From 072228083f1ef2bc00ce1044c1dda4b6418bf555 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eli Bendersky Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:59:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a few more grammatic errors in docs/TableGen/index.rst git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/TableGen/index.rst | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/TableGen/index.rst b/docs/TableGen/index.rst index d62dcb1c1a4..511a97e2514 100644 --- a/docs/TableGen/index.rst +++ b/docs/TableGen/index.rst @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ which are considered 'records'. **TableGen records** have a unique name, a list of values, and a list of superclasses. The list of values is the main data that TableGen builds for each record; it is this that holds the domain specific information for the -application. The interpretation of this data is left to a specific `backends`_, +application. The interpretation of this data is left to a specific `backend`_, but the structure and format rules are taken care of and are fixed by TableGen. @@ -295,11 +295,11 @@ the basic concepts via custom-made back-ends, which can pervert the original design and make it very hard for newcomers to understand the evil TableGen file. -There are some in favour of extending the semantics even more, but makeing sure -back-ends adhere to strict rules. Others suggesting we should move to less, +There are some in favour of extending the semantics even more, but making sure +back-ends adhere to strict rules. Others are suggesting we should move to less, more powerful DSLs designed with specific purposes, or even re-using existing DSLs. -Either way, this is a discussion that is likely spanning across several years, +Either way, this is a discussion that will likely span across several years, if not decades. You can read more in the `TableGen Deficiencies `_ document. -- 2.34.1