#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetSubtargetInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
using namespace llvm;
+static cl::opt<bool> EnableAASchedMI("enable-aa-sched-mi", cl::Hidden,
+ cl::ZeroOrMore, cl::init(false),
+ cl::desc("Enable use of AA during MI GAD construction"));
+
ScheduleDAGInstrs::ScheduleDAGInstrs(MachineFunction &mf,
const MachineLoopInfo &mli,
const MachineDominatorTree &mdt,
DefI->SU->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Anti, 0, Reg));
}
+/// Return true if MI is an instruction we are unable to reason about
+/// (like a call or something with unmodeled side effects).
+static inline bool isGlobalMemoryObject(AliasAnalysis *AA, MachineInstr *MI) {
+ if (MI->isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() ||
+ (MI->hasVolatileMemoryRef() &&
+ (!MI->mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA))))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
+// This MI might have either incomplete info, or known to be unsafe
+// to deal with (i.e. volatile object).
+static inline bool isUnsafeMemoryObject(MachineInstr *MI,
+ const MachineFrameInfo *MFI) {
+ if (!MI || MI->memoperands_empty())
+ return true;
+ // We purposefully do no check for hasOneMemOperand() here
+ // in hope to trigger an assert downstream in order to
+ // finish implementation.
+ if ((*MI->memoperands_begin())->isVolatile() ||
+ MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects())
+ return true;
+
+ const Value *V = (*MI->memoperands_begin())->getValue();
+ if (!V)
+ return true;
+
+ V = getUnderlyingObject(V);
+ if (const PseudoSourceValue *PSV = dyn_cast<PseudoSourceValue>(V)) {
+ // Similarly to getUnderlyingObjectForInstr:
+ // For now, ignore PseudoSourceValues which may alias LLVM IR values
+ // because the code that uses this function has no way to cope with
+ // such aliases.
+ if (PSV->isAliased(MFI))
+ return true;
+ }
+ // Does this pointer refer to a distinct and identifiable object?
+ if (!isIdentifiedObject(V))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/// This returns true if the two MIs need a chain edge betwee them.
+/// If these are not even memory operations, we still may need
+/// chain deps between them. The question really is - could
+/// these two MIs be reordered during scheduling from memory dependency
+/// point of view.
+static bool MIsNeedChainEdge(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ MachineInstr *MIa,
+ MachineInstr *MIb) {
+ // Cover a trivial case - no edge is need to itself.
+ if (MIa == MIb)
+ return false;
+
+ if (isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIa, MFI) || isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIb, MFI))
+ return true;
+
+ // If we are dealing with two "normal" loads, we do not need an edge
+ // between them - they could be reordered.
+ if (!MIa->mayStore() && !MIb->mayStore())
+ return false;
+
+ // To this point analysis is generic. From here on we do need AA.
+ if (!AA)
+ return true;
+
+ MachineMemOperand *MMOa = *MIa->memoperands_begin();
+ MachineMemOperand *MMOb = *MIb->memoperands_begin();
+
+ // FIXME: Need to handle multiple memory operands to support all targets.
+ if (!MIa->hasOneMemOperand() || !MIb->hasOneMemOperand())
+ llvm_unreachable("Multiple memory operands.");
+
+ // The following interface to AA is fashioned after DAGCombiner::isAlias
+ // and operates with MachineMemOperand offset with some important
+ // assumptions:
+ // - LLVM fundamentally assumes flat address spaces.
+ // - MachineOperand offset can *only* result from legalization and
+ // cannot affect queries other than the trivial case of overlap
+ // checking.
+ // - These offsets never wrap and never step outside
+ // of allocated objects.
+ // - There should never be any negative offsets here.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Modify API to hide this math from "user"
+ // FIXME: Even before we go to AA we can reason locally about some
+ // memory objects. It can save compile time, and possibly catch some
+ // corner cases not currently covered.
+
+ assert ((MMOa->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset");
+ assert ((MMOb->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset");
+
+ int64_t MinOffset = std::min(MMOa->getOffset(), MMOb->getOffset());
+ int64_t Overlapa = MMOa->getSize() + MMOa->getOffset() - MinOffset;
+ int64_t Overlapb = MMOb->getSize() + MMOb->getOffset() - MinOffset;
+
+ AliasAnalysis::AliasResult AAResult = AA->alias(
+ AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOa->getValue(), Overlapa,
+ MMOa->getTBAAInfo()),
+ AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOb->getValue(), Overlapb,
+ MMOb->getTBAAInfo()));
+
+ return (AAResult != AliasAnalysis::NoAlias);
+}
+
+/// This recursive function iterates over chain deps of SUb looking for
+/// "latest" node that needs a chain edge to SUa.
+static unsigned
+iterateChainSucc(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb, SUnit *ExitSU, unsigned *Depth,
+ SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> &Visited) {
+ if (!SUa || !SUb || SUb == ExitSU)
+ return *Depth;
+
+ // Remember visited nodes.
+ if (!Visited.insert(SUb))
+ return *Depth;
+ // If there is _some_ dependency already in place, do not
+ // descend any further.
+ // TODO: Need to make sure that if that dependency got eliminated or ignored
+ // for any reason in the future, we would not violate DAG topology.
+ // Currently it does not happen, but makes an implicit assumption about
+ // future implementation.
+ //
+ // Independently, if we encounter node that is some sort of global
+ // object (like a call) we already have full set of dependencies to it
+ // and we can stop descending.
+ if (SUa->isSucc(SUb) ||
+ isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, SUb->getInstr()))
+ return *Depth;
+
+ // If we do need an edge, or we have exceeded depth budget,
+ // add that edge to the predecessors chain of SUb,
+ // and stop descending.
+ if (*Depth > 200 ||
+ MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr())) {
+ SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
+ /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ return *Depth;
+ }
+ // Track current depth.
+ (*Depth)++;
+ // Iterate over chain dependencies only.
+ for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator I = SUb->Succs.begin(), E = SUb->Succs.end();
+ I != E; ++I)
+ if (I->isCtrl())
+ iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SUa, I->getSUnit(), ExitSU, Depth, Visited);
+ return *Depth;
+}
+
+/// This function assumes that "downward" from SU there exist
+/// tail/leaf of already constructed DAG. It iterates downward and
+/// checks whether SU can be aliasing any node dominated
+/// by it.
+static void adjustChainDeps(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SU, SUnit *ExitSU, std::set<SUnit *> &CheckList) {
+ if (!SU)
+ return;
+
+ SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> Visited;
+ unsigned Depth = 0;
+
+ for (std::set<SUnit *>::iterator I = CheckList.begin(), IE = CheckList.end();
+ I != IE; ++I) {
+ if (SU == *I)
+ continue;
+ if (MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SU->getInstr(), (*I)->getInstr()))
+ (*I)->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
+ /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ // Now go through all the chain successors and iterate from them.
+ // Keep track of visited nodes.
+ for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator J = (*I)->Succs.begin(),
+ JE = (*I)->Succs.end(); J != JE; ++J)
+ if (J->isCtrl())
+ iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SU, J->getSUnit(),
+ ExitSU, &Depth, Visited);
+ }
+}
+
+/// Check whether two objects need a chain edge, if so, add it
+/// otherwise remember the rejected SU.
+static inline
+void addChainDependency (AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb,
+ std::set<SUnit *> &RejectList,
+ unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0,
+ bool isNormalMemory = false) {
+ // If this is a false dependency,
+ // do not add the edge, but rememeber the rejected node.
+ if (!EnableAASchedMI ||
+ MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr()))
+ SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency, /*Reg=*/0,
+ isNormalMemory));
+ else {
+ // Duplicate entries should be ignored.
+ RejectList.insert(SUb);
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tReject chain dep between SU("
+ << SUa->NodeNum << ") and SU("
+ << SUb->NodeNum << ")\n");
+ }
+}
+
/// Create an SUnit for each real instruction, numbered in top-down toplological
/// order. The instruction order A < B, implies that no edge exists from B to A.
///
// that are known not to alias
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *> AliasMemDefs, NonAliasMemDefs;
std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> > AliasMemUses, NonAliasMemUses;
+ std::set<SUnit*> RejectMemNodes;
// Remove any stale debug info; sometimes BuildSchedGraph is called again
// without emitting the info from the previous call.
// produce more precise dependence information.
#define STORE_LOAD_LATENCY 1
unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0;
- if (MI->isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() ||
- (MI->hasVolatileMemoryRef() &&
- (!MI->mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)))) {
+ if (isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, MI)) {
// Be conservative with these and add dependencies on all memory
// references, even those that are known to not alias.
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I =
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
}
- NonAliasMemDefs.clear();
- NonAliasMemUses.clear();
// Add SU to the barrier chain.
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
BarrierChain = SU;
+ // This is a barrier event that acts as a pivotal node in the DAG,
+ // so it is safe to clear list of exposed nodes.
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes);
+ RejectMemNodes.clear();
+ NonAliasMemDefs.clear();
+ NonAliasMemUses.clear();
// fall-through
new_alias_chain:
// Chain all possibly aliasing memory references though SU.
if (AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes);
AliasChain = SU;
for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k)
- PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I = AliasMemDefs.begin(),
- E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
- }
+ E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I)
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes);
for (std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> >::iterator I =
AliasMemUses.begin(), E = AliasMemUses.end(); I != E; ++I) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
- I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second[i], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
}
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes);
PendingLoads.clear();
AliasMemDefs.clear();
AliasMemUses.clear();
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE =
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end());
if (I != IE) {
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
- /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes,
+ 0, true);
I->second = SU;
} else {
if (MayAlias)
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemUses.end() : NonAliasMemUses.end());
if (J != JE) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = J->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
- J->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency,
- /*Reg=*/0, /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, J->second[i], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency, true);
J->second.clear();
}
if (MayAlias) {
// Add dependencies from all the PendingLoads, i.e. loads
// with no underlying object.
for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k)
- PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
// Add dependence on alias chain, if needed.
if (AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes);
+ // But we also should check dependent instructions for the
+ // SU in question.
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes);
}
// Add dependence on barrier chain, if needed.
+ // There is no point to check aliasing on barrier event. Even if
+ // SU and barrier _could_ be reordered, they should not. In addition,
+ // we have lost all RejectMemNodes below barrier.
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
} else {
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE =
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end());
if (I != IE)
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
- /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes, 0, true);
if (MayAlias)
AliasMemUses[V].push_back(SU);
else
// potentially aliasing stores.
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I =
AliasMemDefs.begin(), E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I)
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes);
PendingLoads.push_back(SU);
MayAlias = true;
}
-
+ if (MayAlias)
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes);
// Add dependencies on alias and barrier chains, if needed.
if (MayAlias && AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes);
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
}
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff