+LoopInfo::LoopInfo(const DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock> &DomTree) {
+ analyze(DomTree);
+}
+
+/// updateUnloop - The last backedge has been removed from a loop--now the
+/// "unloop". Find a new parent for the blocks contained within unloop and
+/// update the loop tree. We don't necessarily have valid dominators at this
+/// point, but LoopInfo is still valid except for the removal of this loop.
+///
+/// Note that Unloop may now be an empty loop. Calling Loop::getHeader without
+/// checking first is illegal.
+void LoopInfo::updateUnloop(Loop *Unloop) {
+
+ // First handle the special case of no parent loop to simplify the algorithm.
+ if (!Unloop->getParentLoop()) {
+ // Since BBLoop had no parent, Unloop blocks are no longer in a loop.
+ for (Loop::block_iterator I = Unloop->block_begin(),
+ E = Unloop->block_end();
+ I != E; ++I) {
+
+ // Don't reparent blocks in subloops.
+ if (getLoopFor(*I) != Unloop)
+ continue;
+
+ // Blocks no longer have a parent but are still referenced by Unloop until
+ // the Unloop object is deleted.
+ changeLoopFor(*I, nullptr);
+ }
+
+ // Remove the loop from the top-level LoopInfo object.
+ for (iterator I = begin();; ++I) {
+ assert(I != end() && "Couldn't find loop");
+ if (*I == Unloop) {
+ removeLoop(I);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Move all of the subloops to the top-level.
+ while (!Unloop->empty())
+ addTopLevelLoop(Unloop->removeChildLoop(std::prev(Unloop->end())));
+
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Update the parent loop for all blocks within the loop. Blocks within
+ // subloops will not change parents.
+ UnloopUpdater Updater(Unloop, this);
+ Updater.updateBlockParents();
+
+ // Remove blocks from former ancestor loops.
+ Updater.removeBlocksFromAncestors();
+
+ // Add direct subloops as children in their new parent loop.
+ Updater.updateSubloopParents();
+
+ // Remove unloop from its parent loop.
+ Loop *ParentLoop = Unloop->getParentLoop();
+ for (Loop::iterator I = ParentLoop->begin();; ++I) {
+ assert(I != ParentLoop->end() && "Couldn't find loop");
+ if (*I == Unloop) {
+ ParentLoop->removeChildLoop(I);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+char LoopAnalysis::PassID;
+
+LoopInfo LoopAnalysis::run(Function &F, AnalysisManager<Function> *AM) {
+ // FIXME: Currently we create a LoopInfo from scratch for every function.
+ // This may prove to be too wasteful due to deallocating and re-allocating
+ // memory each time for the underlying map and vector datastructures. At some
+ // point it may prove worthwhile to use a freelist and recycle LoopInfo
+ // objects. I don't want to add that kind of complexity until the scope of
+ // the problem is better understood.
+ LoopInfo LI;
+ LI.analyze(AM->getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F));
+ return LI;
+}
+
+PreservedAnalyses LoopPrinterPass::run(Function &F,
+ AnalysisManager<Function> *AM) {
+ AM->getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F).print(OS);
+ return PreservedAnalyses::all();
+}
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// LoopInfo implementation
+//
+
+char LoopInfoWrapperPass::ID = 0;
+INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopInfoWrapperPass, "loops", "Natural Loop Information",
+ true, true)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopInfoWrapperPass, "loops", "Natural Loop Information",
+ true, true)
+
+bool LoopInfoWrapperPass::runOnFunction(Function &) {
+ releaseMemory();
+ LI.analyze(getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree());
+ return false;
+}
+
+void LoopInfoWrapperPass::verifyAnalysis() const {
+ // LoopInfoWrapperPass is a FunctionPass, but verifying every loop in the
+ // function each time verifyAnalysis is called is very expensive. The
+ // -verify-loop-info option can enable this. In order to perform some
+ // checking by default, LoopPass has been taught to call verifyLoop manually
+ // during loop pass sequences.
+ if (VerifyLoopInfo)
+ LI.verify();
+}
+
+void LoopInfoWrapperPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {