validation fixes

[oota-llvm.git] / docs / WritingAnLLVMPass.html

diff --git a/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html b/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
index f65b6791d31d36c2fdf25e524120282002e7b1e9..ca6c4ad4519866626bed17a9d93351025bcc2bdf 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
+++ b/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ time.</p>
 
 <div class="doc_code"><pre>
      static char ID;
-     Hello() : FunctionPass((intptr_t)&ID) {}
+     Hello() : FunctionPass((intptr_t)&amp;ID) {}
 </pre></div><p>
 
 <p> This declares pass identifier used by LLVM to identify pass. This allows LLVM to
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ refering to function bodies in no predictable order, or adding and removing
 functions.  Because nothing is known about the behavior of <tt>ModulePass</tt>
 subclasses, no optimization can be done for their execution. A module pass
 can use function level passes (e.g. dominators) using getAnalysis interface
-<tt> getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(Function)</tt>. </p> 
+<tt> getAnalysis&lt;DominatorTree&gt;(Function)</tt>. </p> 
 
 <p>To write a correct <tt>ModulePass</tt> subclass, derive from
 <tt>ModulePass</tt> and overload the <tt>runOnModule</tt> method with the
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ program, or false if they didn't. </p>
   <b>virtual bool</b> doInitialization(Loop *, LPPassManager &amp;LPM);
 </pre></div>
 
-The <tt>doInitialization</tt> method is designed to do simple initialization 
+<p>The <tt>doInitialization</tt> method is designed to do simple initialization 
 type of stuff that does not depend on the functions being processed.  The 
 <tt>doInitialization</tt> method call is not scheduled to overlap with any 
 other pass executions (thus it should be very fast). LPPassManager 
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ For example:</p>
    }
 </pre></div>
 
-In above example, runOnFunction for DominatorTree is called by pass manager
+<p>In above example, runOnFunction for DominatorTree is called by pass manager
 before returning a reference to the desired pass.</p>
 
 <p>
@@ -1797,6 +1797,8 @@ places (for global resources).  Although this is a simple extension, we simply
 haven't had time (or multiprocessor machines, thus a reason) to implement this.
 Despite that, we have kept the LLVM passes SMP ready, and you should too.</p>
 
+</div>
+
 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
 <hr>
 <address>