ // The current operand is a def, so we have at least one.
+ // Check here if there are any others...
+ if (MRI.hasOneDef(Reg))
+ return;
+
+ // Add output dependence to the next nearest def of this vreg.
+ //
+ // Unless this definition is dead, the output dependence should be
+ // transitively redundant with antidependencies from this definition's
+ // uses. We're conservative for now until we have a way to guarantee the uses
+ // are not eliminated sometime during scheduling. The output dependence edge
+ // is also useful if output latency exceeds def-use latency.
+ VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = VRegDefs.find(Reg);
+ if (DefI == VRegDefs.end())
+ VRegDefs.insert(VReg2SUnit(Reg, SU));
+ else {
+ SUnit *DefSU = DefI->SU;
+ if (DefSU != SU && DefSU != &ExitSU) {
+ unsigned OutLatency = TII->getOutputLatency(InstrItins, MI, OperIdx,
+ DefSU->getInstr());
+ DefSU->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Output, OutLatency, Reg));
+ }
+ DefI->SU = SU;
+ }
+}
+
+/// addVRegUseDeps - Add a register data dependency if the instruction that
+/// defines the virtual register used at OperIdx is mapped to an SUnit. Add a
+/// register antidependency from this SUnit to instructions that occur later in
+/// the same scheduling region if they write the virtual register.
+///
+/// TODO: Handle ExitSU "uses" properly.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegUseDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
+ MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr();
+ unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(OperIdx).getReg();
+
+ // Lookup this operand's reaching definition.
+ assert(LIS && "vreg dependencies requires LiveIntervals");
+ LiveRangeQuery LRQ(LIS->getInterval(Reg), LIS->getInstructionIndex(MI));
+ VNInfo *VNI = LRQ.valueIn();
+
+ // VNI will be valid because MachineOperand::readsReg() is checked by caller.
+ assert(VNI && "No value to read by operand");
+ MachineInstr *Def = LIS->getInstructionFromIndex(VNI->def);
+ // Phis and other noninstructions (after coalescing) have a NULL Def.
+ if (Def) {
+ SUnit *DefSU = getSUnit(Def);
+ if (DefSU) {
+ // The reaching Def lives within this scheduling region.
+ // Create a data dependence.
+ //
+ // TODO: Handle "special" address latencies cleanly.
+ SDep dep(DefSU, SDep::Data, DefSU->Latency, Reg);
+ if (!UnitLatencies) {
+ // Adjust the dependence latency using operand def/use information, then
+ // allow the target to perform its own adjustments.
+ int DefOp = Def->findRegisterDefOperandIdx(Reg);
+ dep.setLatency(
+ SchedModel.computeOperandLatency(Def, DefOp, MI, OperIdx, false));
+ dep.setMinLatency(
+ SchedModel.computeOperandLatency(Def, DefOp, MI, OperIdx, true));
+
+ const TargetSubtargetInfo &ST = TM.getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>();
+ ST.adjustSchedDependency(DefSU, SU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
+ }
+ SU->addPred(dep);
+ }
}
+
+ // Add antidependence to the following def of the vreg it uses.
+ VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = VRegDefs.find(Reg);
+ if (DefI != VRegDefs.end() && DefI->SU != SU)
+ DefI->SU->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Anti, 0, Reg));
+}
+
+/// Return true if MI is an instruction we are unable to reason about
+/// (like a call or something with unmodeled side effects).
+static inline bool isGlobalMemoryObject(AliasAnalysis *AA, MachineInstr *MI) {
+ if (MI->isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() ||
+ (MI->hasOrderedMemoryRef() &&
+ (!MI->mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA))))
+ return true;
+ return false;
}
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::BuildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
- // We'll be allocating one SUnit for each instruction, plus one for
- // the region exit node.
+// This MI might have either incomplete info, or known to be unsafe
+// to deal with (i.e. volatile object).
+static inline bool isUnsafeMemoryObject(MachineInstr *MI,
+ const MachineFrameInfo *MFI) {
+ if (!MI || MI->memoperands_empty())
+ return true;
+ // We purposefully do no check for hasOneMemOperand() here
+ // in hope to trigger an assert downstream in order to
+ // finish implementation.
+ if ((*MI->memoperands_begin())->isVolatile() ||
+ MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects())
+ return true;
+
+ const Value *V = (*MI->memoperands_begin())->getValue();
+ if (!V)
+ return true;
+
+ V = getUnderlyingObject(V);
+ if (const PseudoSourceValue *PSV = dyn_cast<PseudoSourceValue>(V)) {
+ // Similarly to getUnderlyingObjectForInstr:
+ // For now, ignore PseudoSourceValues which may alias LLVM IR values
+ // because the code that uses this function has no way to cope with
+ // such aliases.
+ if (PSV->isAliased(MFI))
+ return true;
+ }
+ // Does this pointer refer to a distinct and identifiable object?
+ if (!isIdentifiedObject(V))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/// This returns true if the two MIs need a chain edge betwee them.
+/// If these are not even memory operations, we still may need
+/// chain deps between them. The question really is - could
+/// these two MIs be reordered during scheduling from memory dependency
+/// point of view.
+static bool MIsNeedChainEdge(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ MachineInstr *MIa,
+ MachineInstr *MIb) {
+ // Cover a trivial case - no edge is need to itself.
+ if (MIa == MIb)
+ return false;
+
+ if (isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIa, MFI) || isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIb, MFI))
+ return true;
+
+ // If we are dealing with two "normal" loads, we do not need an edge
+ // between them - they could be reordered.
+ if (!MIa->mayStore() && !MIb->mayStore())
+ return false;
+
+ // To this point analysis is generic. From here on we do need AA.
+ if (!AA)
+ return true;
+
+ MachineMemOperand *MMOa = *MIa->memoperands_begin();
+ MachineMemOperand *MMOb = *MIb->memoperands_begin();
+
+ // FIXME: Need to handle multiple memory operands to support all targets.
+ if (!MIa->hasOneMemOperand() || !MIb->hasOneMemOperand())
+ llvm_unreachable("Multiple memory operands.");
+
+ // The following interface to AA is fashioned after DAGCombiner::isAlias
+ // and operates with MachineMemOperand offset with some important
+ // assumptions:
+ // - LLVM fundamentally assumes flat address spaces.
+ // - MachineOperand offset can *only* result from legalization and
+ // cannot affect queries other than the trivial case of overlap
+ // checking.
+ // - These offsets never wrap and never step outside
+ // of allocated objects.
+ // - There should never be any negative offsets here.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Modify API to hide this math from "user"
+ // FIXME: Even before we go to AA we can reason locally about some
+ // memory objects. It can save compile time, and possibly catch some
+ // corner cases not currently covered.
+
+ assert ((MMOa->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset");
+ assert ((MMOb->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset");
+
+ int64_t MinOffset = std::min(MMOa->getOffset(), MMOb->getOffset());
+ int64_t Overlapa = MMOa->getSize() + MMOa->getOffset() - MinOffset;
+ int64_t Overlapb = MMOb->getSize() + MMOb->getOffset() - MinOffset;
+
+ AliasAnalysis::AliasResult AAResult = AA->alias(
+ AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOa->getValue(), Overlapa,
+ MMOa->getTBAAInfo()),
+ AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOb->getValue(), Overlapb,
+ MMOb->getTBAAInfo()));
+
+ return (AAResult != AliasAnalysis::NoAlias);
+}
+
+/// This recursive function iterates over chain deps of SUb looking for
+/// "latest" node that needs a chain edge to SUa.
+static unsigned
+iterateChainSucc(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb, SUnit *ExitSU, unsigned *Depth,
+ SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> &Visited) {
+ if (!SUa || !SUb || SUb == ExitSU)
+ return *Depth;
+
+ // Remember visited nodes.
+ if (!Visited.insert(SUb))
+ return *Depth;
+ // If there is _some_ dependency already in place, do not
+ // descend any further.
+ // TODO: Need to make sure that if that dependency got eliminated or ignored
+ // for any reason in the future, we would not violate DAG topology.
+ // Currently it does not happen, but makes an implicit assumption about
+ // future implementation.
+ //
+ // Independently, if we encounter node that is some sort of global
+ // object (like a call) we already have full set of dependencies to it
+ // and we can stop descending.
+ if (SUa->isSucc(SUb) ||
+ isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, SUb->getInstr()))
+ return *Depth;
+
+ // If we do need an edge, or we have exceeded depth budget,
+ // add that edge to the predecessors chain of SUb,
+ // and stop descending.
+ if (*Depth > 200 ||
+ MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr())) {
+ SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
+ /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ return *Depth;
+ }
+ // Track current depth.
+ (*Depth)++;
+ // Iterate over chain dependencies only.
+ for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator I = SUb->Succs.begin(), E = SUb->Succs.end();
+ I != E; ++I)
+ if (I->isCtrl())
+ iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SUa, I->getSUnit(), ExitSU, Depth, Visited);
+ return *Depth;
+}
+
+/// This function assumes that "downward" from SU there exist
+/// tail/leaf of already constructed DAG. It iterates downward and
+/// checks whether SU can be aliasing any node dominated
+/// by it.
+static void adjustChainDeps(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SU, SUnit *ExitSU, std::set<SUnit *> &CheckList,
+ unsigned LatencyToLoad) {
+ if (!SU)
+ return;
+
+ SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> Visited;
+ unsigned Depth = 0;
+
+ for (std::set<SUnit *>::iterator I = CheckList.begin(), IE = CheckList.end();
+ I != IE; ++I) {
+ if (SU == *I)
+ continue;
+ if (MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SU->getInstr(), (*I)->getInstr())) {
+ unsigned Latency = ((*I)->getInstr()->mayLoad()) ? LatencyToLoad : 0;
+ (*I)->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, Latency, /*Reg=*/0,
+ /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ }
+ // Now go through all the chain successors and iterate from them.
+ // Keep track of visited nodes.
+ for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator J = (*I)->Succs.begin(),
+ JE = (*I)->Succs.end(); J != JE; ++J)
+ if (J->isCtrl())
+ iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SU, J->getSUnit(),
+ ExitSU, &Depth, Visited);
+ }
+}
+
+/// Check whether two objects need a chain edge, if so, add it
+/// otherwise remember the rejected SU.
+static inline
+void addChainDependency (AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb,
+ std::set<SUnit *> &RejectList,
+ unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0,
+ bool isNormalMemory = false) {
+ // If this is a false dependency,
+ // do not add the edge, but rememeber the rejected node.
+ if (!EnableAASchedMI ||
+ MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr()))
+ SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency, /*Reg=*/0,
+ isNormalMemory));
+ else {
+ // Duplicate entries should be ignored.
+ RejectList.insert(SUb);
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tReject chain dep between SU("
+ << SUa->NodeNum << ") and SU("
+ << SUb->NodeNum << ")\n");
+ }
+}
+
+/// Create an SUnit for each real instruction, numbered in top-down toplological
+/// order. The instruction order A < B, implies that no edge exists from B to A.
+///
+/// Map each real instruction to its SUnit.
+///
+/// After initSUnits, the SUnits vector cannot be resized and the scheduler may
+/// hang onto SUnit pointers. We may relax this in the future by using SUnit IDs
+/// instead of pointers.
+///
+/// MachineScheduler relies on initSUnits numbering the nodes by their order in
+/// the original instruction list.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::initSUnits() {
+ // We'll be allocating one SUnit for each real instruction in the region,
+ // which is contained within a basic block.
SUnits.reserve(BB->size());
+ for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = RegionBegin; I != RegionEnd; ++I) {
+ MachineInstr *MI = I;
+ if (MI->isDebugValue())
+ continue;
+
+ SUnit *SU = newSUnit(MI);
+ MISUnitMap[MI] = SU;
+
+ SU->isCall = MI->isCall();
+ SU->isCommutable = MI->isCommutable();
+
+ // Assign the Latency field of SU using target-provided information.
+ if (UnitLatencies)
+ SU->Latency = 1;
+ else
+ computeLatency(SU);
+ }
+}
+
+/// If RegPressure is non null, compute register pressure as a side effect. The
+/// DAG builder is an efficient place to do it because it already visits
+/// operands.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA,
+ RegPressureTracker *RPTracker) {
+ // Create an SUnit for each real instruction.
+ initSUnits();
+
// We build scheduling units by walking a block's instruction list from bottom
// to top.
// that are known not to alias
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *> AliasMemDefs, NonAliasMemDefs;
std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> > AliasMemUses, NonAliasMemUses;
-
- // Check to see if the scheduler cares about latencies.
- bool UnitLatencies = ForceUnitLatencies();
-
- // Ask the target if address-backscheduling is desirable, and if so how much.
- const TargetSubtargetInfo &ST = TM.getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>();
- unsigned SpecialAddressLatency = ST.getSpecialAddressLatency();
+ std::set<SUnit*> RejectMemNodes;
// Remove any stale debug info; sometimes BuildSchedGraph is called again
// without emitting the info from the previous call.
DbgValues.clear();
FirstDbgValue = NULL;
+ assert(Defs.empty() && Uses.empty() &&
+ "Only BuildGraph should update Defs/Uses");
+ Defs.setRegLimit(TRI->getNumRegs());
+ Uses.setRegLimit(TRI->getNumRegs());
+
+ assert(VRegDefs.empty() && "Only BuildSchedGraph may access VRegDefs");
+ // FIXME: Allow SparseSet to reserve space for the creation of virtual
+ // registers during scheduling. Don't artificially inflate the Universe
+ // because we want to assert that vregs are not created during DAG building.
+ VRegDefs.setUniverse(MRI.getNumVirtRegs());
+
// Model data dependencies between instructions being scheduled and the
// ExitSU.
- AddSchedBarrierDeps();
-
- for (int i = 0, e = TRI->getNumRegs(); i != e; ++i) {
- assert(Defs[i].empty() && "Only BuildGraph should push/pop Defs");
- }
+ addSchedBarrierDeps();
// Walk the list of instructions, from bottom moving up.
MachineInstr *PrevMI = NULL;
- for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MII = InsertPos, MIE = Begin;
+ for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MII = RegionEnd, MIE = RegionBegin;
MII != MIE; --MII) {
MachineInstr *MI = prior(MII);
if (MI && PrevMI) {
PrevMI = MI;
continue;
}
+ if (RPTracker) {
+ RPTracker->recede();
+ assert(RPTracker->getPos() == prior(MII) && "RPTracker can't find MI");
+ }
- const MCInstrDesc &MCID = MI->getDesc();
- assert(!MCID.isTerminator() && !MI->isLabel() &&
+ assert((!MI->isTerminator() || CanHandleTerminators) && !MI->isLabel() &&
"Cannot schedule terminators or labels!");
- // Create the SUnit for this MI.
- SUnit *SU = NewSUnit(MI);
- SU->isCall = MCID.isCall();
- SU->isCommutable = MCID.isCommutable();
- // Assign the Latency field of SU using target-provided information.
- if (UnitLatencies)
- SU->Latency = 1;
- else
- ComputeLatency(SU);
+ SUnit *SU = MISUnitMap[MI];
+ assert(SU && "No SUnit mapped to this MI");
// Add register-based dependencies (data, anti, and output).
for (unsigned j = 0, n = MI->getNumOperands(); j != n; ++j) {
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (Reg == 0) continue;
- assert(TRI->isPhysicalRegister(Reg) && "Virtual register encountered!");
-
- std::vector<SUnit *> &UseList = Uses[Reg];
- // Defs are push in the order they are visited and never reordered.
- std::vector<SUnit *> &DefList = Defs[Reg];
- // Optionally add output and anti dependencies. For anti
- // dependencies we use a latency of 0 because for a multi-issue
- // target we want to allow the defining instruction to issue
- // in the same cycle as the using instruction.
- // TODO: Using a latency of 1 here for output dependencies assumes
- // there's no cost for reusing registers.
- SDep::Kind Kind = MO.isUse() ? SDep::Anti : SDep::Output;
- unsigned AOLatency = (Kind == SDep::Anti) ? 0 : 1;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = DefList.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- SUnit *DefSU = DefList[i];
- if (DefSU == &ExitSU)
- continue;
- if (DefSU != SU &&
- (Kind != SDep::Output || !MO.isDead() ||
- !DefSU->getInstr()->registerDefIsDead(Reg)))
- DefSU->addPred(SDep(SU, Kind, AOLatency, /*Reg=*/Reg));
- }
- for (const unsigned *Alias = TRI->getAliasSet(Reg); *Alias; ++Alias) {
- std::vector<SUnit *> &MemDefList = Defs[*Alias];
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = MemDefList.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- SUnit *DefSU = MemDefList[i];
- if (DefSU == &ExitSU)
- continue;
- if (DefSU != SU &&
- (Kind != SDep::Output || !MO.isDead() ||
- !DefSU->getInstr()->registerDefIsDead(*Alias)))
- DefSU->addPred(SDep(SU, Kind, AOLatency, /*Reg=*/ *Alias));
- }
- }
-
- if (MO.isDef()) {
- // Add any data dependencies.
- unsigned DataLatency = SU->Latency;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = UseList.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- SUnit *UseSU = UseList[i];
- if (UseSU == SU)
- continue;
- unsigned LDataLatency = DataLatency;
- // Optionally add in a special extra latency for nodes that
- // feed addresses.
- // TODO: Do this for register aliases too.
- // TODO: Perhaps we should get rid of
- // SpecialAddressLatency and just move this into
- // adjustSchedDependency for the targets that care about it.
- if (SpecialAddressLatency != 0 && !UnitLatencies &&
- UseSU != &ExitSU) {
- MachineInstr *UseMI = UseSU->getInstr();
- const MCInstrDesc &UseMCID = UseMI->getDesc();
- int RegUseIndex = UseMI->findRegisterUseOperandIdx(Reg);
- assert(RegUseIndex >= 0 && "UseMI doesn's use register!");
- if (RegUseIndex >= 0 &&
- (UseMCID.mayLoad() || UseMCID.mayStore()) &&
- (unsigned)RegUseIndex < UseMCID.getNumOperands() &&
- UseMCID.OpInfo[RegUseIndex].isLookupPtrRegClass())
- LDataLatency += SpecialAddressLatency;
- }
- // Adjust the dependence latency using operand def/use
- // information (if any), and then allow the target to
- // perform its own adjustments.
- const SDep& dep = SDep(SU, SDep::Data, LDataLatency, Reg);
- if (!UnitLatencies) {
- ComputeOperandLatency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
- ST.adjustSchedDependency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
- }
- UseSU->addPred(dep);
- }
- for (const unsigned *Alias = TRI->getAliasSet(Reg); *Alias; ++Alias) {
- std::vector<SUnit *> &UseList = Uses[*Alias];
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = UseList.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- SUnit *UseSU = UseList[i];
- if (UseSU == SU)
- continue;
- const SDep& dep = SDep(SU, SDep::Data, DataLatency, *Alias);
- if (!UnitLatencies) {
- ComputeOperandLatency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
- ST.adjustSchedDependency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
- }
- UseSU->addPred(dep);
- }
- }
-
- // If a def is going to wrap back around to the top of the loop,
- // backschedule it.
- if (!UnitLatencies && DefList.empty()) {
- LoopDependencies::LoopDeps::iterator I = LoopRegs.Deps.find(Reg);
- if (I != LoopRegs.Deps.end()) {
- const MachineOperand *UseMO = I->second.first;
- unsigned Count = I->second.second;
- const MachineInstr *UseMI = UseMO->getParent();
- unsigned UseMOIdx = UseMO - &UseMI->getOperand(0);
- const MCInstrDesc &UseMCID = UseMI->getDesc();
- // TODO: If we knew the total depth of the region here, we could
- // handle the case where the whole loop is inside the region but
- // is large enough that the isScheduleHigh trick isn't needed.
- if (UseMOIdx < UseMCID.getNumOperands()) {
- // Currently, we only support scheduling regions consisting of
- // single basic blocks. Check to see if the instruction is in
- // the same region by checking to see if it has the same parent.
- if (UseMI->getParent() != MI->getParent()) {
- unsigned Latency = SU->Latency;
- if (UseMCID.OpInfo[UseMOIdx].isLookupPtrRegClass())
- Latency += SpecialAddressLatency;
- // This is a wild guess as to the portion of the latency which
- // will be overlapped by work done outside the current
- // scheduling region.
- Latency -= std::min(Latency, Count);
- // Add the artificial edge.
- ExitSU.addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, Latency,
- /*Reg=*/0, /*isNormalMemory=*/false,
- /*isMustAlias=*/false,
- /*isArtificial=*/true));
- } else if (SpecialAddressLatency > 0 &&
- UseMCID.OpInfo[UseMOIdx].isLookupPtrRegClass()) {
- // The entire loop body is within the current scheduling region
- // and the latency of this operation is assumed to be greater
- // than the latency of the loop.
- // TODO: Recursively mark data-edge predecessors as
- // isScheduleHigh too.
- SU->isScheduleHigh = true;
- }
- }
- LoopRegs.Deps.erase(I);
- }
- }
-
- UseList.clear();
- if (!MO.isDead())
- DefList.clear();
-
- // Calls will not be reordered because of chain dependencies (see
- // below). Since call operands are dead, calls may continue to be added
- // to the DefList making dependence checking quadratic in the size of
- // the block. Instead, we leave only one call at the back of the
- // DefList.
- if (SU->isCall) {
- while (!DefList.empty() && DefList.back()->isCall)
- DefList.pop_back();
- }
- DefList.push_back(SU);
- } else {
- UseList.push_back(SU);
+ if (TRI->isPhysicalRegister(Reg))
+ addPhysRegDeps(SU, j);
+ else {
+ assert(!IsPostRA && "Virtual register encountered!");
+ if (MO.isDef())
+ addVRegDefDeps(SU, j);
+ else if (MO.readsReg()) // ignore undef operands
+ addVRegUseDeps(SU, j);
}
}
// after stack slots are lowered to actual addresses.
// TODO: Use an AliasAnalysis and do real alias-analysis queries, and
// produce more precise dependence information.
-#define STORE_LOAD_LATENCY 1
- unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0;
- if (MCID.isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() ||
- (MI->hasVolatileMemoryRef() &&
- (!MCID.mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)))) {
+ unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = MI->mayStore() ? 1 : 0;
+ if (isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, MI)) {
// Be conservative with these and add dependencies on all memory
// references, even those that are known to not alias.
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I =
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
}
- NonAliasMemDefs.clear();
- NonAliasMemUses.clear();
// Add SU to the barrier chain.
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
BarrierChain = SU;
+ // This is a barrier event that acts as a pivotal node in the DAG,
+ // so it is safe to clear list of exposed nodes.
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
+ RejectMemNodes.clear();
+ NonAliasMemDefs.clear();
+ NonAliasMemUses.clear();
// fall-through
new_alias_chain:
// Chain all possibly aliasing memory references though SU.
- if (AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ if (AliasChain) {
+ unsigned ChainLatency = 0;
+ if (AliasChain->getInstr()->mayLoad())
+ ChainLatency = TrueMemOrderLatency;
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes,
+ ChainLatency);
+ }
AliasChain = SU;
for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k)
- PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I = AliasMemDefs.begin(),
- E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
- }
+ E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I)
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes);
for (std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> >::iterator I =
AliasMemUses.begin(), E = AliasMemUses.end(); I != E; ++I) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
- I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second[i], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
}
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
PendingLoads.clear();
AliasMemDefs.clear();
AliasMemUses.clear();
- } else if (MCID.mayStore()) {
+ } else if (MI->mayStore()) {
bool MayAlias = true;
- TrueMemOrderLatency = STORE_LOAD_LATENCY;
if (const Value *V = getUnderlyingObjectForInstr(MI, MFI, MayAlias)) {
// A store to a specific PseudoSourceValue. Add precise dependencies.
// Record the def in MemDefs, first adding a dep if there is
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE =
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end());
if (I != IE) {
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
- /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes,
+ 0, true);
I->second = SU;
} else {
if (MayAlias)
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemUses.end() : NonAliasMemUses.end());
if (J != JE) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = J->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
- J->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency,
- /*Reg=*/0, /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, J->second[i], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency, true);
J->second.clear();
}
if (MayAlias) {
// Add dependencies from all the PendingLoads, i.e. loads
// with no underlying object.
for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k)
- PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
// Add dependence on alias chain, if needed.
if (AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes);
+ // But we also should check dependent instructions for the
+ // SU in question.
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
}
// Add dependence on barrier chain, if needed.
+ // There is no point to check aliasing on barrier event. Even if
+ // SU and barrier _could_ be reordered, they should not. In addition,
+ // we have lost all RejectMemNodes below barrier.
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
} else {
/*Reg=*/0, /*isNormalMemory=*/false,
/*isMustAlias=*/false,
/*isArtificial=*/true));
- } else if (MCID.mayLoad()) {
+ } else if (MI->mayLoad()) {
bool MayAlias = true;
- TrueMemOrderLatency = 0;
if (MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)) {
// Invariant load, no chain dependencies needed!
} else {
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE =
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end());
if (I != IE)
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
- /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes, 0, true);
if (MayAlias)
AliasMemUses[V].push_back(SU);
else
// potentially aliasing stores.
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I =
AliasMemDefs.begin(), E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I)
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes);
PendingLoads.push_back(SU);
MayAlias = true;
}
-
+ if (MayAlias)
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes, /*Latency=*/0);
// Add dependencies on alias and barrier chains, if needed.
if (MayAlias && AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes);
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
}
if (PrevMI)
FirstDbgValue = PrevMI;
- for (int i = 0, e = TRI->getNumRegs(); i != e; ++i) {
- Defs[i].clear();
- Uses[i].clear();
- }
+ Defs.clear();
+ Uses.clear();
+ VRegDefs.clear();
PendingLoads.clear();
}
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::FinishBlock() {
- // Nothing to do.
-}
-
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::ComputeLatency(SUnit *SU) {
- // Compute the latency for the node.
- if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty()) {
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeLatency(SUnit *SU) {
+ // Compute the latency for the node. We only provide a default for missing
+ // itineraries. Empty itineraries still have latency properties.
+ if (!InstrItins) {
SU->Latency = 1;
// Simplistic target-independent heuristic: assume that loads take
// extra time.
- if (SU->getInstr()->getDesc().mayLoad())
+ if (SU->getInstr()->mayLoad())
SU->Latency += 2;
} else {
SU->Latency = TII->getInstrLatency(InstrItins, SU->getInstr());
}
}
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::ComputeOperandLatency(SUnit *Def, SUnit *Use,
- SDep& dep) const {
- if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty())
- return;
-
- // For a data dependency with a known register...
- if ((dep.getKind() != SDep::Data) || (dep.getReg() == 0))
- return;
-
- const unsigned Reg = dep.getReg();
-
- // ... find the definition of the register in the defining
- // instruction
- MachineInstr *DefMI = Def->getInstr();
- int DefIdx = DefMI->findRegisterDefOperandIdx(Reg);
- if (DefIdx != -1) {
- const MachineOperand &MO = DefMI->getOperand(DefIdx);
- if (MO.isReg() && MO.isImplicit() &&
- DefIdx >= (int)DefMI->getDesc().getNumOperands()) {
- // This is an implicit def, getOperandLatency() won't return the correct
- // latency. e.g.
- // %D6<def>, %D7<def> = VLD1q16 %R2<kill>, 0, ..., %Q3<imp-def>
- // %Q1<def> = VMULv8i16 %Q1<kill>, %Q3<kill>, ...
- // What we want is to compute latency between def of %D6/%D7 and use of
- // %Q3 instead.
- DefIdx = DefMI->findRegisterDefOperandIdx(Reg, false, true, TRI);
- }
- MachineInstr *UseMI = Use->getInstr();
- // For all uses of the register, calculate the maxmimum latency
- int Latency = -1;
- if (UseMI) {
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = UseMI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
- const MachineOperand &MO = UseMI->getOperand(i);
- if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isUse())
- continue;
- unsigned MOReg = MO.getReg();
- if (MOReg != Reg)
- continue;
-
- int UseCycle = TII->getOperandLatency(InstrItins, DefMI, DefIdx,
- UseMI, i);
- Latency = std::max(Latency, UseCycle);
- }
- } else {
- // UseMI is null, then it must be a scheduling barrier.
- if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty())
- return;
- unsigned DefClass = DefMI->getDesc().getSchedClass();
- Latency = InstrItins->getOperandCycle(DefClass, DefIdx);
- }
-
- // If we found a latency, then replace the existing dependence latency.
- if (Latency >= 0)
- dep.setLatency(Latency);
- }
-}
-
void ScheduleDAGInstrs::dumpNode(const SUnit *SU) const {
+#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
SU->getInstr()->dump();
+#endif
}
std::string ScheduleDAGInstrs::getGraphNodeLabel(const SUnit *SU) const {
return oss.str();
}
-// EmitSchedule - Emit the machine code in scheduled order.
-MachineBasicBlock *ScheduleDAGInstrs::EmitSchedule() {
- // For MachineInstr-based scheduling, we're rescheduling the instructions in
- // the block, so start by removing them from the block.
- while (Begin != InsertPos) {
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = Begin;
- ++Begin;
- BB->remove(I);
- }
-
- // If first instruction was a DBG_VALUE then put it back.
- if (FirstDbgValue)
- BB->insert(InsertPos, FirstDbgValue);
-
- // Then re-insert them according to the given schedule.
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = Sequence.size(); i != e; i++) {
- if (SUnit *SU = Sequence[i])
- BB->insert(InsertPos, SU->getInstr());
- else
- // Null SUnit* is a noop.
- EmitNoop();
- }
-
- // Update the Begin iterator, as the first instruction in the block
- // may have been scheduled later.
- if (!Sequence.empty())
- Begin = Sequence[0]->getInstr();
-
- // Reinsert any remaining debug_values.
- for (std::vector<std::pair<MachineInstr *, MachineInstr *> >::iterator
- DI = DbgValues.end(), DE = DbgValues.begin(); DI != DE; --DI) {
- std::pair<MachineInstr *, MachineInstr *> P = *prior(DI);
- MachineInstr *DbgValue = P.first;
- MachineInstr *OrigPrivMI = P.second;
- BB->insertAfter(OrigPrivMI, DbgValue);
- }
- DbgValues.clear();
- FirstDbgValue = NULL;
- return BB;
+/// Return the basic block label. It is not necessarilly unique because a block
+/// contains multiple scheduling regions. But it is fine for visualization.
+std::string ScheduleDAGInstrs::getDAGName() const {
+ return "dag." + BB->getFullName();
}
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff