Optional(T &&y) : hasVal(true) {
new (storage.buffer) T(std::forward<T>(y));
}
+ Optional(Optional<T> &&O) : hasVal(O) {
+ if (O) {
+ new (storage.buffer) T(std::move(*O));
+ O.reset();
+ }
+ }
+ Optional &operator=(T &&y) {
+ if (hasVal)
+ **this = std::move(y);
+ else {
+ new (storage.buffer) T(std::move(y));
+ hasVal = true;
+ }
+ return *this;
+ }
+ Optional &operator=(Optional &&O) {
+ if (!O)
+ reset();
+ else {
+ *this = std::move(*O);
+ O.reset();
+ }
+ return *this;
+ }
#endif
static inline Optional create(const T* y) {
return y ? Optional(*y) : Optional();
}
+ // FIXME: these assignments (& the equivalent const T&/const Optional& ctors)
+ // could be made more efficient by passing by value, possibly unifying them
+ // with the rvalue versions above - but this could place a different set of
+ // requirements (notably: the existence of a default ctor) when implemented
+ // in that way. Careful SFINAE to avoid such pitfalls would be required.
Optional &operator=(const T &y) {
if (hasVal)
**this = y;