Calculate store visibility probability and change the shift of a few hashtables in...
[c11tester.git] / execution.cc
index fe27e2ff70ee41c0aa193179ae007cab673d90fc..87dbe69eeeea320257cda85dc16b905665502529 100644 (file)
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int ModelExecution::get_execution_number() const
        return model->get_execution_number();
 }
 
-static action_list_t * get_safe_ptr_action(HashTable<const void *, action_list_t *, uintptr_t, 4> * hash, void * ptr)
+static action_list_t * get_safe_ptr_action(HashTable<const void *, action_list_t *, uintptr_t, 2> * hash, void * ptr)
 {
        action_list_t *tmp = hash->get(ptr);
        if (tmp == NULL) {
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static action_list_t * get_safe_ptr_action(HashTable<const void *, action_list_t
        return tmp;
 }
 
-static SnapVector<action_list_t> * get_safe_ptr_vect_action(HashTable<const void *, SnapVector<action_list_t> *, uintptr_t, 4> * hash, void * ptr)
+static SnapVector<action_list_t> * get_safe_ptr_vect_action(HashTable<const void *, SnapVector<action_list_t> *, uintptr_t, 2> * hash, void * ptr)
 {
        SnapVector<action_list_t> *tmp = hash->get(ptr);
        if (tmp == NULL) {
@@ -373,7 +373,27 @@ bool ModelExecution::process_mutex(ModelAction *curr)
                }
                break;
        }
-       case ATOMIC_WAIT:
+       case ATOMIC_WAIT: {
+               /* wake up the other threads */
+               for (unsigned int i = 0;i < get_num_threads();i++) {
+                       Thread *t = get_thread(int_to_id(i));
+                       Thread *curr_thrd = get_thread(curr);
+                       if (t->waiting_on() == curr_thrd && t->get_pending()->is_lock())
+                               scheduler->wake(t);
+               }
+
+               /* unlock the lock - after checking who was waiting on it */
+               state->locked = NULL;
+
+               if (fuzzer->shouldWait(curr)) {
+                       /* disable this thread */
+                       get_safe_ptr_action(&condvar_waiters_map, curr->get_location())->push_back(curr);
+                       scheduler->sleep(get_thread(curr));
+               }
+
+               break;
+       }
+       case ATOMIC_TIMEDWAIT:
        case ATOMIC_UNLOCK: {
                //TODO: FIX WAIT SITUATION...WAITS CAN SPURIOUSLY FAIL...TIMED WAITS SHOULD PROBABLY JUST BE THE SAME AS NORMAL WAITS...THINK ABOUT PROBABILITIES THOUGH....AS IN TIMED WAIT MUST FAIL TO GUARANTEE PROGRESS...NORMAL WAIT MAY FAIL...SO NEED NORMAL WAIT TO WORK CORRECTLY IN THE CASE IT SPURIOUSLY FAILS AND IN THE CASE IT DOESN'T...  TIMED WAITS MUST EVENMTUALLY RELEASE...
 
@@ -387,10 +407,6 @@ bool ModelExecution::process_mutex(ModelAction *curr)
 
                /* unlock the lock - after checking who was waiting on it */
                state->locked = NULL;
-
-               if (!curr->is_wait())
-                       break;/* The rest is only for ATOMIC_WAIT */
-
                break;
        }
        case ATOMIC_NOTIFY_ALL: {
@@ -1671,7 +1687,7 @@ bool ModelExecution::is_enabled(thread_id_t tid) const
 Thread * ModelExecution::action_select_next_thread(const ModelAction *curr) const
 {
        /* Do not split atomic RMW */
-       if (curr->is_rmwr())
+       if (curr->is_rmwr() && !paused_by_fuzzer(curr))
                return get_thread(curr);
        /* Follow CREATE with the created thread */
        /* which is not needed, because model.cc takes care of this */
@@ -1683,6 +1699,15 @@ Thread * ModelExecution::action_select_next_thread(const ModelAction *curr) cons
        return NULL;
 }
 
+/** @param act A read atomic action */
+bool ModelExecution::paused_by_fuzzer(const ModelAction * act) const
+{
+       ASSERT(act->is_read());
+
+       // Actions paused by fuzzer have their sequence number reset to 0
+       return act->get_seq_number() == 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * Takes the next step in the execution, if possible.
  * @param curr The current step to take