From 2627422b8bfba845fc2583032b96d581b72d0e4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Norris <banorris@uci.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:58:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] model: correct mo_graph comment

My understanding of the mo_graph was incorrect, due to some confusion over the
CycleGraph interfaces. Correct this.
---
 model.h | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/model.h b/model.h
index fcdc69fd..98b9d5ff 100644
--- a/model.h
+++ b/model.h
@@ -132,10 +132,9 @@ private:
 	 * disjoint (unconnected) subgraphs, each graph corresponding to a
 	 * separate ordering on a distinct object.
 	 *
-	 * Note that the edges in this graph actually represent the "ordered
-	 * after" relation, such that <tt>a --> b</tt> means <tt>a</tt> was
-	 * ordered after <tt>b</tt>, or in the traditional sense of
-	 * modification order, <tt>b --mo--> a</tt>.
+	 * The edges in this graph represent the "ordered before" relation,
+	 * such that <tt>a --> b</tt> means <tt>a</tt> was ordered before
+	 * <tt>b</tt>.
 	 */
 	CycleGraph *mo_graph;
 
-- 
2.34.1