Add three more bugs

[oota-llvm.git] / docs / FAQ.html

diff --git a/docs/FAQ.html b/docs/FAQ.html
index 6b602729f3e207fe668378740091fb8ccd27fb84..2ed4441e10b26e05613939a1e2a50016d5c10b93 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/FAQ.html
+++ b/docs/FAQ.html
@@ -19,27 +19,26 @@ LLVM: Frequently Asked Questions
        under different licenses?</b>
        <dd>
        The C/C++ front-ends are based on GCC and must be distributed under
-       the GPL.  Our aim is to distribute LLVM source code are a <em>much
+       the GPL.  Our aim is to distribute LLVM source code under a <em>much
        less restrictive</em> license, in particular one that does not
        compel users who distribute tools based on modifying the source to
        redistribute the modified source code as well.
-
-       <dt><b>Does the Illinois Open Source License really qualify 
+       <p>
+       <dt><b>Does the University of Illinois Open Source License really qualify 
          as an "open source" license?</b>
-       <dd>The 
-       <a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/UoI-NCSA.php">
-        UI Open Source License</a> is certified by the
-       Open Source Initiative (OSI).
-
+       <dd>Yes, the license is 
+       <a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/UoI-NCSA.php">certified</a>
+       by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).
+       <p>
        <dt> <b>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute the modified
          source?</b>
        <dd>
-       Yes.  The modified source distribution must retain notice both the
+       Yes.  The modified source distribution must retain the
        copyright notice and follow the three bulletted conditions listed in
-       the <a href="releases/1.0/LICENSE.txt">LLVM license</a>.
-
+       the <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.0/LICENSE.TXT">LLVM license</a>.
+       <p>
        <dt> <b>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute binaries or
-         other tools based on it, without redistributing the source.
+         other tools based on it, without redistributing the source?</b>
        <dd>
        Yes, this is why we distribute LLVM under a less restrictive license
        than GPL, as explained in the first question above.