This is something like nullopt in std::experimental::optional. Optional
could already be constructed from None, so this seems like an obvious
extension from there.
I have a use in a future patch for Clang, though it may not go that
way/end up used - so this seemed worth committing now regardless.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@245518
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
template<typename T, typename U>
void operator==(const Optional<T> &X, const Optional<U> &Y);
template<typename T, typename U>
void operator==(const Optional<T> &X, const Optional<U> &Y);
+template<typename T>
+bool operator==(const Optional<T> &X, NoneType) {
+ return !X.hasValue();
+}
+
+template<typename T>
+bool operator==(NoneType, const Optional<T> &X) {
+ return X == None;
+}
+
+template<typename T>
+bool operator!=(const Optional<T> &X, NoneType) {
+ return !(X == None);
+}
+
+template<typename T>
+bool operator!=(NoneType, const Optional<T> &X) {
+ return X != None;
+}
/// \brief Poison comparison between two \c Optional objects. Clients needs to
/// explicitly compare the underlying values and account for empty \c Optional
/// objects.
/// \brief Poison comparison between two \c Optional objects. Clients needs to
/// explicitly compare the underlying values and account for empty \c Optional
/// objects.
#endif // LLVM_HAS_RVALUE_REFERENCE_THIS
#endif // LLVM_HAS_RVALUE_REFERENCE_THIS
+TEST_F(OptionalTest, NoneComparison) {
+ Optional<int> o;
+ EXPECT_EQ(o, None);
+ EXPECT_EQ(None, o);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(o != None);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(None != o);
+ o = 3;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(o == None);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(None == o);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(o != None);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(None != o);
+}
+
} // end anonymous namespace
} // end anonymous namespace