From e9f59888d4e4016ccb00a02301f2a29be85575ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Trick Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:02:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix function names in coding style examples git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164311 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/CodingStandards.rst | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/CodingStandards.rst b/docs/CodingStandards.rst index cb57b890297..4f955e3012b 100644 --- a/docs/CodingStandards.rst +++ b/docs/CodingStandards.rst @@ -421,9 +421,9 @@ exit from a function, consider this "bad" code: .. code-block:: c++ - Value *DoSomething(Instruction *I) { + Value *doSomething(Instruction *I) { if (!isa(I) && - I->hasOneUse() && SomeOtherThing(I)) { + I->hasOneUse() && doOtherThing(I)) { ... some long code .... } @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ It is much preferred to format the code like this: .. code-block:: c++ - Value *DoSomething(Instruction *I) { + Value *doSomething(Instruction *I) { // Terminators never need 'something' done to them because ... if (isa(I)) return 0; @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ It is much preferred to format the code like this: return 0; // This is really just here for example. - if (!SomeOtherThing(I)) + if (!doOtherThing(I)) return 0; ... some long code .... -- 2.34.1