<li><tt>SCEVHandle</tt> no longer exists, because reference counting is no
longer done for <tt>SCEV*</tt> objects, instead <tt>const SCEV*</tt> should be
used.</li>
+
+<li>Many APIs, notably <tt>llvm::Value</tt>, now use the <tt>StringRef</tt>
+and <tt>Twine</tt> classes instead of passing <tt>const char*</tt>
+or <tt>std::string</tt>, as described in
+the <a href="ProgrammersManual.html#string_apis">Programmer's Manual</a>. Most
+clients should be unaffected by this transition, unless they are used to <tt>Value::getName()</tt> returning a string. Here are some tips on updating to 2.6:
+ <ul>
+ <li><tt>getNameStr()</tt> is still available, and matches the old
+ behavior. Replacing <tt>getName()</tt> calls with this is an safe option,
+ although more efficient alternatives are now possible.</li>
+
+ <li>If you were just relying on <tt>getName()</tt> being able to be sent to
+ a <tt>std::ostream</tt>, consider migrating
+ to <tt>llvm::raw_ostream</tt>.</li>
+
+ <li>If you were using <tt>getName().c_str()</tt> to get a <tt>const
+ char*</tt> pointer to the name, you can use <tt>getName().data()</tt>.
+ Note that this string (as before), may not be the entire name if the
+ name containts embedded null characters.</li>
+
+ <li>If you were using operator plus on the result of <tt>getName()</tt> and
+ treating the result as an <tt>std::string</tt>, you can either
+ uses <tt>Twine::str</tt> to get the result as an <tt>std::string</tt>, or
+ could move to a <tt>Twine</tt> based design.</li>
+
+ <li><tt>isName()</tt> should be replaced with comparison
+ against <tt>getName()</tt> (this is now efficient).</tt>
+ </ul>
+</li>
+
+<li>The registration interfaces for backend Targets has changed (what was
+previously TargetMachineRegistry). For backend authors, see the <a href="WritingAnLLVMBackend.html#TargetRegistration">Writing An LLVM Backend</a> guide. For clients, the notable API changes are:
+ <ul>
+ <li><tt>TargetMachineRegistry</tt> has been renamed
+ to <tt>TargetRegistry</tt>.</li>
+
+ <li>Clients should move to using the <tt>TargetRegistry::lookupTarget()</tt>
+ function to find targets.</li>
+ </ul>
+</li>
+
<li>llvm-dis now fails if output file exists, instead of dumping to stdout.
-FIXME: describe any other tool changes due to the raw_fd_ostream change</li>
+FIXME: describe any other tool changes due to the raw_fd_ostream change. FIXME:
+This is not an API change, maybe there should be a tool changes section?</li>
<li>temporarely due to Context API change passes should call doInitialization()
method of the pass they inherit from, otherwise Context is NULL.
FIXME: remove this entry when this is no longer needed.<li>
support is available for native builds with Visual C++).</li>
<li>Sun UltraSPARC workstations running Solaris 10.</li>
<li>Alpha-based machines running Debian GNU/Linux.</li>
-<li>Itanium-based (IA64) machines running Linux and HP-UX.</li>
</ul>
<p>The core LLVM infrastructure uses GNU autoconf to adapt itself
there isn't already one.</p>
<ul>
-<li>LLVM will not correctly complie on Solaris and/or OpenSolaris
+<li>LLVM will not correctly compile on Solaris and/or OpenSolaris
using the stock GCC 3.x.x series 'out the box',
See: <a href="#brokengcc">Broken versions of GCC and other tools</a>.
However, A <a href="http://pkg.auroraux.org/GCC">Modern GCC Build</a>
href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev">LLVMdev list</a>.</p>
<ul>
-<li>The MSIL, IA64, Alpha, SPU, MIPS, and PIC16 backends are experimental.</li>
+<li>The MSIL, Alpha, SPU, MIPS, and PIC16 backends are experimental.</li>
<li>The <tt>llc</tt> "<tt>-filetype=asm</tt>" (the default) is the only
supported value for this option.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</div>
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="ia64-be">Known problems with the IA64 back-end</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<ul>
-<li>The Itanium backend is highly experimental and has a number of known
- issues. We are looking for a maintainer for the Itanium backend. If you
- are interested, please contact the LLVMdev mailing list.</li>
-</ul>
-
-</div>
-
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="c-be">Known problems with the C back-end</a>