Reapply r79708 with the appropriate fix for the case that still requires locking.
authorOwen Anderson <resistor@mac.com>
Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:32:36 +0000 (06:32 +0000)
committerOwen Anderson <resistor@mac.com>
Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:32:36 +0000 (06:32 +0000)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@79731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp

index 72f21125263f550ab1e7795fd4eea394e1dad1b7..6ce30f6864b4127dc509a424dcde38fe3cf79744 100644 (file)
@@ -5022,12 +5022,16 @@ static ManagedStatic<sys::SmartMutex<true> > VTMutex;
 /// getValueTypeList - Return a pointer to the specified value type.
 ///
 const EVT *SDNode::getValueTypeList(EVT VT) {
-  sys::SmartScopedLock<true> Lock(*VTMutex);
   if (VT.isExtended()) {
+    sys::SmartScopedLock<true> Lock(*VTMutex);
     return &(*EVTs->insert(VT).first);
   } else {
+    // All writes to this location will have the same value, so it's ok
+    // to race on it.  We only need to ensure that at least one write has
+    // succeeded before we return the pointer into the array.
     VTs[VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy] = VT;
-    return &VTs[VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy];
+    sys::MemoryFence();
+    return VTs + VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy;
   }
 }