Breaks GDB buildbot
(http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75/builds/14517)
GCC emits DW_AT_object_pointer /everywhere/ (declaration, abstract
definition, inlined subroutine), but it looks like GCC relies on it
being somewhere other than the declaration, at least. I'll experiment
further & can hopefully still remove it from the inlined_subroutine.
This reverts commit r207705.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207719
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
}
void DwarfDebug::createAndAddScopeChildren(DwarfCompileUnit &TheCU,
- LexicalScope *Scope,
- DISubprogram Sub, DIE &ScopeDIE) {
+ LexicalScope *Scope, DIE &ScopeDIE) {
// We create children when the scope DIE is not null.
SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<DIE>, 8> Children;
if (DIE *ObjectPointer = createScopeChildrenDIE(TheCU, Scope, Children))
- // The declaration will have the object_pointer, otherwise put it on the
- // definition. This happens with ObjC blocks that have object_pointer on
- // non-member functions.
- if (!Sub.getFunctionDeclaration())
- TheCU.addDIEEntry(ScopeDIE, dwarf::DW_AT_object_pointer, *ObjectPointer);
+ TheCU.addDIEEntry(ScopeDIE, dwarf::DW_AT_object_pointer, *ObjectPointer);
// Add children
for (auto &I : Children)
if (DIE *ScopeDIE = TheCU.getDIE(Sub)) {
AbstractSPDies.insert(std::make_pair(Sub, ScopeDIE));
- createAndAddScopeChildren(TheCU, Scope, Sub, *ScopeDIE);
+ createAndAddScopeChildren(TheCU, Scope, *ScopeDIE);
}
}
DIE &ScopeDIE = updateSubprogramScopeDIE(TheCU, Sub);
- createAndAddScopeChildren(TheCU, Scope, Sub, ScopeDIE);
+ createAndAddScopeChildren(TheCU, Scope, ScopeDIE);
return ScopeDIE;
}
std::unique_ptr<DIE> constructScopeDIE(DwarfCompileUnit &TheCU,
LexicalScope *Scope);
void createAndAddScopeChildren(DwarfCompileUnit &TheCU, LexicalScope *Scope,
- DISubprogram Sub, DIE &ScopeDIE);
+ DIE &ScopeDIE);
/// \brief Construct a DIE for this abstract scope.
void constructAbstractSubprogramScopeDIE(DwarfCompileUnit &TheCU,
LexicalScope *Scope);
}
/// constructSubprogramArguments - Construct function argument DIEs.
-DIE *DwarfUnit::constructSubprogramArguments(DIE &Buffer, DIArray Args) {
- DIE *ObjectPointer = nullptr;
+void DwarfUnit::constructSubprogramArguments(DIE &Buffer, DIArray Args) {
for (unsigned i = 1, N = Args.getNumElements(); i < N; ++i) {
DIDescriptor Ty = Args.getElement(i);
if (Ty.isUnspecifiedParameter()) {
addType(Arg, DIType(Ty));
if (DIType(Ty).isArtificial())
addFlag(Arg, dwarf::DW_AT_artificial);
- if (DIType(Ty).isObjectPointer())
- ObjectPointer = &Arg;
}
}
- return ObjectPointer;
}
/// constructTypeDIE - Construct type DIE from DICompositeType.
// Add arguments. Do not add arguments for subprogram definition. They will
// be handled while processing variables.
- if (DIE *ObjectPointer = constructSubprogramArguments(SPDie, Args))
- addDIEEntry(SPDie, dwarf::DW_AT_object_pointer, *ObjectPointer);
+ constructSubprogramArguments(SPDie, Args);
}
if (SP.isArtificial())
AbstractOrInlined AbsIn = AOI_None);
/// constructSubprogramArguments - Construct function argument DIEs.
- DIE *constructSubprogramArguments(DIE &Buffer, DIArray Args);
+ void constructSubprogramArguments(DIE &Buffer, DIArray Args);
/// Create a DIE with the given Tag, add the DIE to its parent, and
/// call insertDIE if MD is not null.
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin %s -o %t -filetype=obj
; RUN: llvm-dwarfdump -debug-dump=info %t | FileCheck %s
-; Emit the DW_TAG_object_pointer on the declaration only, not the definition.
-; This seems the most correct thing - the DW_TAG_object_pointer is inherited
-; from the declaration to any (abstract or concrete) definitions and DWARF
-; consumers can use this information for callers that can only see the
-; declaration.
-; That said, it isn't very space efficient - making member function
-; declarations 11 bytes instead of 7 and I'm not sure which tools actually
-; use this information here (ObjC Blocks are a different story & most likely
-; require object_pointer) - perhaps we should omit it entirely for space.
-; No overall space impact study has been performed.
-
-; CHECK: [[DEFINITION:0x[0-9a-f]*]]: DW_TAG_subprogram
-; CHECK-NOT: DW_TAG
-; CHECK-NOT: DW_TAG_object_pointer
+; CHECK: DW_TAG_formal_parameter [
+; CHECK-NOT: ""
; CHECK: DW_TAG
-
; CHECK: DW_TAG_class_type
-; CHECK-NOT: NULL
-; CHECK: DW_TAG_subprogram
-; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name {{.*}} "A"
; CHECK: DW_AT_object_pointer [DW_FORM_ref4] (cu + 0x{{[0-9a-f]*}} => {[[PARAM:0x[0-9a-f]*]]})
; CHECK: [[PARAM]]: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
+; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x{{[0-9a-f]*}}] = "this")
%class.A = type { i32 }
; CHECK-NOT: DW_AT_artificial
; CHECK: DW_TAG
-; But make sure we emit DW_AT_object_pointer on the declaration.
-; CHECK: DW_TAG_structure_type
-; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name {{.*}} "foo"
-; CHECK-NOT: NULL
-; CHECK: [[DECLARATION:0x[0-9a-e]*]]: DW_TAG_subprogram
-; CHECK-NOT: DW_TAG
-; CHECK: DW_AT_object_pointer
-
-; But don't put it on the abstract definition, either.
+; But make sure we emit DW_AT_object_pointer on the abstract definition.
; CHECK: [[ABSTRACT_ORIGIN]]: DW_TAG_subprogram
-; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_specification {{.*}}{[[DECLARATION]]}
; CHECK-NOT: NULL
-; CHECK-NOT: DW_AT_object_pointer
-; CHECK: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
+; CHECK-NOT: TAG
+; CHECK: DW_AT_object_pointer
%struct.foo = type { i8 }