From 26a99d17deac96778e2356d8a035525871ab14b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund@2pi.dk>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:30:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PIC16 comments referencing copyRegToReg.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 lib/Target/PIC16/PIC16InstrInfo.td | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Target/PIC16/PIC16InstrInfo.td b/lib/Target/PIC16/PIC16InstrInfo.td
index a37453903fe..86d36cb76ee 100644
--- a/lib/Target/PIC16/PIC16InstrInfo.td
+++ b/lib/Target/PIC16/PIC16InstrInfo.td
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ class BinOpFW<bits<6> OpCode, string OpcStr, SDNode OpNode>:
 // F = F Op W : Load the value from F, do op with W and store in F.
 // This insn class is not marked as TwoAddress because the reg is
 // being used as a source operand only. (Remember a TwoAddress insn
-// needs a copyRegToReg.)
+// needs a copy.)
 let mayStore = 1 in
 class BinOpWF<bits<6> OpCode, string OpcStr, SDNode OpNode>:
   ByteFormat<OpCode, (outs),
@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ def set_pclath:
              [(set PCLATHR:$dst , (MTPCLATH GPR:$val))]>;
 
 //----------------------------
-// copyRegToReg 
-// copyRegToReg insns. These are dummy. They should always be deleted
+// copyPhysReg 
+// copyPhysReg insns. These are dummy. They should always be deleted
 // by the optimizer and never be present in the final generated code.
 // if they are, then we have to write correct macros for these insns.
 //----------------------------
-- 
2.34.1