From 015255c0401cdd5f699fc2c0edd6f0239253a6f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sanjay Patel Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:51:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix formatting; NFC git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@254739 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp | 43 +++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp index ce79fcf9ad8..b1a01614b4a 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86SelectionDAGInfo.cpp @@ -44,13 +44,10 @@ bool X86SelectionDAGInfo::isBaseRegConflictPossible( return false; } -SDValue -X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl, - SDValue Chain, - SDValue Dst, SDValue Src, - SDValue Size, unsigned Align, - bool isVolatile, - MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo) const { +SDValue X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset( + SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl, SDValue Chain, SDValue Dst, SDValue Src, + SDValue Size, unsigned Align, bool isVolatile, + MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo) const { ConstantSDNode *ConstantSize = dyn_cast(Size); const X86Subtarget &Subtarget = DAG.getMachineFunction().getSubtarget(); @@ -74,10 +71,10 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl, // Check to see if there is a specialized entry-point for memory zeroing. ConstantSDNode *V = dyn_cast(Src); - if (const char *bzeroEntry = V && + if (const char *bzeroEntry = V && V->isNullValue() ? Subtarget.getBZeroEntry() : nullptr) { - EVT IntPtr = - DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().getPointerTy(DAG.getDataLayout()); + const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo(); + EVT IntPtr = TLI.getPointerTy(DAG.getDataLayout()); Type *IntPtrTy = DAG.getDataLayout().getIntPtrType(*DAG.getContext()); TargetLowering::ArgListTy Args; TargetLowering::ArgListEntry Entry; @@ -94,7 +91,7 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl, 0) .setDiscardResult(); - std::pair CallResult = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().LowerCallTo(CLI); + std::pair CallResult = TLI.LowerCallTo(CLI); return CallResult.second; } @@ -144,8 +141,8 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl, BytesLeft = SizeVal % UBytes; } - Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, ValReg, DAG.getConstant(Val, dl, AVT), - InFlag); + Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, ValReg, DAG.getConstant(Val, dl, AVT), + InFlag); InFlag = Chain.getValue(1); } else { AVT = MVT::i8; @@ -172,9 +169,8 @@ X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemset(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc dl, SDValue Left = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, dl, CVT, Count, DAG.getConstant((AVT == MVT::i64) ? 7 : 3, dl, CVT)); - Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, (CVT == MVT::i64) ? X86::RCX : - X86::ECX, - Left, InFlag); + Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, (CVT == MVT::i64) ? X86::RCX : X86::ECX, + Left, InFlag); InFlag = Chain.getValue(1); Tys = DAG.getVTList(MVT::Other, MVT::Glue); SDValue Ops[] = { Chain, DAG.getValueType(MVT::i8), InFlag }; @@ -249,17 +245,14 @@ SDValue X86SelectionDAGInfo::EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy( unsigned BytesLeft = SizeVal % UBytes; SDValue InFlag; - Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RCX : - X86::ECX, - Count, InFlag); + Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RCX : X86::ECX, + Count, InFlag); InFlag = Chain.getValue(1); - Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RDI : - X86::EDI, - Dst, InFlag); + Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RDI : X86::EDI, + Dst, InFlag); InFlag = Chain.getValue(1); - Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RSI : - X86::ESI, - Src, InFlag); + Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, Subtarget.is64Bit() ? X86::RSI : X86::ESI, + Src, InFlag); InFlag = Chain.getValue(1); SDVTList Tys = DAG.getVTList(MVT::Other, MVT::Glue); -- 2.34.1