From: Brian Norris <banorris@uci.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 02:22:52 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: test: insanesync: convert to C++
X-Git-Tag: oopsla2013-final~2
X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?p=model-checker.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=c77e68595cf28639352e548241f648988641fc8d

test: insanesync: convert to C++

The syntax is clearer this way, and I can make it more consistent with
the other satisfaction cycle examples I wrote.
---

diff --git a/test/insanesync.c b/test/insanesync.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 2f446dd..0000000
--- a/test/insanesync.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,69 +0,0 @@
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <stdio.h>
-#include <threads.h>
-#include <stdatomic.h>
-
-#include "librace.h"
-#include "model-assert.h"
-
-atomic_int x;
-atomic_int y;
-atomic_intptr_t z;
-atomic_intptr_t z2;
-
-/** 
-		This example illustrates a self-satisfying cycle involving
-		synchronization.  A failed synchronization creates the store that
-		causes the synchronization to fail. 
-		
-		The C++11 memory model nominally allows t1=0, t2=1, t3=5.
-
-		This example is insane, we don't support that behavior.
-*/
-
-
-static void a(void *obj)
-{
-	atomic_store_explicit(&z, (intptr_t) &y, memory_order_relaxed);
-	int t1=atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&y, 1, memory_order_release);
-	atomic_store_explicit(&z, (intptr_t) &x, memory_order_relaxed);
-	int t2=atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&y, 1, memory_order_release);
-	printf("t1=%d, t2=%d\n", t1, t2);
-}
-
-
-static void b(void *obj)
-{
-	int t3=atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&y, 1, memory_order_acquire);
-	void *ptr = (void *)atomic_load_explicit(&z, memory_order_relaxed);
-	atomic_store_explicit(&z2, (intptr_t)ptr, memory_order_relaxed);
-	printf("t3=%d\n", t3);
-}
-
-static void c(void *obj)
-{
-	void * ptr2=(void *) atomic_load_explicit(&z2, memory_order_relaxed);
-	atomic_store_explicit((atomic_int *)ptr2, 5, memory_order_relaxed);
-}
-
-int user_main(int argc, char **argv)
-{
-	thrd_t t1, t2, t3;
-
-	
-	atomic_init(&x, 0);
-	atomic_init(&y, 0);
-	atomic_init(&z, (intptr_t) &x);
-	atomic_init(&z2, (intptr_t) &x);
-
-	thrd_create(&t1, (thrd_start_t)&a, NULL);
-	thrd_create(&t2, (thrd_start_t)&b, NULL);
-	thrd_create(&t3, (thrd_start_t)&c, NULL);
-	
-	thrd_join(t1);
-	thrd_join(t2);
-	thrd_join(t3);
-	
-
-	return 0;
-}
diff --git a/test/insanesync.cc b/test/insanesync.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..57c610e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/insanesync.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <threads.h>
+#include <atomic>
+
+#include "librace.h"
+#include "model-assert.h"
+
+using namespace std;
+
+atomic_int x;
+atomic_int y;
+atomic_intptr_t z;
+atomic_intptr_t z2;
+
+int r1, r2, r3; /* "local" variables */
+
+/**
+		This example illustrates a self-satisfying cycle involving
+		synchronization.  A failed synchronization creates the store that
+		causes the synchronization to fail.
+
+		The C++11 memory model nominally allows r1=0, r2=1, r3=5.
+
+		This example is insane, we don't support that behavior.
+*/
+
+
+static void a(void *obj)
+{
+	z.store((intptr_t)&y, memory_order_relaxed);
+	r1 = y.fetch_add(1, memory_order_release);
+	z.store((intptr_t)&x, memory_order_relaxed);
+	r2 = y.fetch_add(1, memory_order_release);
+}
+
+
+static void b(void *obj)
+{
+	r3 = y.fetch_add(1, memory_order_acquire);
+	void *ptr = (void *)z.load(memory_order_relaxed);
+	z2.store((intptr_t)ptr, memory_order_relaxed);
+}
+
+static void c(void *obj)
+{
+	atomic_int *ptr2 = (atomic_int *)z2.load(memory_order_relaxed);
+	(*ptr2).store(5, memory_order_relaxed);
+}
+
+int user_main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	thrd_t t1, t2, t3;
+
+	atomic_init(&x, 0);
+	atomic_init(&y, 0);
+	atomic_init(&z, (intptr_t) &x);
+	atomic_init(&z2, (intptr_t) &x);
+
+	thrd_create(&t1, (thrd_start_t)&a, NULL);
+	thrd_create(&t2, (thrd_start_t)&b, NULL);
+	thrd_create(&t3, (thrd_start_t)&c, NULL);
+
+	thrd_join(t1);
+	thrd_join(t2);
+	thrd_join(t3);
+
+	printf("r1=%d, r2=%d, r3=%d\n", r1, r2, r3);
+
+	return 0;
+}