; inline and be cheap. We should eventually do that and lower the threshold here
; to 1.
;
-; CHECK: @caller2
+; CHECK-LABEL: @caller2(
; CHECK-NOT: call void @callee2
; CHECK: ret
; it doesn't count toward the inline cost when constant-prop proves those paths
; dead.
;
-; CHECK: @caller3
+; CHECK-LABEL: @caller3(
; CHECK-NOT: call
; CHECK: ret i32 6
; as they are used heavily in standard library code and generic C++ code where
; the arguments are oftent constant but complete generality is required.
;
-; CHECK: @caller4
+; CHECK-LABEL: @caller4(
; CHECK-NOT: call
; CHECK: ret i8 -1
; Check that we can round trip constants through various kinds of casts etc w/o
; losing track of the constant prop in the inline cost analysis.
;
-; CHECK: @caller5
+; CHECK-LABEL: @caller5(
; CHECK-NOT: call
; CHECK: ret i64 -1