<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>The LLVM Target-Independent Code Generator</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
+
+ <style type="text/css">
+ .unknown { background-color: #C0C0C0; text-align: center; }
+ .unknown:before { content: "?" }
+ .no { background-color: #C11B17 }
+ .no:before { content: "N" }
+ .partial { background-color: #F88017 }
+ .yes { background-color: #0F0; }
+ .yes:before { content: "Y" }
+ </style>
+
</head>
<body>
-<div class="doc_title">
+<h1>
The LLVM Target-Independent Code Generator
-</div>
+</h1>
<ol>
<li><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a>
<li><a href="#targetjitinfo">The <tt>TargetJITInfo</tt> class</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
- <li><a href="#codegendesc">Machine code description classes</a>
+ <li><a href="#codegendesc">The "Machine" Code Generator classes</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#machineinstr">The <tt>MachineInstr</tt> class</a></li>
<li><a href="#machinebasicblock">The <tt>MachineBasicBlock</tt>
class</a></li>
<li><a href="#machinefunction">The <tt>MachineFunction</tt> class</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#machineinstrbundle"><tt>MachineInstr Bundles</tt></a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ <li><a href="#mc">The "MC" Layer</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li><a href="#mcstreamer">The <tt>MCStreamer</tt> API</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#mccontext">The <tt>MCContext</tt> class</a>
+ <li><a href="#mcsymbol">The <tt>MCSymbol</tt> class</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#mcsection">The <tt>MCSection</tt> class</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#mcinst">The <tt>MCInst</tt> class</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="#codegenalgs">Target-independent code generation algorithms</a>
<li><a href="#regAlloc_fold">Instruction folding</a></li>
<li><a href="#regAlloc_builtIn">Built in register allocators</a></li>
</ul></li>
- <li><a href="#codeemit">Code Emission</a>
- <ul>
- <li><a href="#codeemit_asm">Generating Assembly Code</a></li>
- <li><a href="#codeemit_bin">Generating Binary Machine Code</a></li>
- </ul></li>
+ <li><a href="#codeemit">Code Emission</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#vliw_packetizer">VLIW Packetizer</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li><a href="#vliw_mapping">Mapping from instructions to functional
+ units</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#vliw_repr">How the packetization tables are
+ generated and used</a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
</ul>
</li>
+ <li><a href="#nativeassembler">Implementing a Native Assembler</a></li>
+
<li><a href="#targetimpls">Target-specific Implementation Notes</a>
<ul>
+ <li><a href="#targetfeatures">Target Feature Matrix</a></li>
<li><a href="#tailcallopt">Tail call optimization</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#sibcallopt">Sibling call optimization</a></li>
<li><a href="#x86">The X86 backend</a></li>
<li><a href="#ppc">The PowerPC backend</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#ppc_prolog">Prolog/Epilog</a></li>
<li><a href="#ppc_dynamic">Dynamic Allocation</a></li>
</ul></li>
+ <li><a href="#ptx">The PTX backend</a></li>
</ul></li>
</ol>
<div class="doc_author">
- <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a>,
- <a href="mailto:isanbard@gmail.com">Bill Wendling</a>,
- <a href="mailto:pronesto@gmail.com">Fernando Magno Quintao
- Pereira</a> and
- <a href="mailto:jlaskey@mac.com">Jim Laskey</a></p>
+ <p>Written by the LLVM Team.</p>
</div>
<div class="doc_warning">
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
+<h2>
<a name="introduction">Introduction</a>
-</div>
+</h2>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The LLVM target-independent code generator is a framework that provides a
suite of reusable components for translating the LLVM internal representation
to the machine code for a specified target—either in assembly form
(suitable for a static compiler) or in binary machine code format (usable for
- a JIT compiler). The LLVM target-independent code generator consists of five
+ a JIT compiler). The LLVM target-independent code generator consists of six
main components:</p>
<ol>
independently of how they will be used. These interfaces are defined in
<tt>include/llvm/Target/</tt>.</li>
- <li>Classes used to represent the <a href="#codegendesc">machine code</a>
- being generated for a target. These classes are intended to be abstract
+ <li>Classes used to represent the <a href="#codegendesc">code being
+ generated</a> for a target. These classes are intended to be abstract
enough to represent the machine code for <i>any</i> target machine. These
- classes are defined in <tt>include/llvm/CodeGen/</tt>.</li>
+ classes are defined in <tt>include/llvm/CodeGen/</tt>. At this level,
+ concepts like "constant pool entries" and "jump tables" are explicitly
+ exposed.</li>
+
+ <li>Classes and algorithms used to represent code as the object file level,
+ the <a href="#mc">MC Layer</a>. These classes represent assembly level
+ constructs like labels, sections, and instructions. At this level,
+ concepts like "constant pool entries" and "jump tables" don't exist.</li>
<li><a href="#codegenalgs">Target-independent algorithms</a> used to implement
various phases of native code generation (register allocation, scheduling,
depend on the target-description and machine code representation classes,
ensuring that it is portable.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="required">Required components in the code generator</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The two pieces of the LLVM code generator are the high-level interface to the
code generator and the set of reusable components that can be used to build
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="high-level-design">The high-level design of the code generator</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The LLVM target-independent code generator is designed to support efficient
and quality code generation for standard register-based microprocessors.
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="tablegen">Using TableGen for target description</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The target description classes require a detailed description of the target
architecture. These target descriptions often have a large amount of common
</div>
+</div>
+
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
+<h2>
<a name="targetdesc">Target description classes</a>
-</div>
+</h2>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The LLVM target description classes (located in the
<tt>include/llvm/Target</tt> directory) provide an abstract description of
<tt><a href="#targetmachine">TargetMachine</a></tt> class provides accessors
that should be implemented by the target.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetmachine">The <tt>TargetMachine</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetMachine</tt> class provides virtual methods that are used to
access the target-specific implementations of the various target description
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetdata">The <tt>TargetData</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetData</tt> class is the only required target description class,
and it is the only class that is not extensible (you cannot derived a new
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetlowering">The <tt>TargetLowering</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetLowering</tt> class is used by SelectionDAG based instruction
selectors primarily to describe how LLVM code should be lowered to
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetregisterinfo">The <tt>TargetRegisterInfo</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetRegisterInfo</tt> class is used to describe the register file
of the target and any interactions between the registers.</p>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetinstrinfo">The <tt>TargetInstrInfo</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetInstrInfo</tt> class is used to describe the machine
instructions supported by the target. It is essentially an array of
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetframeinfo">The <tt>TargetFrameInfo</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetFrameInfo</tt> class is used to provide information about the
stack frame layout of the target. It holds the direction of stack growth, the
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetsubtarget">The <tt>TargetSubtarget</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetSubtarget</tt> class is used to provide information about the
specific chip set being targeted. A sub-target informs code generation of
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="targetjitinfo">The <tt>TargetJITInfo</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>TargetJITInfo</tt> class exposes an abstract interface used by the
Just-In-Time code generator to perform target-specific activities, such as
</div>
+</div>
+
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
+<h2>
<a name="codegendesc">Machine code description classes</a>
-</div>
+</h2>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>At the high-level, LLVM code is translated to a machine specific
representation formed out of
SSA representation for machine code, as well as a register allocated, non-SSA
form.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="machineinstr">The <tt>MachineInstr</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>Target machine instructions are represented as instances of the
<tt>MachineInstr</tt> class. This class is an extremely abstract way of
<p>Also if the first operand is a def, it is easier to <a href="#buildmi">create
instructions</a> whose only def is the first operand.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="buildmi">Using the <tt>MachineInstrBuilder.h</tt> functions</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>Machine instructions are created by using the <tt>BuildMI</tt> functions,
located in the <tt>include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h</tt> file. The
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="fixedregs">Fixed (preassigned) registers</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>One important issue that the code generator needs to be aware of is the
presence of fixed registers. In particular, there are often places in the
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ssa">Machine code in SSA form</a>
+<h4>
+ <a name="callclobber">Call-clobbered registers</a>
+</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>Some machine instructions, like calls, clobber a large number of physical
+ registers. Rather than adding <code><def,dead></code> operands for
+ all of them, it is possible to use an <code>MO_RegisterMask</code> operand
+ instead. The register mask operand holds a bit mask of preserved registers,
+ and everything else is considered to be clobbered by the instruction. </p>
+
</div>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4>
+ <a name="ssa">Machine code in SSA form</a>
+</h4>
+
+<div>
<p><tt>MachineInstr</tt>'s are initially selected in SSA-form, and are
maintained in SSA-form until register allocation happens. For the most part,
</div>
+</div>
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="machinebasicblock">The <tt>MachineBasicBlock</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>MachineBasicBlock</tt> class contains a list of machine instructions
(<tt><a href="#machineinstr">MachineInstr</a></tt> instances). It roughly
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="machinefunction">The <tt>MachineFunction</tt> class</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <tt>MachineFunction</tt> class contains a list of machine basic blocks
(<tt><a href="#machinebasicblock">MachineBasicBlock</a></tt> instances). It
</div>
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="machineinstrbundle"><tt>MachineInstr Bundles</tt></a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>LLVM code generator can model sequences of instructions as MachineInstr
+ bundles. A MI bundle can model a VLIW group / pack which contains an
+ arbitrary number of parallel instructions. It can also be used to model
+ a sequential list of instructions (potentially with data dependencies) that
+ cannot be legally separated (e.g. ARM Thumb2 IT blocks).</p>
+
+<p>Conceptually a MI bundle is a MI with a number of other MIs nested within:
+</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+--------------
+| Bundle | ---------
+-------------- \
+ | ----------------
+ | | MI |
+ | ----------------
+ | |
+ | ----------------
+ | | MI |
+ | ----------------
+ | |
+ | ----------------
+ | | MI |
+ | ----------------
+ |
+--------------
+| Bundle | --------
+-------------- \
+ | ----------------
+ | | MI |
+ | ----------------
+ | |
+ | ----------------
+ | | MI |
+ | ----------------
+ | |
+ | ...
+ |
+--------------
+| Bundle | --------
+-------------- \
+ |
+ ...
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p> MI bundle support does not change the physical representations of
+ MachineBasicBlock and MachineInstr. All the MIs (including top level and
+ nested ones) are stored as sequential list of MIs. The "bundled" MIs are
+ marked with the 'InsideBundle' flag. A top level MI with the special BUNDLE
+ opcode is used to represent the start of a bundle. It's legal to mix BUNDLE
+ MIs with indiviual MIs that are not inside bundles nor represent bundles.
+</p>
+
+<p> MachineInstr passes should operate on a MI bundle as a single unit. Member
+ methods have been taught to correctly handle bundles and MIs inside bundles.
+ The MachineBasicBlock iterator has been modified to skip over bundled MIs to
+ enforce the bundle-as-a-single-unit concept. An alternative iterator
+ instr_iterator has been added to MachineBasicBlock to allow passes to
+ iterate over all of the MIs in a MachineBasicBlock, including those which
+ are nested inside bundles. The top level BUNDLE instruction must have the
+ correct set of register MachineOperand's that represent the cumulative
+ inputs and outputs of the bundled MIs.</p>
+
+<p> Packing / bundling of MachineInstr's should be done as part of the register
+ allocation super-pass. More specifically, the pass which determines what
+ MIs should be bundled together must be done after code generator exits SSA
+ form (i.e. after two-address pass, PHI elimination, and copy coalescing).
+ Bundles should only be finalized (i.e. adding BUNDLE MIs and input and
+ output register MachineOperands) after virtual registers have been
+ rewritten into physical registers. This requirement eliminates the need to
+ add virtual register operands to BUNDLE instructions which would effectively
+ double the virtual register def and use lists.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
- <a name="codegenalgs">Target-independent code generation algorithms</a>
+<h2>
+ <a name="mc">The "MC" Layer</a>
+</h2>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div>
+
+<p>
+The MC Layer is used to represent and process code at the raw machine code
+level, devoid of "high level" information like "constant pools", "jump tables",
+"global variables" or anything like that. At this level, LLVM handles things
+like label names, machine instructions, and sections in the object file. The
+code in this layer is used for a number of important purposes: the tail end of
+the code generator uses it to write a .s or .o file, and it is also used by the
+llvm-mc tool to implement standalone machine code assemblers and disassemblers.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This section describes some of the important classes. There are also a number
+of important subsystems that interact at this layer, they are described later
+in this manual.
+</p>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="mcstreamer">The <tt>MCStreamer</tt> API</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>
+MCStreamer is best thought of as an assembler API. It is an abstract API which
+is <em>implemented</em> in different ways (e.g. to output a .s file, output an
+ELF .o file, etc) but whose API correspond directly to what you see in a .s
+file. MCStreamer has one method per directive, such as EmitLabel,
+EmitSymbolAttribute, SwitchSection, EmitValue (for .byte, .word), etc, which
+directly correspond to assembly level directives. It also has an
+EmitInstruction method, which is used to output an MCInst to the streamer.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This API is most important for two clients: the llvm-mc stand-alone assembler is
+effectively a parser that parses a line, then invokes a method on MCStreamer. In
+the code generator, the <a href="#codeemit">Code Emission</a> phase of the code
+generator lowers higher level LLVM IR and Machine* constructs down to the MC
+layer, emitting directives through MCStreamer.</p>
+
+<p>
+On the implementation side of MCStreamer, there are two major implementations:
+one for writing out a .s file (MCAsmStreamer), and one for writing out a .o
+file (MCObjectStreamer). MCAsmStreamer is a straight-forward implementation
+that prints out a directive for each method (e.g. EmitValue -> .byte), but
+MCObjectStreamer implements a full assembler.
+</p>
+
</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="mccontext">The <tt>MCContext</tt> class</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>
+The MCContext class is the owner of a variety of uniqued data structures at the
+MC layer, including symbols, sections, etc. As such, this is the class that you
+interact with to create symbols and sections. This class can not be subclassed.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="mcsymbol">The <tt>MCSymbol</tt> class</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>
+The MCSymbol class represents a symbol (aka label) in the assembly file. There
+are two interesting kinds of symbols: assembler temporary symbols, and normal
+symbols. Assembler temporary symbols are used and processed by the assembler
+but are discarded when the object file is produced. The distinction is usually
+represented by adding a prefix to the label, for example "L" labels are
+assembler temporary labels in MachO.
+</p>
+
+<p>MCSymbols are created by MCContext and uniqued there. This means that
+MCSymbols can be compared for pointer equivalence to find out if they are the
+same symbol. Note that pointer inequality does not guarantee the labels will
+end up at different addresses though. It's perfectly legal to output something
+like this to the .s file:<p>
+
+<pre>
+ foo:
+ bar:
+ .byte 4
+</pre>
+
+<p>In this case, both the foo and bar symbols will have the same address.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="mcsection">The <tt>MCSection</tt> class</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>
+The MCSection class represents an object-file specific section. It is subclassed
+by object file specific implementations (e.g. <tt>MCSectionMachO</tt>,
+<tt>MCSectionCOFF</tt>, <tt>MCSectionELF</tt>) and these are created and uniqued
+by MCContext. The MCStreamer has a notion of the current section, which can be
+changed with the SwitchToSection method (which corresponds to a ".section"
+directive in a .s file).
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="mcinst">The <tt>MCInst</tt> class</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>
+The MCInst class is a target-independent representation of an instruction. It
+is a simple class (much more so than <a href="#machineinstr">MachineInstr</a>)
+that holds a target-specific opcode and a vector of MCOperands. MCOperand, in
+turn, is a simple discriminated union of three cases: 1) a simple immediate,
+2) a target register ID, 3) a symbolic expression (e.g. "Lfoo-Lbar+42") as an
+MCExpr.
+</p>
+
+<p>MCInst is the common currency used to represent machine instructions at the
+MC layer. It is the type used by the instruction encoder, the instruction
+printer, and the type generated by the assembly parser and disassembler.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<h2>
+ <a name="codegenalgs">Target-independent code generation algorithms</a>
+</h2>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>This section documents the phases described in the
<a href="#high-level-design">high-level design of the code generator</a>.
It explains how they work and some of the rationale behind their design.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="instselect">Instruction Selection</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>Instruction Selection is the process of translating LLVM code presented to
the code generator into target-specific machine instructions. There are
selector to be generated from these <tt>.td</tt> files, though currently
there are still things that require custom C++ code.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_intro">Introduction to SelectionDAGs</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The SelectionDAG provides an abstraction for code representation in a way
that is amenable to instruction selection using automatic techniques
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_process">SelectionDAG Instruction Selection Process</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>SelectionDAG-based instruction selection consists of the following steps:</p>
SelectionDAG optimizer is run to clean up redundancies exposed by type
legalization.</li>
- <li><a href="#selectiondag_legalize">Legalize SelectionDAG Types</a> —
- This stage transforms SelectionDAG nodes to eliminate any types that are
- unsupported on the target.</li>
+ <li><a href="#selectiondag_legalize">Legalize SelectionDAG Ops</a> —
+ This stage transforms SelectionDAG nodes to eliminate any operations
+ that are unsupported on the target.</li>
<li><a href="#selectiondag_optimize">Optimize SelectionDAG</a> — The
SelectionDAG optimizer is run to eliminate inefficiencies introduced by
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_build">Initial SelectionDAG Construction</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The initial SelectionDAG is naïvely peephole expanded from the LLVM
input by the <tt>SelectionDAGLowering</tt> class in the
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_legalize_types">SelectionDAG LegalizeTypes Phase</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The Legalize phase is in charge of converting a DAG to only use the types
that are natively supported by the target.</p>
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_legalize">SelectionDAG Legalize Phase</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The Legalize phase is in charge of converting a DAG to only use the
operations that are natively supported by the target.</p>
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="selectiondag_optimize">SelectionDAG Optimization Phase: the DAG
- Combiner</a>
-</div>
+<h4>
+ <a name="selectiondag_optimize">
+ SelectionDAG Optimization Phase: the DAG Combiner
+ </a>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The SelectionDAG optimization phase is run multiple times for code
generation, immediately after the DAG is built and once after each
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_select">SelectionDAG Select Phase</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The Select phase is the bulk of the target-specific code for instruction
selection. This phase takes a legal SelectionDAG as input, pattern matches
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-%t1 = add float %W, %X
-%t2 = mul float %t1, %Y
-%t3 = add float %t2, %Z
+%t1 = fadd float %W, %X
+%t2 = fmul float %t1, %Y
+%t3 = fadd float %t2, %Z
</pre>
</div>
<p>The portion of the instruction definition in bold indicates the pattern used
to match the instruction. The DAG operators
(like <tt>fmul</tt>/<tt>fadd</tt>) are defined in
- the <tt>lib/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td</tt> file. "<tt>F4RC</tt>" is the
- register class of the input and result values.</p>
+ the <tt>include/llvm/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td</tt> file. "
+ <tt>F4RC</tt>" is the register class of the input and result values.</p>
<p>The TableGen DAG instruction selector generator reads the instruction
patterns in the <tt>.td</tt> file and automatically builds parts of the
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_sched">SelectionDAG Scheduling and Formation Phase</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The scheduling phase takes the DAG of target instructions from the selection
phase and assigns an order. The scheduler can pick an order depending on
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="selectiondag_future">Future directions for the SelectionDAG</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<ol>
<li>Optional function-at-a-time selection.</li>
</div>
+</div>
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="ssamco">SSA-based Machine Code Optimizations</a>
-</div>
-<div
class="doc_text"><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+</h3>
+<div><p>To Be Written</p></div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="liveintervals">Live Intervals</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>Live Intervals are the ranges (intervals) where a variable is <i>live</i>.
They are used by some <a href="#regalloc">register allocator</a> passes to
register are live at the same point in the program (i.e., they conflict).
When this situation occurs, one virtual register must be <i>spilled</i>.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="livevariable_analysis">Live Variable Analysis</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The first step in determining the live intervals of variables is to calculate
the set of registers that are immediately dead after the instruction (i.e.,
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="liveintervals_analysis">Live Intervals Analysis</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>We now have the information available to perform the live intervals analysis
and build the live intervals themselves. We start off by numbering the basic
</div>
+</div>
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="regalloc">Register Allocation</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The <i>Register Allocation problem</i> consists in mapping a program
<i>P<sub>v</sub></i>, that can use an unbounded number of virtual registers,
accommodate all the virtual registers, some of them will have to be mapped
into memory. These virtuals are called <i>spilled virtuals</i>.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="regAlloc_represent">How registers are represented in LLVM</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>In LLVM, physical registers are denoted by integer numbers that normally
range from 1 to 1023. To see how this numbering is defined for a particular
architecture, you can read the <tt>GenRegisterNames.inc</tt> file for that
architecture. For instance, by
- inspecting <tt>lib/Target/X86/X86GenRegisterNames.inc</tt> we see that the
- 32-bit register <tt>EAX</tt> is denoted by 15, and the MMX register
- <tt>MM0</tt> is mapped to 48.</p>
+ inspecting <tt>lib/Target/X86/X86GenRegisterInfo.inc</tt> we see that the
+ 32-bit register <tt>EAX</tt> is denoted by 43, and the MMX register
+ <tt>MM0</tt> is mapped to 65.</p>
<p>Some architectures contain registers that share the same physical location. A
notable example is the X86 platform. For instance, in the X86 architecture,
bits. These physical registers are marked as <i>aliased</i> in LLVM. Given a
particular architecture, you can check which registers are aliased by
inspecting its <tt>RegisterInfo.td</tt> file. Moreover, the method
- <tt>TargetRegisterInfo::getAliasSet(p_reg)</tt> returns an array containing
+ <tt>MCRegisterInfo::getAliasSet(p_reg)</tt> returns an array containing
all the physical registers aliased to the register <tt>p_reg</tt>.</p>
<p>Physical registers, in LLVM, are grouped in <i>Register Classes</i>.
</p>
<p>Virtual registers are also denoted by integer numbers. Contrary to physical
- registers, different virtual registers never share the same number. The
- smallest virtual register is normally assigned the number 1024. This may
- change, so, in order to know which is the first virtual register, you should
- access <tt>TargetRegisterInfo::FirstVirtualRegister</tt>. Any register whose
- number is greater than or equal
- to <tt>TargetRegisterInfo::FirstVirtualRegister</tt> is considered a virtual
- register. Whereas physical registers are statically defined in
- a <tt>TargetRegisterInfo.td</tt> file and cannot be created by the
- application developer, that is not the case with virtual registers. In order
- to create new virtual registers, use the
+ registers, different virtual registers never share the same number. Whereas
+ physical registers are statically defined in a <tt>TargetRegisterInfo.td</tt>
+ file and cannot be created by the application developer, that is not the case
+ with virtual registers. In order to create new virtual registers, use the
method <tt>MachineRegisterInfo::createVirtualRegister()</tt>. This method
- will return a virtual register with the highest code.</p>
+ will return a new virtual register. Use an <tt>IndexedMap<Foo,
+ VirtReg2IndexFunctor></tt> to hold information per virtual register. If you
+ need to enumerate all virtual registers, use the function
+ <tt>TargetRegisterInfo::index2VirtReg()</tt> to find the virtual register
+ numbers:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = MRI->getNumVirtRegs(); i != e; ++i) {
+ unsigned VirtReg = TargetRegisterInfo::index2VirtReg(i);
+ stuff(VirtReg);
+ }
+</pre>
+</div>
<p>Before register allocation, the operands of an instruction are mostly virtual
registers, although physical registers may also be used. In order to check if
instruction,
use <tt>TargetInstrInfo::get(opcode)::ImplicitUses</tt>. Pre-colored
registers impose constraints on any register allocation algorithm. The
- register allocator must make sure that none of them is been overwritten by
+ register allocator must make sure that none of them are overwritten by
the values of virtual registers while still alive.</p>
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="regAlloc_howTo">Mapping virtual registers to physical registers</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>There are two ways to map virtual registers to physical registers (or to
memory slots). The first way, that we will call <i>direct mapping</i>, is
order to get and store values in memory. To assign a physical register to a
virtual register present in a given operand,
use <tt>MachineOperand::setReg(p_reg)</tt>. To insert a store instruction,
- use <tt>TargetRegisterInfo::storeRegToStackSlot(...)</tt>, and to insert a
- load instruction, use <tt>TargetRegisterInfo::loadRegFromStackSlot</tt>.</p>
+ use <tt>TargetInstrInfo::storeRegToStackSlot(...)</tt>, and to insert a
+ load instruction, use <tt>TargetInstrInfo::loadRegFromStackSlot</tt>.</p>
<p>The indirect mapping shields the application developer from the complexities
of inserting load and store instructions. In order to map a virtual register
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="regAlloc_twoAddr">Handling two address instructions</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>With very rare exceptions (e.g., function calls), the LLVM machine code
instructions are three address instructions. That is, each instruction is
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="regAlloc_ssaDecon">The SSA deconstruction phase</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>An important transformation that happens during register allocation is called
the <i>SSA Deconstruction Phase</i>. The SSA form simplifies many analyses
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="regAlloc_fold">Instruction folding</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p><i>Instruction folding</i> is an optimization performed during register
allocation that removes unnecessary copy instructions. For instance, a
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="regAlloc_builtIn">Built in register allocators</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The LLVM infrastructure provides the application developer with three
different register allocators:</p>
<ul>
- <li><i>Simple</i> — This is a very simple implementation that does not
- keep values in registers across instructions. This register allocator
- immediately spills every value right after it is computed, and reloads all
- used operands from memory to temporary registers before each
- instruction.</li>
-
- <li><i>Local</i> — This register allocator is an improvement on the
- <i>Simple</i> implementation. It allocates registers on a basic block
- level, attempting to keep values in registers and reusing registers as
- appropriate.</li>
-
- <li><i>Linear Scan</i> — <i>The default allocator</i>. This is the
- well-know linear scan register allocator. Whereas the
- <i>Simple</i> and <i>Local</i> algorithms use a direct mapping
- implementation technique, the <i>Linear Scan</i> implementation
- uses a spiller in order to place load and stores.</li>
+ <li><i>Fast</i> — This register allocator is the default for debug
+ builds. It allocates registers on a basic block level, attempting to keep
+ values in registers and reusing registers as appropriate.</li>
+
+ <li><i>Basic</i> — This is an incremental approach to register
+ allocation. Live ranges are assigned to registers one at a time in
+ an order that is driven by heuristics. Since code can be rewritten
+ on-the-fly during allocation, this framework allows interesting
+ allocators to be developed as extensions. It is not itself a
+ production register allocator but is a potentially useful
+ stand-alone mode for triaging bugs and as a performance baseline.
+
+ <li><i>Greedy</i> — <i>The default allocator</i>. This is a
+ highly tuned implementation of the <i>Basic</i> allocator that
+ incorporates global live range splitting. This allocator works hard
+ to minimize the cost of spill code.
+
+ <li><i>PBQP</i> — A Partitioned Boolean Quadratic Programming (PBQP)
+ based register allocator. This allocator works by constructing a PBQP
+ problem representing the register allocation problem under consideration,
+ solving this using a PBQP solver, and mapping the solution back to a
+ register assignment.</li>
</ul>
<p>The type of register allocator used in <tt>llc</tt> can be chosen with the
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-$ llc -regalloc=simple file.bc -o sp.s;
-$ llc -regalloc=local file.bc -o lc.s;
$ llc -regalloc=linearscan file.bc -o ln.s;
+$ llc -regalloc=fast file.bc -o fa.s;
+$ llc -regalloc=pbqp file.bc -o pbqp.s;
</pre>
</div>
</div>
+</div>
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="proepicode">Prolog/Epilog Code Insertion</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4>
+ <a name="compact_unwind">Compact Unwind</a>
+</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>Throwing an exception requires <em>unwinding</em> out of a function. The
+ information on how to unwind a given function is traditionally expressed in
+ DWARF unwind (a.k.a. frame) info. But that format was originally developed
+ for debuggers to backtrace, and each Frame Description Entry (FDE) requires
+ ~20-30 bytes per function. There is also the cost of mapping from an address
+ in a function to the corresponding FDE at runtime. An alternative unwind
+ encoding is called <em>compact unwind</em> and requires just 4-bytes per
+ function.</p>
+
+<p>The compact unwind encoding is a 32-bit value, which is encoded in an
+ architecture-specific way. It specifies which registers to restore and from
+ where, and how to unwind out of the function. When the linker creates a final
+ linked image, it will create a <code>__TEXT,__unwind_info</code>
+ section. This section is a small and fast way for the runtime to access
+ unwind info for any given function. If we emit compact unwind info for the
+ function, that compact unwind info will be encoded in
+ the <code>__TEXT,__unwind_info</code> section. If we emit DWARF unwind info,
+ the <code>__TEXT,__unwind_info</code> section will contain the offset of the
+ FDE in the <code>__TEXT,__eh_frame</code> section in the final linked
+ image.</p>
+
+<p>For X86, there are three modes for the compact unwind encoding:</p>
+
+<dl>
+ <dt><i>Function with a Frame Pointer (<code>EBP</code> or <code>RBP</code>)</i></dt>
+ <dd><p><code>EBP/RBP</code>-based frame, where <code>EBP/RBP</code> is pushed
+ onto the stack immediately after the return address,
+ then <code>ESP/RSP</code> is moved to <code>EBP/RBP</code>. Thus to
+ unwind, <code>ESP/RSP</code> is restored with the
+ current <code>EBP/RBP</code> value, then <code>EBP/RBP</code> is restored
+ by popping the stack, and the return is done by popping the stack once
+ more into the PC. All non-volatile registers that need to be restored must
+ have been saved in a small range on the stack that
+ starts <code>EBP-4</code> to <code>EBP-1020</code> (<code>RBP-8</code>
+ to <code>RBP-1020</code>). The offset (divided by 4 in 32-bit mode and 8
+ in 64-bit mode) is encoded in bits 16-23 (mask: <code>0x00FF0000</code>).
+ The registers saved are encoded in bits 0-14
+ (mask: <code>0x00007FFF</code>) as five 3-bit entries from the following
+ table:</p>
+<table border="1" cellspacing="0">
+ <tr>
+ <th>Compact Number</th>
+ <th>i386 Register</th>
+ <th>x86-64 Regiser</th>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>1</td>
+ <td><code>EBX</code></td>
+ <td><code>RBX</code></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>2</td>
+ <td><code>ECX</code></td>
+ <td><code>R12</code></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>3</td>
+ <td><code>EDX</code></td>
+ <td><code>R13</code></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>4</td>
+ <td><code>EDI</code></td>
+ <td><code>R14</code></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>5</td>
+ <td><code>ESI</code></td>
+ <td><code>R15</code></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>6</td>
+ <td><code>EBP</code></td>
+ <td><code>RBP</code></td>
+ </tr>
+</table>
+
+</dd>
+
+ <dt><i>Frameless with a Small Constant Stack Size (<code>EBP</code>
+ or <code>RBP</code> is not used as a frame pointer)</i></dt>
+ <dd><p>To return, a constant (encoded in the compact unwind encoding) is added
+ to the <code>ESP/RSP</code>. Then the return is done by popping the stack
+ into the PC. All non-volatile registers that need to be restored must have
+ been saved on the stack immediately after the return address. The stack
+ size (divided by 4 in 32-bit mode and 8 in 64-bit mode) is encoded in bits
+ 16-23 (mask: <code>0x00FF0000</code>). There is a maximum stack size of
+ 1024 bytes in 32-bit mode and 2048 in 64-bit mode. The number of registers
+ saved is encoded in bits 9-12 (mask: <code>0x00001C00</code>). Bits 0-9
+ (mask: <code>0x000003FF</code>) contain which registers were saved and
+ their order. (See
+ the <code>encodeCompactUnwindRegistersWithoutFrame()</code> function
+ in <code>lib/Target/X86FrameLowering.cpp</code> for the encoding
+ algorithm.)</p></dd>
+
+ <dt><i>Frameless with a Large Constant Stack Size (<code>EBP</code>
+ or <code>RBP</code> is not used as a frame pointer)</i></dt>
+ <dd><p>This case is like the "Frameless with a Small Constant Stack Size"
+ case, but the stack size is too large to encode in the compact unwind
+ encoding. Instead it requires that the function contains "<code>subl
+ $nnnnnn, %esp</code>" in its prolog. The compact encoding contains the
+ offset to the <code>$nnnnnn</code> value in the function in bits 9-12
+ (mask: <code>0x00001C00</code>).</p></dd>
+</dl>
+
+</div>
+
</div>
-<div class="doc_text"><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="latemco">Late Machine Code Optimizations</a>
-</div>
-<div class="doc_text"><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+</h3>
+<div><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="codeemit">Code Emission</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>The code emission step of code generation is responsible for lowering from
+the code generator abstractions (like <a
+href="#machinefunction">MachineFunction</a>, <a
+href="#machineinstr">MachineInstr</a>, etc) down
+to the abstractions used by the MC layer (<a href="#mcinst">MCInst</a>,
+<a href="#mcstreamer">MCStreamer</a>, etc). This is
+done with a combination of several different classes: the (misnamed)
+target-independent AsmPrinter class, target-specific subclasses of AsmPrinter
+(such as SparcAsmPrinter), and the TargetLoweringObjectFile class.</p>
+
+<p>Since the MC layer works at the level of abstraction of object files, it
+doesn't have a notion of functions, global variables etc. Instead, it thinks
+about labels, directives, and instructions. A key class used at this time is
+the MCStreamer class. This is an abstract API that is implemented in different
+ways (e.g. to output a .s file, output an ELF .o file, etc) that is effectively
+an "assembler API". MCStreamer has one method per directive, such as EmitLabel,
+EmitSymbolAttribute, SwitchSection, etc, which directly correspond to assembly
+level directives.
+</p>
+
+<p>If you are interested in implementing a code generator for a target, there
+are three important things that you have to implement for your target:</p>
+
+<ol>
+<li>First, you need a subclass of AsmPrinter for your target. This class
+implements the general lowering process converting MachineFunction's into MC
+label constructs. The AsmPrinter base class provides a number of useful methods
+and routines, and also allows you to override the lowering process in some
+important ways. You should get much of the lowering for free if you are
+implementing an ELF, COFF, or MachO target, because the TargetLoweringObjectFile
+class implements much of the common logic.</li>
+
+<li>Second, you need to implement an instruction printer for your target. The
+instruction printer takes an <a href="#mcinst">MCInst</a> and renders it to a
+raw_ostream as text. Most of this is automatically generated from the .td file
+(when you specify something like "<tt>add $dst, $src1, $src2</tt>" in the
+instructions), but you need to implement routines to print operands.</li>
+
+<li>Third, you need to implement code that lowers a <a
+href="#machineinstr">MachineInstr</a> to an MCInst, usually implemented in
+"<target>MCInstLower.cpp". This lowering process is often target
+specific, and is responsible for turning jump table entries, constant pool
+indices, global variable addresses, etc into MCLabels as appropriate. This
+translation layer is also responsible for expanding pseudo ops used by the code
+generator into the actual machine instructions they correspond to. The MCInsts
+that are generated by this are fed into the instruction printer or the encoder.
+</li>
+
+</ol>
+
+<p>Finally, at your choosing, you can also implement an subclass of
+MCCodeEmitter which lowers MCInst's into machine code bytes and relocations.
+This is important if you want to support direct .o file emission, or would like
+to implement an assembler for your target.</p>
+
</div>
-<div class="doc_text"><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="vliw_packetizer">VLIW Packetizer</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>In a Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW) architecture, the compiler is
+ responsible for mapping instructions to functional-units available on
+ the architecture. To that end, the compiler creates groups of instructions
+ called <i>packets</i> or <i>bundles</i>. The VLIW packetizer in LLVM is
+ a target-independent mechanism to enable the packetization of machine
+ instructions.</p>
+
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="codeemit_asm">Generating Assembly Code</a>
+
+<h4>
+ <a name="vliw_mapping">Mapping from instructions to functional units</a>
+</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>Instructions in a VLIW target can typically be mapped to multiple functional
+units. During the process of packetizing, the compiler must be able to reason
+about whether an instruction can be added to a packet. This decision can be
+complex since the compiler has to examine all possible mappings of instructions
+to functional units. Therefore to alleviate compilation-time complexity, the
+VLIW packetizer parses the instruction classes of a target and generates tables
+at compiler build time. These tables can then be queried by the provided
+machine-independent API to determine if an instruction can be accommodated in a
+packet.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h4>
+ <a name="vliw_repr">
+ How the packetization tables are generated and used
+ </a>
+</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>The packetizer reads instruction classes from a target's itineraries and
+creates a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) to represent the state of a
+packet. A DFA consists of three major elements: inputs, states, and
+transitions. The set of inputs for the generated DFA represents the instruction
+being added to a packet. The states represent the possible consumption
+of functional units by instructions in a packet. In the DFA, transitions from
+one state to another occur on the addition of an instruction to an existing
+packet. If there is a legal mapping of functional units to instructions, then
+the DFA contains a corresponding transition. The absence of a transition
+indicates that a legal mapping does not exist and that the instruction cannot
+be added to the packet.</p>
+
+<p>To generate tables for a VLIW target, add <i>Target</i>GenDFAPacketizer.inc
+as a target to the Makefile in the target directory. The exported API provides
+three functions: <tt>DFAPacketizer::clearResources()</tt>,
+<tt>DFAPacketizer::reserveResources(MachineInstr *MI)</tt>, and
+<tt>DFAPacketizer::canReserveResources(MachineInstr *MI)</tt>. These functions
+allow a target packetizer to add an instruction to an existing packet and to
+check whether an instruction can be added to a packet. See
+<tt>llvm/CodeGen/DFAPacketizer.h</tt> for more information.</p>
+
</div>
-<div class="doc_text"><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<h2>
+ <a name="nativeassembler">Implementing a Native Assembler</a>
+</h2>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div>
+
+<p>Though you're probably reading this because you want to write or maintain a
+compiler backend, LLVM also fully supports building a native assemblers too.
+We've tried hard to automate the generation of the assembler from the .td files
+(in particular the instruction syntax and encodings), which means that a large
+part of the manual and repetitive data entry can be factored and shared with the
+compiler.</p>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3 id="na_instparsing">Instruction Parsing</h3>
+
+<div><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3 id="na_instaliases">
+ Instruction Alias Processing
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+<p>Once the instruction is parsed, it enters the MatchInstructionImpl function.
+The MatchInstructionImpl function performs alias processing and then does
+actual matching.</p>
+
+<p>Alias processing is the phase that canonicalizes different lexical forms of
+the same instructions down to one representation. There are several different
+kinds of alias that are possible to implement and they are listed below in the
+order that they are processed (which is in order from simplest/weakest to most
+complex/powerful). Generally you want to use the first alias mechanism that
+meets the needs of your instruction, because it will allow a more concise
+description.</p>
+
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="codeemit_bin">Generating Binary Machine Code</a>
+<h4>Mnemonic Aliases</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>The first phase of alias processing is simple instruction mnemonic
+remapping for classes of instructions which are allowed with two different
+mnemonics. This phase is a simple and unconditionally remapping from one input
+mnemonic to one output mnemonic. It isn't possible for this form of alias to
+look at the operands at all, so the remapping must apply for all forms of a
+given mnemonic. Mnemonic aliases are defined simply, for example X86 has:
+</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+def : MnemonicAlias<"cbw", "cbtw">;
+def : MnemonicAlias<"smovq", "movsq">;
+def : MnemonicAlias<"fldcww", "fldcw">;
+def : MnemonicAlias<"fucompi", "fucomip">;
+def : MnemonicAlias<"ud2a", "ud2">;
+</pre>
</div>
-<div class="doc_text">
- <p>For the JIT or <tt>.o</tt> file writer</p>
+<p>... and many others. With a MnemonicAlias definition, the mnemonic is
+remapped simply and directly. Though MnemonicAlias's can't look at any aspect
+of the instruction (such as the operands) they can depend on global modes (the
+same ones supported by the matcher), through a Requires clause:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+def : MnemonicAlias<"pushf", "pushfq">, Requires<[In64BitMode]>;
+def : MnemonicAlias<"pushf", "pushfl">, Requires<[In32BitMode]>;
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>In this example, the mnemonic gets mapped into different a new one depending
+on the current instruction set.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4>Instruction Aliases</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>The most general phase of alias processing occurs while matching is
+happening: it provides new forms for the matcher to match along with a specific
+instruction to generate. An instruction alias has two parts: the string to
+match and the instruction to generate. For example:
+</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+def : InstAlias<"movsx $src, $dst", (MOVSX16rr8W GR16:$dst, GR8 :$src)>;
+def : InstAlias<"movsx $src, $dst", (MOVSX16rm8W GR16:$dst, i8mem:$src)>;
+def : InstAlias<"movsx $src, $dst", (MOVSX32rr8 GR32:$dst, GR8 :$src)>;
+def : InstAlias<"movsx $src, $dst", (MOVSX32rr16 GR32:$dst, GR16 :$src)>;
+def : InstAlias<"movsx $src, $dst", (MOVSX64rr8 GR64:$dst, GR8 :$src)>;
+def : InstAlias<"movsx $src, $dst", (MOVSX64rr16 GR64:$dst, GR16 :$src)>;
+def : InstAlias<"movsx $src, $dst", (MOVSX64rr32 GR64:$dst, GR32 :$src)>;
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>This shows a powerful example of the instruction aliases, matching the
+same mnemonic in multiple different ways depending on what operands are present
+in the assembly. The result of instruction aliases can include operands in a
+different order than the destination instruction, and can use an input
+multiple times, for example:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+def : InstAlias<"clrb $reg", (XOR8rr GR8 :$reg, GR8 :$reg)>;
+def : InstAlias<"clrw $reg", (XOR16rr GR16:$reg, GR16:$reg)>;
+def : InstAlias<"clrl $reg", (XOR32rr GR32:$reg, GR32:$reg)>;
+def : InstAlias<"clrq $reg", (XOR64rr GR64:$reg, GR64:$reg)>;
+</pre>
</div>
+<p>This example also shows that tied operands are only listed once. In the X86
+backend, XOR8rr has two input GR8's and one output GR8 (where an input is tied
+to the output). InstAliases take a flattened operand list without duplicates
+for tied operands. The result of an instruction alias can also use immediates
+and fixed physical registers which are added as simple immediate operands in the
+result, for example:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+// Fixed Immediate operand.
+def : InstAlias<"aad", (AAD8i8 10)>;
+
+// Fixed register operand.
+def : InstAlias<"fcomi", (COM_FIr ST1)>;
+
+// Simple alias.
+def : InstAlias<"fcomi $reg", (COM_FIr RST:$reg)>;
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+
+<p>Instruction aliases can also have a Requires clause to make them
+subtarget specific.</p>
+
+<p>If the back-end supports it, the instruction printer can automatically emit
+ the alias rather than what's being aliased. It typically leads to better,
+ more readable code. If it's better to print out what's being aliased, then
+ pass a '0' as the third parameter to the InstAlias definition.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3 id="na_matching">Instruction Matching</h3>
+
+<div><p>To Be Written</p></div>
+
+</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
+<h2>
<a name="targetimpls">Target-specific Implementation Notes</a>
-</div>
+</h2>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>This section of the document explains features or design decisions that are
- specific to the code generator for a particular target.</p>
+ specific to the code generator for a particular target. First we start
+ with a table that summarizes what features are supported by each target.</p>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="targetfeatures">Target Feature Matrix</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>Note that this table does not include the C backend or Cpp backends, since
+they do not use the target independent code generator infrastructure. It also
+doesn't list features that are not supported fully by any target yet. It
+considers a feature to be supported if at least one subtarget supports it. A
+feature being supported means that it is useful and works for most cases, it
+does not indicate that there are zero known bugs in the implementation. Here
+is the key:</p>
+
+
+<table border="1" cellspacing="0">
+ <tr>
+ <th>Unknown</th>
+ <th>No support</th>
+ <th>Partial Support</th>
+ <th>Complete Support</th>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="unknown"></td>
+ <td class="no"></td>
+ <td class="partial"></td>
+ <td class="yes"></td>
+ </tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>Here is the table:</p>
+
+<table width="689" border="1" cellspacing="0">
+<tr><td></td>
+<td colspan="13" align="center" style="background-color:#ffc">Target</td>
+</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <th>Feature</th>
+ <th>ARM</th>
+ <th>CellSPU</th>
+ <th>Hexagon</th>
+ <th>MBlaze</th>
+ <th>MSP430</th>
+ <th>Mips</th>
+ <th>PTX</th>
+ <th>PowerPC</th>
+ <th>Sparc</th>
+ <th>X86</th>
+ <th>XCore</th>
+ </tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_reliable">is generally reliable</a></td>
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_asmparser">assembly parser</a></td>
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_disassembler">disassembler</a></td>
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_inlineasm">inline asm</a></td>
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_jit">jit</a></td>
+ <td class="partial"><a href="#feat_jit_arm">*</a></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_objectwrite">.o file writing</a></td>
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_tailcall">tail calls</a></td>
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="yes"></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="unknown"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+ <td><a href="#feat_segstacks">segmented stacks</a></td>
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- ARM -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- CellSPU -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Hexagon -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MBlaze -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- MSP430 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Mips -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PTX -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- PowerPC -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- Sparc -->
+ <td class="partial"><a href="#feat_segstacks_x86">*</a></td> <!-- X86 -->
+ <td class="no"></td> <!-- XCore -->
+</tr>
+
+
+</table>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_reliable">Is Generally Reliable</h4>
+
+<div>
+<p>This box indicates whether the target is considered to be production quality.
+This indicates that the target has been used as a static compiler to
+compile large amounts of code by a variety of different people and is in
+continuous use.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_asmparser">Assembly Parser</h4>
+
+<div>
+<p>This box indicates whether the target supports parsing target specific .s
+files by implementing the MCAsmParser interface. This is required for llvm-mc
+to be able to act as a native assembler and is required for inline assembly
+support in the native .o file writer.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_disassembler">Disassembler</h4>
+
+<div>
+<p>This box indicates whether the target supports the MCDisassembler API for
+disassembling machine opcode bytes into MCInst's.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_inlineasm">Inline Asm</h4>
+
+<div>
+<p>This box indicates whether the target supports most popular inline assembly
+constraints and modifiers.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_jit">JIT Support</h4>
+
+<div>
+<p>This box indicates whether the target supports the JIT compiler through
+the ExecutionEngine interface.</p>
+
+<p id="feat_jit_arm">The ARM backend has basic support for integer code
+in ARM codegen mode, but lacks NEON and full Thumb support.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_objectwrite">.o File Writing</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>This box indicates whether the target supports writing .o files (e.g. MachO,
+ELF, and/or COFF) files directly from the target. Note that the target also
+must include an assembly parser and general inline assembly support for full
+inline assembly support in the .o writer.</p>
+
+<p>Targets that don't support this feature can obviously still write out .o
+files, they just rely on having an external assembler to translate from a .s
+file to a .o file (as is the case for many C compilers).</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_tailcall">Tail Calls</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>This box indicates whether the target supports guaranteed tail calls. These
+are calls marked "<a href="LangRef.html#i_call">tail</a>" and use the fastcc
+calling convention. Please see the <a href="#tailcallopt">tail call section
+more more details</a>.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<h4 id="feat_segstacks">Segmented Stacks</h4>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>This box indicates whether the target supports segmented stacks. This
+replaces the traditional large C stack with many linked segments. It
+is compatible with the <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SplitStacks">gcc
+implementation</a> used by the Go front end.</p>
+
+<p id="feat_segstacks_x86">Basic support exists on the X86 backend. Currently
+vararg doesn't work and the object files are not marked the way the gold
+linker expects, but simple Go programs can be built by dragonegg.</p>
+
+</div>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="tailcallopt">Tail call optimization</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>Tail call optimization, callee reusing the stack of the caller, is currently
supported on x86/x86-64 and PowerPC. It is performed if:</p>
<ul>
- <li>Caller and callee have the calling convention <tt>fastcc</tt>.</li>
+ <li>Caller and callee have the calling convention <tt>fastcc</tt> or
+ <tt>cc 10</tt> (GHC call convention).</li>
<li>The call is a tail call - in tail position (ret immediately follows call
and ret uses value of call or is void).</li>
(because one or more of above constraints are not met) to be followed by a
readjustment of the stack. So performance might be worse in such cases.</p>
-<p>On x86 and x86-64 one register is reserved for indirect tail calls (e.g via a
- function pointer). So there is one less register for integer argument
- passing. For x86 this means 2 registers (if <tt>inreg</tt> parameter
- attribute is used) and for x86-64 this means 5 register are used.</p>
+</div>
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="sibcallopt">Sibling call optimization</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>Sibling call optimization is a restricted form of tail call optimization.
+ Unlike tail call optimization described in the previous section, it can be
+ performed automatically on any tail calls when <tt>-tailcallopt</tt> option
+ is not specified.</p>
+
+<p>Sibling call optimization is currently performed on x86/x86-64 when the
+ following constraints are met:</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Caller and callee have the same calling convention. It can be either
+ <tt>c</tt> or <tt>fastcc</tt>.
+
+ <li>The call is a tail call - in tail position (ret immediately follows call
+ and ret uses value of call or is void).</li>
+
+ <li>Caller and callee have matching return type or the callee result is not
+ used.
+
+ <li>If any of the callee arguments are being passed in stack, they must be
+ available in caller's own incoming argument stack and the frame offsets
+ must be the same.
+</ul>
+
+<p>Example:</p>
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+declare i32 @bar(i32, i32)
+
+define i32 @foo(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c) {
+entry:
+ %0 = tail call i32 @bar(i32 %a, i32 %b)
+ ret i32 %0
+}
+</pre>
+</div>
</div>
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="x86">The X86 backend</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The X86 code generator lives in the <tt>lib/Target/X86</tt> directory. This
code generator is capable of targeting a variety of x86-32 and x86-64
processors, and includes support for ISA extensions such as MMX and SSE.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="x86_tt">X86 Target Triples supported</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The following are the known target triples that are supported by the X86
backend. This is not an exhaustive list, and it would be useful to add those
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="x86_cc">X86 Calling Conventions supported</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The following target-specific calling conventions are known to backend:</p>
<ul>
- <li><b>x86_StdCall</b> — stdcall calling convention seen on Microsoft
- Windows platform (CC ID = 64).</li>
-
- <li><b>x86_FastCall</b> — fastcall calling convention seen on Microsoft
- Windows platform (CC ID = 65).</li>
+<li><b>x86_StdCall</b> — stdcall calling convention seen on Microsoft
+ Windows platform (CC ID = 64).</li>
+<li><b>x86_FastCall</b> — fastcall calling convention seen on Microsoft
+ Windows platform (CC ID = 65).</li>
+<li><b>x86_ThisCall</b> — Similar to X86_StdCall. Passes first argument
+ in ECX, others via stack. Callee is responsible for stack cleaning. This
+ convention is used by MSVC by default for methods in its ABI
+ (CC ID = 70).</li>
</ul>
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="x86_memory">Representing X86 addressing modes in MachineInstrs</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The x86 has a very flexible way of accessing memory. It is capable of
forming memory addresses of the following expression directly in integer
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="x86_memory">X86 address spaces supported</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
-<p>x86 has an experimental feature which provides
+<p>x86 has a feature which provides
the ability to perform loads and stores to different address spaces
via the x86 segment registers. A segment override prefix byte on an
instruction causes the instruction's memory access to go to the specified
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="x86_names">Instruction naming</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>An instruction name consists of the base name, a default operand size, and a
a character per operand with an optional special size. For example:</p>
</div>
+</div>
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
+<h3>
<a name="ppc">The PowerPC backend</a>
-</div>
+</h3>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The PowerPC code generator lives in the lib/Target/PowerPC directory. The
code generation is retargetable to several variations or <i>subtargets</i> of
the PowerPC ISA; including ppc32, ppc64 and altivec.</p>
-</div>
-
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="ppc_abi">LLVM PowerPC ABI</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>LLVM follows the AIX PowerPC ABI, with two deviations. LLVM uses a PC
relative (PIC) or static addressing for accessing global values, so no TOC
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="ppc_frame">Frame Layout</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The size of a PowerPC frame is usually fixed for the duration of a
function's invocation. Since the frame is fixed size, all references
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="ppc_prolog">Prolog/Epilog</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p>The llvm prolog and epilog are the same as described in the PowerPC ABI, with
the following exceptions. Callee saved registers are spilled after the frame
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+<h4>
<a name="ppc_dynamic">Dynamic Allocation</a>
-</div>
+</h4>
-<div class="doc_text">
+<div>
<p><i>TODO - More to come.</i></p>
</div>
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<h3>
+ <a name="ptx">The PTX backend</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div>
+
+<p>The PTX code generator lives in the lib/Target/PTX directory. It is
+ currently a work-in-progress, but already supports most of the code
+ generation functionality needed to generate correct PTX kernels for
+ CUDA devices.</p>
+
+<p>The code generator can target PTX 2.0+, and shader model 1.0+. The
+ PTX ISA Reference Manual is used as the primary source of ISA
+ information, though an effort is made to make the output of the code
+ generator match the output of the NVidia nvcc compiler, whenever
+ possible.</p>
+
+<p>Code Generator Options:</p>
+<table border="1" cellspacing="0">
+ <tr>
+ <th>Option</th>
+ <th>Description</th>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td><code>double</code></td>
+ <td align="left">If enabled, the map_f64_to_f32 directive is
+ disabled in the PTX output, allowing native double-precision
+ arithmetic</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td><code>no-fma</code></td>
+ <td align="left">Disable generation of Fused-Multiply Add
+ instructions, which may be beneficial for some devices</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td><code>smxy / computexy</code></td>
+ <td align="left">Set shader model/compute capability to x.y,
+ e.g. sm20 or compute13</td>
+ </tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>Working:</p>
+<ul>
+ <li>Arithmetic instruction selection (including combo FMA)</li>
+ <li>Bitwise instruction selection</li>
+ <li>Control-flow instruction selection</li>
+ <li>Function calls (only on SM 2.0+ and no return arguments)</li>
+ <li>Addresses spaces (0 = global, 1 = constant, 2 = local, 4 =
+ shared)</li>
+ <li>Thread synchronization (bar.sync)</li>
+ <li>Special register reads ([N]TID, [N]CTAID, PMx, CLOCK, etc.)</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>In Progress:</p>
+<ul>
+ <li>Robust call instruction selection</li>
+ <li>Stack frame allocation</li>
+ <li>Device-specific instruction scheduling optimizations</li>
+</ul>
+
+
+</div>
+
+</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<hr>
src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401-blue" alt="Valid HTML 4.01"></a>
<a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
- <a href="http://llvm.org">The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
+ <a href="http://llvm.org/">The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
Last modified: $Date$
</address>
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff