<tr><th>Option</th><th>Name</th></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#deadarghaX0r">-deadarghaX0r</a></td><td>Dead Argument Hacking (BUGPOINT USE ONLY; DO NOT USE)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#extract-blocks">-extract-blocks</a></td><td>Extract Basic Blocks From Module (for bugpoint use)</td></tr>
-<tr><td><a href="#emitbitcode">-emitbitcode</a></td><td>Bitcode Writer</td></tr>
+<tr><td><a href="#preverify">-preverify</a></td><td>Preliminary module verification</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#verify">-verify</a></td><td>Module Verifier</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-cfg">-view-cfg</a></td><td>View CFG of function</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-cfg-only">-view-cfg-only</a></td><td>View CFG of function (with no function bodies)</td></tr>
the dependence on the exit value of the induction variable. If the only
purpose of the loop is to compute the exit value of some derived
expression, this transformation will make the loop dead.</li>
- </p>
+ </ol>
<p>
This transformation should be followed by strength reduction after all of the
<a name="internalize">Internalize Global Symbols</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass loops over all of the functions in the input module, looking for a
+ main function. If a main function is found, all other functions and all
+ global variables with initializers are marked as internal.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="ipconstprop">Interprocedural constant propagation</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass implements an <em>extremely</em> simple interprocedural constant
+ propagation pass. It could certainly be improved in many different ways,
+ like using a worklist. This pass makes arguments dead, but does not remove
+ them. The existing dead argument elimination pass should be run after this
+ to clean up the mess.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="ipsccp">Interprocedural Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ An interprocedural variant of <a href="#sccp">Sparse Conditional Constant
+ Propagation</a>.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lcssa">Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass transforms loops by placing phi nodes at the end of the loops for
+ all values that are live across the loop boundary. For example, it turns
+ the left into the right code:
+ </p>
+
+ <pre
+>for (...) for (...)
+ if (c) if (c)
+ X1 = ... X1 = ...
+ else else
+ X2 = ... X2 = ...
+ X3 = phi(X1, X2) X3 = phi(X1, X2)
+... = X3 + 4 X4 = phi(X3)
+ ... = X4 + 4</pre>
+
+ <p>
+ This is still valid LLVM; the extra phi nodes are purely redundant, and will
+ be trivially eliminated by <code>InstCombine</code>. The major benefit of
+ this transformation is that it makes many other loop optimizations, such as
+ LoopUnswitching, simpler.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="licm">Loop Invariant Code Motion</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass performs loop invariant code motion, attempting to remove as much
+ code from the body of a loop as possible. It does this by either hoisting
+ code into the preheader block, or by sinking code to the exit blocks if it is
+ safe. This pass also promotes must-aliased memory locations in the loop to
+ live in registers, thus hoisting and sinking "invariant" loads and stores.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This pass uses alias analysis for two purposes:
+ </p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>Moving loop invariant loads and calls out of loops. If we can determine
+ that a load or call inside of a loop never aliases anything stored to,
+ we can hoist it or sink it like any other instruction.</li>
+ <li>Scalar Promotion of Memory - If there is a store instruction inside of
+ the loop, we try to move the store to happen AFTER the loop instead of
+ inside of the loop. This can only happen if a few conditions are true:
+ <ul>
+ <li>The pointer stored through is loop invariant.</li>
+ <li>There are no stores or loads in the loop which <em>may</em> alias
+ the pointer. There are no calls in the loop which mod/ref the
+ pointer.</li>
+ </ul>
+ If these conditions are true, we can promote the loads and stores in the
+ loop of the pointer to use a temporary alloca'd variable. We then use
+ the mem2reg functionality to construct the appropriate SSA form for the
+ variable.</li>
+ </ul>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loop-extract">Extract loops into new functions</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ A pass wrapper around the <code>ExtractLoop()</code> scalar transformation to
+ extract each top-level loop into its own new function. If the loop is the
+ <em>only</em> loop in a given function, it is not touched. This is a pass most
+ useful for debugging via bugpoint.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loop-extract-single">Extract at most one loop into a new function</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Similar to <a href="#loop-extract">Extract loops into new functions</a>,
+ this pass extracts one natural loop from the program into a function if it
+ can. This is used by bugpoint.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loop-index-split">Index Split Loops</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass divides loop's iteration range by spliting loop such that each
+ individual loop is executed efficiently.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loop-reduce">Loop Strength Reduction</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass performs a strength reduction on array references inside loops that
+ have as one or more of their components the loop induction variable. This is
+ accomplished by creating a new value to hold the initial value of the array
+ access for the first iteration, and then creating a new GEP instruction in
+ the loop to increment the value by the appropriate amount.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loop-rotate">Rotate Loops</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>A simple loop rotation transformation.</p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loop-unroll">Unroll loops</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass implements a simple loop unroller. It works best when loops have
+ been canonicalized by the <a href="#indvars"><tt>-indvars</tt></a> pass,
+ allowing it to determine the trip counts of loops easily.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loop-unswitch">Unswitch loops</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass transforms loops that contain branches on loop-invariant conditions
+ to have multiple loops. For example, it turns the left into the right code:
+ </p>
+
+ <pre
+>for (...) if (lic)
+ A for (...)
+ if (lic) A; B; C
+ B else
+ C for (...)
+ A; C</pre>
+
+ <p>
+ This can increase the size of the code exponentially (doubling it every time
+ a loop is unswitched) so we only unswitch if the resultant code will be
+ smaller than a threshold.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This pass expects LICM to be run before it to hoist invariant conditions out
+ of the loop, to make the unswitching opportunity obvious.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="loopsimplify">Canonicalize natural loops</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass performs several transformations to transform natural loops into a
+ simpler form, which makes subsequent analyses and transformations simpler and
+ more effective.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Loop pre-header insertion guarantees that there is a single, non-critical
+ entry edge from outside of the loop to the loop header. This simplifies a
+ number of analyses and transformations, such as LICM.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Loop exit-block insertion guarantees that all exit blocks from the loop
+ (blocks which are outside of the loop that have predecessors inside of the
+ loop) only have predecessors from inside of the loop (and are thus dominated
+ by the loop header). This simplifies transformations such as store-sinking
+ that are built into LICM.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This pass also guarantees that loops will have exactly one backedge.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Note that the simplifycfg pass will clean up blocks which are split out but
+ end up being unnecessary, so usage of this pass should not pessimize
+ generated code.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This pass obviously modifies the CFG, but updates loop information and
+ dominator information.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lower-packed">lowers packed operations to operations on smaller packed datatypes</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Lowers operations on vector datatypes into operations on more primitive vector
+ datatypes, and finally to scalar operations.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lowerallocs">Lower allocations from instructions to calls</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Turn <tt>malloc</tt> and <tt>free</tt> instructions into <tt>@malloc</tt> and
+ <tt>@free</tt> calls.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This is a target-dependent tranformation because it depends on the size of
+ data types and alignment constraints.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lowergc">Lower GC intrinsics, for GCless code generators</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This file implements lowering for the <tt>llvm.gc*</tt> intrinsics for targets
+ that do not natively support them (which includes the C backend). Note that
+ the code generated is not as efficient as it would be for targets that
+ natively support the GC intrinsics, but it is useful for getting new targets
+ up-and-running quickly.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This pass implements the code transformation described in this paper:
+ </p>
+
+ <blockquote><p>
+ "Accurate Garbage Collection in an Uncooperative Environment"
+ Fergus Henderson, ISMM, 2002
+ </p></blockquote>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lowerinvoke">Lower invoke and unwind, for unwindless code generators</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This transformation is designed for use by code generators which do not yet
+ support stack unwinding. This pass supports two models of exception handling
+ lowering, the 'cheap' support and the 'expensive' support.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ 'Cheap' exception handling support gives the program the ability to execute
+ any program which does not "throw an exception", by turning 'invoke'
+ instructions into calls and by turning 'unwind' instructions into calls to
+ abort(). If the program does dynamically use the unwind instruction, the
+ program will print a message then abort.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ 'Expensive' exception handling support gives the full exception handling
+ support to the program at the cost of making the 'invoke' instruction
+ really expensive. It basically inserts setjmp/longjmp calls to emulate the
+ exception handling as necessary.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Because the 'expensive' support slows down programs a lot, and EH is only
+ used for a subset of the programs, it must be specifically enabled by the
+ <tt>-enable-correct-eh-support</tt> option.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Note that after this pass runs the CFG is not entirely accurate (exceptional
+ control flow edges are not correct anymore) so only very simple things should
+ be done after the lowerinvoke pass has run (like generation of native code).
+ This should not be used as a general purpose "my LLVM-to-LLVM pass doesn't
+ support the invoke instruction yet" lowering pass.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lowerselect">Lower select instructions to branches</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Lowers select instructions into conditional branches for targets that do not
+ have conditional moves or that have not implemented the select instruction
+ yet.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Note that this pass could be improved. In particular it turns every select
+ instruction into a new conditional branch, even though some common cases have
+ select instructions on the same predicate next to each other. It would be
+ better to use the same branch for the whole group of selects.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lowersetjmp">Lower Set Jump</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Lowers <tt>setjmp</tt> and <tt>longjmp</tt> to use the LLVM invoke and unwind
+ instructions as necessary.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Lowering of <tt>longjmp</tt> is fairly trivial. We replace the call with a
+ call to the LLVM library function <tt>__llvm_sjljeh_throw_longjmp()</tt>.
+ This unwinds the stack for us calling all of the destructors for
+ objects allocated on the stack.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ At a <tt>setjmp</tt> call, the basic block is split and the <tt>setjmp</tt>
+ removed. The calls in a function that have a <tt>setjmp</tt> are converted to
+ invoke where the except part checks to see if it's a <tt>longjmp</tt>
+ exception and, if so, if it's handled in the function. If it is, then it gets
+ the value returned by the <tt>longjmp</tt> and goes to where the basic block
+ was split. <tt>invoke</tt> instructions are handled in a similar fashion with
+ the original except block being executed if it isn't a <tt>longjmp</tt>
+ except that is handled by that function.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="lowerswitch">Lower SwitchInst's to branches</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Rewrites <tt>switch</tt> instructions with a sequence of branches, which
+ allows targets to get away with not implementing the switch instruction until
+ it is convenient.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="mem2reg">Promote Memory to Register</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This file promotes memory references to be register references. It promotes
+ <tt>alloca</tt> instructions which only have <tt>load</tt>s and
+ <tt>store</tt>s as uses. An <tt>alloca</tt> is transformed by using dominator
+ frontiers to place <tt>phi</tt> nodes, then traversing the function in
+ depth-first order to rewrite <tt>load</tt>s and <tt>store</tt>s as
+ appropriate. This is just the standard SSA construction algorithm to construct
+ "pruned" SSA form.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="mergereturn">Unify function exit nodes</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Ensure that functions have at most one <tt>ret</tt> instruction in them.
+ Additionally, it keeps track of which node is the new exit node of the CFG.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="predsimplify">Predicate Simplifier</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Path-sensitive optimizer. In a branch where <tt>x == y</tt>, replace uses of
+ <tt>x</tt> with <tt>y</tt>. Permits further optimization, such as the
+ elimination of the unreachable call:
+ </p>
+
+<blockquote><pre
+>void test(int *p, int *q)
+{
+ if (p != q)
+ return;
+
+ if (*p != *q)
+ foo(); // unreachable
+}</pre></blockquote>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="prune-eh">Remove unused exception handling info</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This file implements a simple interprocedural pass which walks the call-graph,
+ turning <tt>invoke</tt> instructions into <tt>call</tt> instructions if and
+ only if the callee cannot throw an exception. It implements this as a
+ bottom-up traversal of the call-graph.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="raiseallocs">Raise allocations from calls to instructions</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Converts <tt>@malloc</tt> and <tt>@free</tt> calls to <tt>malloc</tt> and
+ <tt>free</tt> instructions.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="reassociate">Reassociate expressions</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass reassociates commutative expressions in an order that is designed
+ to promote better constant propagation, GCSE, LICM, PRE, etc.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ For example: 4 + (<var>x</var> + 5) ⇒ <var>x</var> + (4 + 5)
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ In the implementation of this algorithm, constants are assigned rank = 0,
+ function arguments are rank = 1, and other values are assigned ranks
+ corresponding to the reverse post order traversal of current function
+ (starting at 2), which effectively gives values in deep loops higher rank
+ than values not in loops.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="reg2mem">Demote all values to stack slots</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This file demotes all registers to memory references. It is intented to be
+ the inverse of <a href="#mem2reg"><tt>-mem2reg</tt></a>. By converting to
+ <tt>load</tt> instructions, the only values live accross basic blocks are
+ <tt>alloca</tt> instructions and <tt>load</tt> instructions before
+ <tt>phi</tt> nodes. It is intended that this should make CFG hacking much
+ easier. To make later hacking easier, the entry block is split into two, such
+ that all introduced <tt>alloca</tt> instructions (and nothing else) are in the
+ entry block.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="scalarrepl">Scalar Replacement of Aggregates</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ The well-known scalar replacement of aggregates transformation. This
+ transform breaks up <tt>alloca</tt> instructions of aggregate type (structure
+ or array) into individual <tt>alloca</tt> instructions for each member if
+ possible. Then, if possible, it transforms the individual <tt>alloca</tt>
+ instructions into nice clean scalar SSA form.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This combines a simple scalar replacement of aggregates algorithm with the <a
+ href="#mem2reg"><tt>mem2reg</tt></a> algorithm because often interact,
+ especially for C++ programs. As such, iterating between <tt>scalarrepl</tt>,
+ then <a href="#mem2reg"><tt>mem2reg</tt></a> until we run out of things to
+ promote works well.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="sccp">Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Sparse conditional constant propagation and merging, which can be summarized
+ as:
+ </p>
+
+ <ol>
+ <li>Assumes values are constant unless proven otherwise</li>
+ <li>Assumes BasicBlocks are dead unless proven otherwise</li>
+ <li>Proves values to be constant, and replaces them with constants</li>
+ <li>Proves conditional branches to be unconditional</li>
+ </ol>
+
+ <p>
+ Note that this pass has a habit of making definitions be dead. It is a good
+ idea to to run a DCE pass sometime after running this pass.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="simplify-libcalls">Simplify well-known library calls</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Applies a variety of small optimizations for calls to specific well-known
+ function calls (e.g. runtime library functions). For example, a call
+ <tt>exit(3)</tt> that occurs within the <tt>main()</tt> function can be
+ transformed into simply <tt>return 3</tt>.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="simplifycfg">Simplify the CFG</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Performs dead code elimination and basic block merging. Specifically:
+ </p>
+
+ <ol>
+ <li>Removes basic blocks with no predecessors.</li>
+ <li>Merges a basic block into its predecessor if there is only one and the
+ predecessor only has one successor.</li>
+ <li>Eliminates PHI nodes for basic blocks with a single predecessor.</li>
+ <li>Eliminates a basic block that only contains an unconditional
+ branch.</li>
+ </ol>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="strip">Strip all symbols from a module</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Performs code stripping. This transformation can delete:
+ </p>
+
+ <ol>
+ <li>names for virtual registers</li>
+ <li>symbols for internal globals and functions</li>
+ <li>debug information</li>
+ </ol>
+
+ <p>
+ Note that this transformation makes code much less readable, so it should
+ only be used in situations where the <tt>strip</tt> utility would be used,
+ such as reducing code size or making it harder to reverse engineer code.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="tailcallelim">Tail Call Elimination</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This file transforms calls of the current function (self recursion) followed
+ by a return instruction with a branch to the entry of the function, creating
+ a loop. This pass also implements the following extensions to the basic
+ algorithm:
+ </p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>Trivial instructions between the call and return do not prevent the
+ transformation from taking place, though currently the analysis cannot
+ support moving any really useful instructions (only dead ones).
+ <li>This pass transforms functions that are prevented from being tail
+ recursive by an associative expression to use an accumulator variable,
+ thus compiling the typical naive factorial or <tt>fib</tt> implementation
+ into efficient code.
+ <li>TRE is performed if the function returns void, if the return
+ returns the result returned by the call, or if the function returns a
+ run-time constant on all exits from the function. It is possible, though
+ unlikely, that the return returns something else (like constant 0), and
+ can still be TRE'd. It can be TRE'd if <em>all other</em> return
+ instructions in the function return the exact same value.
+ <li>If it can prove that callees do not access theier caller stack frame,
+ they are marked as eligible for tail call elimination (by the code
+ generator).
+ </ul>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="tailduplicate">Tail Duplication</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass performs a limited form of tail duplication, intended to simplify
+ CFGs by removing some unconditional branches. This pass is necessary to
+ straighten out loops created by the C front-end, but also is capable of
+ making other code nicer. After this pass is run, the CFG simplify pass
+ should be run to clean up the mess.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<a name="deadarghaX0r">Dead Argument Hacking (BUGPOINT USE ONLY; DO NOT USE)</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Same as dead argument elimination, but deletes arguments to functions which
+ are external. This is only for use by <a
+ href="Bugpoint.html">bugpoint</a>.</p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="extract-blocks">Extract Basic Blocks From Module (for bugpoint use)</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ This pass is used by bugpoint to extract all blocks from the module into their
+ own functions.</p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="emitbitcode">Bitcode Writer</a>
+ <a name="preverify">Preliminary module verification</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Ensures that the module is in the form required by the <a
+ href="#verifier">Module Verifier</a> pass.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Running the verifier runs this pass automatically, so there should be no need
+ to use it directly.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="verify">Module Verifier</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Verifies an LLVM IR code. This is useful to run after an optimization which is
+ undergoing testing. Note that <tt>llvm-as</tt> verifies its input before
+ emitting bitcode, and also that malformed bitcode is likely to make LLVM
+ crash. All language front-ends are therefore encouraged to verify their output
+ before performing optimizing transformations.
+ </p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>Both of a binary operator's parameters are of the same type.</li>
+ <li>Verify that the indices of mem access instructions match other
+ operands.</li>
+ <li>Verify that arithmetic and other things are only performed on
+ first-class types. Verify that shifts and logicals only happen on
+ integrals f.e.</li>
+ <li>All of the constants in a switch statement are of the correct type.</li>
+ <li>The code is in valid SSA form.</li>
+ <li>It should be illegal to put a label into any other type (like a
+ structure) or to return one. [except constant arrays!]</li>
+ <li>Only phi nodes can be self referential: <tt>%x = add int %x, %x</tt> is
+ invalid.</li>
+ <li>PHI nodes must have an entry for each predecessor, with no extras.</li>
+ <li>PHI nodes must be the first thing in a basic block, all grouped
+ together.</li>
+ <li>PHI nodes must have at least one entry.</li>
+ <li>All basic blocks should only end with terminator insts, not contain
+ them.</li>
+ <li>The entry node to a function must not have predecessors.</li>
+ <li>All Instructions must be embedded into a basic block.</li>
+ <li>Functions cannot take a void-typed parameter.</li>
+ <li>Verify that a function's argument list agrees with its declared
+ type.</li>
+ <li>It is illegal to specify a name for a void value.</li>
+ <li>It is illegal to have a internal global value with no initializer.</li>
+ <li>It is illegal to have a ret instruction that returns a value that does
+ not agree with the function return value type.</li>
+ <li>Function call argument types match the function prototype.</li>
+ <li>All other things that are tested by asserts spread about the code.</li>
+ </ul>
+
+ <p>
+ Note that this does not provide full security verification (like Java), but
+ instead just tries to ensure that code is well-formed.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="view-cfg">View CFG of function</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Displays the control flow graph using the GraphViz tool.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<a name="view-cfg-only">View CFG of function (with no function bodies)</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
- <p>Yet to be written.</p>
+ <p>
+ Displays the control flow graph using the GraphViz tool, but omitting function
+ bodies.
+ </p>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff