From: Juergen Ributzka Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:05:27 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [SwitchLowering] Fix the "fixPhis" function. X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d0995fb98219a056006645f21833c450c78cc96b;p=oota-llvm.git [SwitchLowering] Fix the "fixPhis" function. Switch statements may have more than one incoming edge into the same BB if they all have the same value. When the switch statement is converted these incoming edges are now coming from multiple BBs. Updating all incoming values to be from a single BB is incorrect and would generate invalid LLVM IR. The fix is to only update the first occurrence of an incoming value. Switch lowering will perform subsequent calls to this helper function for each incoming edge with a new basic block - updating all edges in the process. This fixes rdar://problem/18916275. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221627 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp index d6e5bb62680..a0105c23d75 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp @@ -131,17 +131,24 @@ static raw_ostream& operator<<(raw_ostream &O, return O << "]"; } -static void fixPhis(BasicBlock *Succ, - BasicBlock *OrigBlock, - BasicBlock *NewNode) { - for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Succ->begin(), - E = Succ->getFirstNonPHI(); +/// \brief Update the first occurrence of the "switch statement" BB in the PHI +/// node with the "new" BB. The other occurrences will be updated by subsequent +/// calls to this function. +/// +/// Switch statements may have more than one incoming edge into the same BB if +/// they all have the same value. When the switch statement is converted these +/// incoming edges are now coming from multiple BBs. +static void fixPhis(BasicBlock *SuccBB, BasicBlock *OrigBB, BasicBlock *NewBB) { + for (BasicBlock::iterator I = SuccBB->begin(), E = SuccBB->getFirstNonPHI(); I != E; ++I) { PHINode *PN = cast(I); - for (unsigned I = 0, E = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); I != E; ++I) { - if (PN->getIncomingBlock(I) == OrigBlock) - PN->setIncomingBlock(I, NewNode); + // Only update the first occurence. + for (unsigned Idx = 0, E = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); Idx != E; ++Idx) { + if (PN->getIncomingBlock(Idx) == OrigBB) { + PN->setIncomingBlock(Idx, NewBB); + break; + } } } } diff --git a/test/Transforms/Util/lowerswitch.ll b/test/Transforms/Util/lowerswitch.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..06bd4ccd11c --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Transforms/Util/lowerswitch.ll @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +; RUN: opt -lowerswitch -S < %s | FileCheck %s + +; Test that we don't crash and have a different basic block for each incoming edge. +define void @test_lower_switch() { +; CHECK-LABEL: @test_lower_switch +; CHECK: %merge = phi i64 [ 1, %BB3 ], [ 0, %NewDefault ], [ 0, %NodeBlock5 ], [ 0, %LeafBlock1 ] +BB1: + switch i32 undef, label %BB2 [ + i32 3, label %BB2 + i32 5, label %BB2 + i32 0, label %BB3 + i32 2, label %BB3 + i32 4, label %BB3 + ] + +BB2: + %merge = phi i64 [ 1, %BB3 ], [ 0, %BB1 ], [ 0, %BB1 ], [ 0, %BB1 ] + ret void + +BB3: + br label %BB2 +}