From: Jingyue Wu Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 03:27:43 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [MachineSink] Use the real post dominator tree X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?p=oota-llvm.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=75d77cd179f19a3f1233ce036c1e0599cabe1d50 [MachineSink] Use the real post dominator tree Summary: Fixes a FIXME in MachineSinking. Instead of using the simple heuristics in isPostDominatedBy, use the real MachinePostDominatorTree and MachineLoopInfo. The old heuristics caused instructions to sink unnecessarily, and might create register pressure. This is the second try of the fix. The first one (D4814) caused a performance regression due to failing to sink instructions out of loops (PR21115). This patch fixes PR21115 by sinking an instruction from a deeper loop to a shallower one regardless of whether the target block post-dominates the source. Thanks Alexey Volkov for reporting PR21115! Test Plan: Added a NVPTX codegen test to verify that our change prevents the backend from over-sinking. It also shows the unnecessary register pressure caused by over-sinking. Added an X86 test to verify we can sink instructions out of loops regardless of the dominance relationship. This test is reduced from Alexey's test in PR21115. Updated an affected test in X86. Also ran SPEC CINT2006 and llvm-test-suite for compilation time and runtime performance. Results are attached separately in the review thread. Reviewers: Jiangning, resistor, hfinkel Reviewed By: hfinkel Subscribers: hfinkel, bruno, volkalexey, llvm-commits, meheff, eliben, jholewinski Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5633 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219773 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp index da83cacf342..b82d4e643c7 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBlockFrequencyInfo.h" #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h" #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineLoopInfo.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachinePostDominators.h" #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h" #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" @@ -54,8 +55,9 @@ namespace { class MachineSinking : public MachineFunctionPass { const TargetInstrInfo *TII; const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI; - MachineRegisterInfo *MRI; // Machine register information - MachineDominatorTree *DT; // Machine dominator tree + MachineRegisterInfo *MRI; // Machine register information + MachineDominatorTree *DT; // Machine dominator tree + MachinePostDominatorTree *PDT; // Machine post dominator tree MachineLoopInfo *LI; const MachineBlockFrequencyInfo *MBFI; AliasAnalysis *AA; @@ -81,8 +83,10 @@ namespace { MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU); AU.addRequired(); AU.addRequired(); + AU.addRequired(); AU.addRequired(); AU.addPreserved(); + AU.addPreserved(); AU.addPreserved(); if (UseBlockFreqInfo) AU.addRequired(); @@ -249,6 +253,7 @@ bool MachineSinking::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { TRI = MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo(); MRI = &MF.getRegInfo(); DT = &getAnalysis(); + PDT = &getAnalysis(); LI = &getAnalysis(); MBFI = UseBlockFreqInfo ? &getAnalysis() : nullptr; AA = &getAnalysis(); @@ -467,23 +472,6 @@ static void collectDebugValues(MachineInstr *MI, } } -/// isPostDominatedBy - Return true if A is post dominated by B. -static bool isPostDominatedBy(MachineBasicBlock *A, MachineBasicBlock *B) { - - // FIXME - Use real post dominator. - if (A->succ_size() != 2) - return false; - MachineBasicBlock::succ_iterator I = A->succ_begin(); - if (B == *I) - ++I; - MachineBasicBlock *OtherSuccBlock = *I; - if (OtherSuccBlock->succ_size() != 1 || - *(OtherSuccBlock->succ_begin()) != B) - return false; - - return true; -} - /// isProfitableToSinkTo - Return true if it is profitable to sink MI. bool MachineSinking::isProfitableToSinkTo(unsigned Reg, MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *MBB, @@ -495,8 +483,13 @@ bool MachineSinking::isProfitableToSinkTo(unsigned Reg, MachineInstr *MI, return false; // It is profitable if SuccToSinkTo does not post dominate current block. - if (!isPostDominatedBy(MBB, SuccToSinkTo)) - return true; + if (!PDT->dominates(SuccToSinkTo, MBB)) + return true; + + // It is profitable to sink an instruction from a deeper loop to a shallower + // loop, even if the latter post-dominates the former (PR21115). + if (LI->getLoopDepth(MBB) > LI->getLoopDepth(SuccToSinkTo)) + return true; // Check if only use in post dominated block is PHI instruction. bool NonPHIUse = false; diff --git a/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/machine-sink.ll b/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/machine-sink.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3614bea1653 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/NVPTX/machine-sink.ll @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +; RUN: llc < %s -march=nvptx -mcpu=sm_20 | FileCheck %s + +target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v16:16:16-v32:32:32-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-n16:32:64" + +@scalar1 = internal addrspace(3) global float 0.000000e+00, align 4 +@scalar2 = internal addrspace(3) global float 0.000000e+00, align 4 + +; We shouldn't sink mul.rn.f32 to BB %merge because BB %merge post-dominates +; BB %entry. Over-sinking created more register pressure on this example. The +; backend would sink the fmuls to BB %merge, but not the loads for being +; conservative on sinking memory accesses. As a result, the loads and +; the two fmuls would be separated to two basic blocks, causing two +; cross-BB live ranges. +define float @post_dominate(float %x, i1 %cond) { +; CHECK-LABEL: post_dominate( +entry: + %0 = load float* addrspacecast (float addrspace(3)* @scalar1 to float*), align 4 + %1 = load float* addrspacecast (float addrspace(3)* @scalar2 to float*), align 4 +; CHECK: ld.shared.f32 +; CHECK: ld.shared.f32 + %2 = fmul float %0, %0 + %3 = fmul float %1, %2 +; CHECK-NOT: bra +; CHECK: mul.rn.f32 +; CHECK: mul.rn.f32 + br i1 %cond, label %then, label %merge + +then: + %z = fadd float %x, %x + br label %then2 + +then2: + %z2 = fadd float %z, %z + br label %merge + +merge: + %y = phi float [ 0.0, %entry ], [ %z2, %then2 ] + %w = fadd float %y, %3 + ret float %w +} diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/loop-strength-reduce8.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/loop-strength-reduce8.ll index 1d042769b0b..c36047c451a 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/X86/loop-strength-reduce8.ll +++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/loop-strength-reduce8.ll @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ ; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i386-apple-darwin | FileCheck %s -; CHECK: leal 16(%eax), %edx +; FIXME: The first two instructions, movl and addl, should have been combined to +; "leal 16(%eax), %edx" by the backend (PR20776). +; CHECK: movl %eax, %edx +; CHECK: addl $16, %edx ; CHECK: align ; CHECK: addl $4, %edx ; CHECK: decl %ecx diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/sink-out-of-loop.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/sink-out-of-loop.ll index c600f925a32..6757f315b6d 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/X86/sink-out-of-loop.ll +++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/sink-out-of-loop.ll @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ ; MOV32ri outside the loop. ; rdar://11980766 define i32 @sink_succ(i32 %argc, i8** nocapture %argv) nounwind uwtable ssp { -; CHECK: sink_succ +; CHECK-LABEL: sink_succ ; CHECK: [[OUTER_LN1:LBB0_[0-9]+]]: ## %preheader ; CHECK: %exit ; CHECK-NOT: movl @@ -52,3 +52,24 @@ for.body2: for.end20: ret i32 0 } + +define i32 @sink_out_of_loop(i32 %n, i32* %output) { +; CHECK-LABEL: sink_out_of_loop: +entry: + br label %loop + +loop: + %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i2, %loop ] + %j = mul i32 %i, %i + %addr = getelementptr i32* %output, i32 %i + store i32 %i, i32* %addr + %i2 = add i32 %i, 1 + %exit_cond = icmp sge i32 %i2, %n + br i1 %exit_cond, label %exit, label %loop + +exit: +; CHECK: BB#2 +; CHECK: imull %eax, %eax +; CHECK: retq + ret i32 %j +}