From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:01:23 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: New testcase
X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=afadc96d28bf7df1a32b3ab6cc09b4253934711b;p=oota-llvm.git

New testcase


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@3399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/test/CBackend/2002-08-20-UnnamedArgument.ll b/test/CBackend/2002-08-20-UnnamedArgument.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..842c2d7cba8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CBackend/2002-08-20-UnnamedArgument.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+; The C Writer bombs on this testcase because it tries the print the prototype
+; for the test function, which tries to print the argument name.  The function
+; has not been incorporated into the slot calculator, so after it does the name
+; lookup, it tries a slot calculator lookup, which fails.
+
+int %test(int) {
+        ret int 0
+}
+
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/CBackend/2002-08-20-UnnamedArgument.ll b/test/CodeGen/CBackend/2002-08-20-UnnamedArgument.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..842c2d7cba8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/CBackend/2002-08-20-UnnamedArgument.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+; The C Writer bombs on this testcase because it tries the print the prototype
+; for the test function, which tries to print the argument name.  The function
+; has not been incorporated into the slot calculator, so after it does the name
+; lookup, it tries a slot calculator lookup, which fails.
+
+int %test(int) {
+        ret int 0
+}
+