Speculative fix for Windows build after r220932

[oota-llvm.git] / lib / Transforms / Utils / SimplifyInstructions.cpp

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyInstructions.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyInstructions.cpp
index 8b2eeb99287868dd2fd487fac4bb7f60e9d69be5..5632095b1249ff26f5522f509f087fdec64a2fca 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyInstructions.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyInstructions.cpp
@@ -14,21 +14,23 @@
 //
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
-#define DEBUG_TYPE "instsimplify"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionTracker.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h"
-#include "llvm/DataLayout.h"
-#include "llvm/Function.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Type.h"
 #include "llvm/Pass.h"
 #include "llvm/Target/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
-#include "llvm/Type.h"
 using namespace llvm;
 
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "instsimplify"
+
 STATISTIC(NumSimplified, "Number of redundant instructions removed");
 
 namespace {
@@ -38,23 +40,29 @@ namespace {
       initializeInstSimplifierPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
     }
 
-    void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
+    void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
       AU.setPreservesCFG();
+      AU.addRequired<AssumptionTracker>();
       AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfo>();
     }
 
     /// runOnFunction - Remove instructions that simplify.
-    bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
-      const DominatorTree *DT = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTree>();
-      const DataLayout *TD = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DataLayout>();
+    bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override {
+      const DominatorTreeWrapperPass *DTWP =
+          getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
+      const DominatorTree *DT = DTWP ? &DTWP->getDomTree() : nullptr;
+      DataLayoutPass *DLP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DataLayoutPass>();
+      const DataLayout *DL = DLP ? &DLP->getDataLayout() : nullptr;
       const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI = &getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfo>();
+      AssumptionTracker *AT = &getAnalysis<AssumptionTracker>();
       SmallPtrSet<const Instruction*, 8> S1, S2, *ToSimplify = &S1, *Next = &S2;
       bool Changed = false;
 
       do {
-        for (df_iterator<BasicBlock*> DI = df_begin(&F.getEntryBlock()),
-             DE = df_end(&F.getEntryBlock()); DI != DE; ++DI)
-          for (BasicBlock::iterator BI = DI->begin(), BE = DI->end(); BI != BE;) {
+        for (BasicBlock *BB : depth_first(&F.getEntryBlock()))
+          // Here be subtlety: the iterator must be incremented before the loop
+          // body (not sure why), so a range-for loop won't work here.
+          for (BasicBlock::iterator BI = BB->begin(), BE = BB->end(); BI != BE;) {
             Instruction *I = BI++;
             // The first time through the loop ToSimplify is empty and we try to
             // simplify all instructions.  On later iterations ToSimplify is not
@@ -63,16 +71,23 @@ namespace {
               continue;
             // Don't waste time simplifying unused instructions.
             if (!I->use_empty())
-              if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(I, TD, TLI, DT)) {
+              if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(I, DL, TLI, DT, AT)) {
                 // Mark all uses for resimplification next time round the loop.
-                for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->use_begin(), UE = I->use_end();
-                     UI != UE; ++UI)
-                  Next->insert(cast<Instruction>(*UI));
+                for (User *U : I->users())
+                  Next->insert(cast<Instruction>(U));
                 I->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
                 ++NumSimplified;
                 Changed = true;
               }
-            Changed |= RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(I, TLI);
+            bool res = RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(I, TLI);
+            if (res)  {
+              // RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstruction can remove
+              // more than one instruction, so simply incrementing the
+              // iterator does not work. When instructions get deleted
+              // re-iterate instead.
+              BI = BB->begin(); BE = BB->end();
+              Changed |= res;
+            }
           }
 
         // Place the list of instructions to simplify on the next loop iteration
@@ -89,6 +104,7 @@ namespace {
 char InstSimplifier::ID = 0;
 INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(InstSimplifier, "instsimplify",
                       "Remove redundant instructions", false, false)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(AssumptionTracker)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfo)
 INITIALIZE_PASS_END(InstSimplifier, "instsimplify",
                     "Remove redundant instructions", false, false)