From 01d9c7dda77f3a0141324946afedb19036bc1292 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Griess <pgriess@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:35:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Use RW_SPINLOCK_USE_X86_INTRINSIC_ in RWSpinLockTest

Summary:
- This macro is computed based on whether or not we support x86
intrinsics in RWSpinLock.h; re-use it rather than re-computing
this (and getting it wrong).

Test Plan:
- fbconfig -r folly && fbmake runtests
- ./configure && make check on Ubuntu/FC/Mac

Reviewed By: oyamauchi@fb.com

FB internal diff: D998586
---
 folly/test/RWSpinLockTest.cpp | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/folly/test/RWSpinLockTest.cpp b/folly/test/RWSpinLockTest.cpp
index 9169e887..85181730 100644
--- a/folly/test/RWSpinLockTest.cpp
+++ b/folly/test/RWSpinLockTest.cpp
@@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ template<typename RWSpinLockT> struct RWSpinLockTest: public testing::Test {
 };
 
 typedef testing::Types<RWSpinLock
-#if defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(__i386) || defined(__x86_64__) || \
-    defined(ARCH_K8))
+#ifdef RW_SPINLOCK_USE_X86_INTRINSIC_
         , RWTicketSpinLockT<32, true>,
         RWTicketSpinLockT<32, false>,
         RWTicketSpinLockT<64, true>,
-- 
2.34.1