; use-def chains would be messed up. Primarily a compile-test (we used to
; internal fault).
call void @bar()
-; CHECL: bl bar
+; CHECK: bl bar
; CHECK: vext.32
; CHECK: vext.32
ret float %val
; CHECK: t1:
; CHECK: mla r0, r2, r0, r1
; CHECK: add.w r0, r0, r0, lsl #3
-; CHECL: add.w r0, r3, r0, lsl #2
+; CHECK: add.w r0, r3, r0, lsl #2
%mul = mul i32 %n, %i
%add = add i32 %mul, %j
%0 = ptrtoint %struct.CMPoint* %thePoints to i32
; CHECK: @test9
%j = mul i32 %i, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
ret i32 %j
-; CHECJ: sub i32 0, %i
+; CHECK: sub i32 0, %i
}
define i32 @test10(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
}
define <2 x i8> @PR14349.1(i32 %x) {
-; CEHCK: @PR14349.1
+; CHECK: @PR14349.1
; The first testcase for broken SROA rewriting of split integer loads and
; stores due to smaller vector loads and stores. This particular test ensures
; that we can rewrite a split store of an integer to a store of a vector.
}
define i32 @PR14349.2(<2 x i8> %x) {
-; CEHCK: @PR14349.2
+; CHECK: @PR14349.2
; The first testcase for broken SROA rewriting of split integer loads and
; stores due to smaller vector loads and stores. This particular test ensures
; that we can rewrite a split load of an integer to a load of a vector.