From ac2cc0170f7d13e7c2e87f7728c99a6d07876f5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnold Schwaighofer Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 23:26:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] LoopVectorizer: Pass OperandValueKind information to the cost model Pass down the fact that an operand is going to be a vector of constants. This should bring the performance of MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p on x86 back. It had degraded to scalar performance due to my pervious shift cost change that made all shifts expensive on x86. radar://13576547 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178809 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | 15 ++++++++-- .../X86/constant-vector-operand.ll | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/constant-vector-operand.ll diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp index 930d9c412f2..acf2b819b81 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp @@ -3331,8 +3331,19 @@ LoopVectorizationCostModel::getInstructionCost(Instruction *I, unsigned VF) { case Instruction::AShr: case Instruction::And: case Instruction::Or: - case Instruction::Xor: - return TTI.getArithmeticInstrCost(I->getOpcode(), VectorTy); + case Instruction::Xor: { + // Certain instructions can be cheaper to vectorize if they have a constant + // second vector operand. One example of this are shifts on x86. + TargetTransformInfo::OperandValueKind Op1VK = + TargetTransformInfo::OK_AnyValue; + TargetTransformInfo::OperandValueKind Op2VK = + TargetTransformInfo::OK_AnyValue; + + if (isa(I->getOperand(1))) + Op2VK = TargetTransformInfo::OK_UniformConstantValue; + + return TTI.getArithmeticInstrCost(I->getOpcode(), VectorTy, Op1VK, Op2VK); + } case Instruction::Select: { SelectInst *SI = cast(I); const SCEV *CondSCEV = SE->getSCEV(SI->getCondition()); diff --git a/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/constant-vector-operand.ll b/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/constant-vector-operand.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6c924409af3 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/constant-vector-operand.ll @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +; RUN: opt -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -mcpu=core2 -loop-vectorize -dce -instcombine -S < %s | FileCheck %s + +@B = common global [1024 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 16 +@A = common global [1024 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 16 + +; We use to not vectorize this loop because the shift was deemed to expensive. +; Now that we differentiate shift cost base on the operand value kind, we will +; vectorize this loop. +; CHECK: ashr <4 x i32> +define void @f() { +entry: + br label %for.body + +for.body: + %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] + %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1024 x i32]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv + %0 = load i32* %arrayidx, align 4 + %shl = ashr i32 %0, 3 + %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds [1024 x i32]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv + store i32 %shl, i32* %arrayidx2, align 4 + %indvars.iv.next = add i64 %indvars.iv, 1 + %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32 + %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, 1024 + br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body + +for.end: + ret void +} -- 2.34.1