From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:08:37 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: mention that unwind isn't to be trusted, patch by Dustin Laurence
X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=df7a680964dbc0d7957a4233e9bb2e5415e7db94;p=oota-llvm.git

mention that unwind isn't to be trusted, patch by Dustin Laurence


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93518 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/docs/LangRef.html b/docs/LangRef.html
index 0a46e27bb83..d8229033f92 100644
--- a/docs/LangRef.html
+++ b/docs/LangRef.html
@@ -2840,6 +2840,9 @@ IfUnequal:
    block to the "normal" label. If the callee unwinds then no return value is
    available.</p>
 
+<p>Note that the code generator does not yet completely support unwind, and
+that the invoke/unwind semantics are likely to change in future versions.</p>
+
 <h5>Example:</h5>
 <pre>
   %retval = invoke i32 @Test(i32 15) to label %Continue
@@ -2876,6 +2879,9 @@ Instruction</a> </div>
    specified by the <tt>invoke</tt> instruction.  If there is no <tt>invoke</tt>
    instruction in the dynamic call chain, undefined behavior results.</p>
 
+<p>Note that the code generator does not yet completely support unwind, and
+that the invoke/unwind semantics are likely to change in future versions.</p>
+
 </div>
 
 <!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->