Function *ExecutionEngine::FindFunctionNamed(const char *FnName) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Modules.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- if (Function *F = Modules[i]->getFunction(FnName))
+ Function *F = Modules[i]->getFunction(FnName);
+ if (F && !F->isDeclaration())
return F;
}
return nullptr;
ModulePtrSet::iterator I,
ModulePtrSet::iterator E) {
for (; I != E; ++I) {
- if (Function *F = (*I)->getFunction(FnName))
+ Function *F = (*I)->getFunction(FnName);
+ if (F && !F->isDeclaration())
return F;
}
return nullptr;
ptr = TheJIT->getFunctionAddress(FB2->getName().str());
checkAccumulate(ptr);
}
+
+// Test that FindFunctionNamed finds the definition of
+// a function in the correct module. We check two functions
+// in two different modules, to make sure that for at least
+// one of them MCJIT had to ignore the extern declaration.
+TEST_F(MCJITMultipleModuleTest, FindFunctionNamed_test) {
+ SKIP_UNSUPPORTED_PLATFORM;
+
+ std::unique_ptr<Module> A, B;
+ Function *FA, *FB1, *FB2;
+ createCrossModuleRecursiveCase(A, FA, B, FB1, FB2);
+
+ createJIT(std::move(A));
+ TheJIT->addModule(std::move(B));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(FA, TheJIT->FindFunctionNamed(FA->getName().data()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(FB1, TheJIT->FindFunctionNamed(FB1->getName().data()));
+}
+
}