From 71d8f3b9e4b56cae6faa291e7f52efa512f65ed8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Lattner Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:30:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix typo noticed by Duncan git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/CodingStandards.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/CodingStandards.html b/docs/CodingStandards.html index 6e1c240a000..8d460009457 100644 --- a/docs/CodingStandards.html +++ b/docs/CodingStandards.html @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ More importantly, it forces you to pick a name for the function, and forces you to write a comment for it. In this silly example, this doesn't add much value. However, if the condition is complex, this can make it a lot easier for the reader to understand the code that queries for this predicate. Instead -of being faced with the in-line details of we check to see if the BarList +of being faced with the in-line details of how we check to see if the BarList contains a foo, we can trust the function name and continue reading with better locality.

-- 2.34.1