ret void
}
-define void @PR16651(i8* %a) {
+define void @PR16651.1(i8* %a) {
; This test case caused a crash due to the volatile memcpy in combination with
; lowering to integer loads and stores of a width other than that of the original
; memcpy.
;
-; CHECK-LABEL: @PR16651(
+; CHECK-LABEL: @PR16651.1(
; CHECK: alloca i16
; CHECK: alloca i8
; CHECK: alloca i8
load i8* %b.gep, align 2
unreachable
}
+
+define void @PR16651.2() {
+; This test case caused a crash due to failing to promote given a select that
+; can't be speculated. It shouldn't be promoted, but we missed that fact when
+; analyzing whether we could form a vector promotion because that code didn't
+; bail on select instructions.
+;
+; CHECK-LABEL: @PR16651.2(
+; CHECK: alloca <2 x float>
+; CHECK: ret void
+
+entry:
+ %tv1 = alloca { <2 x float>, <2 x float> }, align 8
+ %0 = getelementptr { <2 x float>, <2 x float> }* %tv1, i64 0, i32 1
+ store <2 x float> undef, <2 x float>* %0, align 8
+ %1 = getelementptr inbounds { <2 x float>, <2 x float> }* %tv1, i64 0, i32 1, i64 0
+ %cond105.in.i.i = select i1 undef, float* null, float* %1
+ %cond105.i.i = load float* %cond105.in.i.i, align 8
+ ret void
+}