[PM] Fix a contradiction in the comments noticed by Anders.

Have I mentioned that functions returning true on error and false on
success are confusing? They're more confusing when their name is
"verify". Anyways...

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199622 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/include/llvm/IR/Verifier.h b/include/llvm/IR/Verifier.h
index f5d8945ea063a5008405e3fdb167b0eb9673480f..0f146e6936d85fefd90c0ee42c12843560a4edcb 100644 (file)
--- a/include/llvm/IR/Verifier.h
+++ b/include/llvm/IR/Verifier.h
@@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ class raw_ostream;
 /// pass.
 ///
 /// If there are no errors, the function returns false. If an error is found,
-/// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and false is
+/// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and true is
 /// returned.
 bool verifyFunction(const Function &F, raw_ostream *OS = 0);
 
 /// \brief Check a module for errors.
 ///
 /// If there are no errors, the function returns false. If an error is found,
-/// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and false is
+/// a message describing the error is written to OS (if non-null) and true is
 /// returned.
 bool verifyModule(const Module &M, raw_ostream *OS = 0);