+ // Visit each use of the OrigHeader instruction.
+ for (Value::use_iterator UI = OrigHeaderVal->use_begin(),
+ UE = OrigHeaderVal->use_end(); UI != UE; ) {
+ // Grab the use before incrementing the iterator.
+ Use &U = *UI;
+
+ // Increment the iterator before removing the use from the list.
+ ++UI;
+
+ // SSAUpdater can't handle a non-PHI use in the same block as an
+ // earlier def. We can easily handle those cases manually.
+ Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
+ if (!isa<PHINode>(UserInst)) {
+ BasicBlock *UserBB = UserInst->getParent();
+
+ // The original users in the OrigHeader are already using the
+ // original definitions.
+ if (UserBB == OrigHeader)
+ continue;
+
+ // Users in the OrigPreHeader need to use the value to which the
+ // original definitions are mapped.
+ if (UserBB == OrigPreheader) {
+ U = OrigPreHeaderVal;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Anything else can be handled by SSAUpdater.
+ SSA.RewriteUse(U);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/// Determine whether the instructions in this range may be safely and cheaply
+/// speculated. This is not an important enough situation to develop complex
+/// heuristics. We handle a single arithmetic instruction along with any type
+/// conversions.
+static bool shouldSpeculateInstrs(BasicBlock::iterator Begin,
+ BasicBlock::iterator End) {
+ bool seenIncrement = false;
+ for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Begin; I != End; ++I) {
+
+ if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(I))
+ return false;
+
+ if (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(I))
+ continue;
+
+ switch (I->getOpcode()) {
+ default:
+ return false;
+ case Instruction::GetElementPtr:
+ // GEPs are cheap if all indices are constant.
+ if (!cast<GEPOperator>(I)->hasAllConstantIndices())
+ return false;
+ // fall-thru to increment case
+ case Instruction::Add:
+ case Instruction::Sub:
+ case Instruction::And:
+ case Instruction::Or:
+ case Instruction::Xor:
+ case Instruction::Shl:
+ case Instruction::LShr:
+ case Instruction::AShr:
+ if (seenIncrement)
+ return false;
+ seenIncrement = true;
+ break;
+ case Instruction::Trunc:
+ case Instruction::ZExt:
+ case Instruction::SExt:
+ // ignore type conversions
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+/// Fold the loop tail into the loop exit by speculating the loop tail
+/// instructions. Typically, this is a single post-increment. In the case of a
+/// simple 2-block loop, hoisting the increment can be much better than
+/// duplicating the entire loop header. In the case of loops with early exits,
+/// rotation will not work anyway, but simplifyLoopLatch will put the loop in
+/// canonical form so downstream passes can handle it.
+///
+/// I don't believe this invalidates SCEV.
+bool LoopRotate::simplifyLoopLatch(Loop *L) {
+ BasicBlock *Latch = L->getLoopLatch();
+ if (!Latch || Latch->hasAddressTaken())
+ return false;
+
+ BranchInst *Jmp = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(Latch->getTerminator());
+ if (!Jmp || !Jmp->isUnconditional())
+ return false;
+
+ BasicBlock *LastExit = Latch->getSinglePredecessor();
+ if (!LastExit || !L->isLoopExiting(LastExit))
+ return false;
+
+ BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(LastExit->getTerminator());
+ if (!BI)
+ return false;
+
+ if (!shouldSpeculateInstrs(Latch->begin(), Jmp))
+ return false;
+
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "Folding loop latch " << Latch->getName() << " into "
+ << LastExit->getName() << "\n");
+
+ // Hoist the instructions from Latch into LastExit.
+ LastExit->getInstList().splice(BI, Latch->getInstList(), Latch->begin(), Jmp);
+
+ unsigned FallThruPath = BI->getSuccessor(0) == Latch ? 0 : 1;
+ BasicBlock *Header = Jmp->getSuccessor(0);
+ assert(Header == L->getHeader() && "expected a backward branch");
+
+ // Remove Latch from the CFG so that LastExit becomes the new Latch.
+ BI->setSuccessor(FallThruPath, Header);
+ Latch->replaceSuccessorsPhiUsesWith(LastExit);
+ Jmp->eraseFromParent();
+
+ // Nuke the Latch block.
+ assert(Latch->empty() && "unable to evacuate Latch");
+ LI->removeBlock(Latch);
+ if (DominatorTreeWrapperPass *DTWP =
+ getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>())
+ DTWP->getDomTree().eraseNode(Latch);
+ Latch->eraseFromParent();
+ return true;
+}
+
+/// Rotate loop LP. Return true if the loop is rotated.
+///
+/// \param SimplifiedLatch is true if the latch was just folded into the final
+/// loop exit. In this case we may want to rotate even though the new latch is
+/// now an exiting branch. This rotation would have happened had the latch not
+/// been simplified. However, if SimplifiedLatch is false, then we avoid
+/// rotating loops in which the latch exits to avoid excessive or endless
+/// rotation. LoopRotate should be repeatable and converge to a canonical
+/// form. This property is satisfied because simplifying the loop latch can only
+/// happen once across multiple invocations of the LoopRotate pass.
+bool LoopRotate::rotateLoop(Loop *L, bool SimplifiedLatch) {